Use these operators in an expression is considered dangerous.
So avoid to use it in an expression which is not in stand-alone
expressions and the 3rd expression of a for loop.
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Li, Fei1 <fei1.li@intel.com>
IEC 61508,ISO 26262 standards highly recommend single-exit rule.
Reduce the count of the "return entries".
Fix the violations which is comply with the cases list below:
1.Function has 2 return entries.
2.The first return entry is used to return the error code of
checking variable whether is valid.
Fix the violations in "if else" format.
V1->V2:
make the return value match to int32_t
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Huihuang Shi <huihuang.shi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
For data structure types "struct vm", its name is identical
with variable name in the same scope. This is a MISRA C violation.
Naming convention rule:If the data structure type is used by multi
modules, its corresponding logic resource is exposed to external
components (such as SOS, UOS), and its name meaning is simplistic
(such as vcpu, vm), its name needs prefix "acrn_".
The following udpates are made:
struct vm *vm-->struct acrn_vm *vm
Tracked-On: #861
Signed-off-by: Xiangyang Wu <xiangyang.wu@linux.intel.com>
After enabling vPCI in hypervisor for vm0, UOS may not able be launched
successfully. Consider this scenario (take MSI-X for example):
- DM makes hypercall to hypervisor to do MSI-X remapping on behalf of
UOS guests.
- After the hypercall, VHM module in SOS kernel updates the physical
MSI-X table with the physical Message Data/Addr.
- These MMIO write requests are intercepted by hypervisor, which will
call ptdev_msix_remap() to do MSI-S remapping.
It may fail due to 2 possible reasons:
1) wrong target VM because:
hypervisor thinks it's a VM0 MSI-X device but they have been registered
as UOS guests through HC_SET_PTDEV_INTR_INFO hypercall.
2) wrong ptdev_msi_info->vmsi_data because:
The virtual MSI-X table is supposed to hold virtual Message data/addr
but the SOS VHM writes the physical ones to it.
This patch resolves these problems by ignoring the HC_VM_PCI_MSIX_REMAP
hypercall, so virtual and physical Message Data are the same from SOS'
perspective and it won't mess up the virtual PCI device in HV.
Also in HC_SET_PTDEV_INTR_INFO handler, vpci updates the target VM
when the PCI devices are assigned to different VMs.
The UOS' MSI/MSI-X remapping is triggered by hypervisor when SOS (either
DM or VHM) updates the Message Data/Addr.
Tracked-On: #1568
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu@intel.com>
Compared with partition_mode.c, the major difference between them is
the list of PCI devices is statically defined or dynamically
enumerated and allocated.
Tracked-On: #1568
Signed-off-by: dongshen <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu@intel.com>
