In spite of Table Size in MSI-X Message Control Register [Bits 10:0] masks as
RO (Register bits are read-only and cannot be altered by software), In Spec
PCIe 6.0, Chap 6.1.4.2 MSI-X Configuration "Depending upon system software
policy, system software, device driver software, or each at different times or
environments may configure a Function’s MSI-X Capability and table structures
with suitable vectors."
This patch just pass through MSI-X Control Register field to guest.
Tracked-On: #7275
Signed-off-by: Fei Li <fei1.li@intel.com>
Many of the license and Intel copyright headers include the "All rights
reserved" string. It is not relevant in the context of the BSD-3-Clause
license that the code is released under. This patch removes those strings
throughout the code (hypervisor, devicemodel and misc).
Tracked-On: #7254
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Van Cutsem <geoffroy.vancutsem@intel.com>
The coding guideline rule C-ST-04 requires that
a 'if' statement followed by one or more 'else if'
statement shall be terminated by an 'else' statement
which contains either appropriate action or a comment.
Tracked-On: #6776
Signed-off-by: Mingqiang Chi <mingqiang.chi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu@intel.com>
The coding guideline rules C-TY-27 and C-TY-28, combined, requires that
assignment and arithmetic operations shall be applied only on operands of the
same kind. This patch either adds explicit type casts or adjust types of
variables to align the types of operands.
The only semantic change introduced by this patch is the promotion of the
second argument of set_vmcs_bit() and clear_vmcs_bit() to
uint64_t (formerly uint32_t). This avoids clear_vmcs_bit() to accidentally
clears the upper 32 bits of the requested VMCS field.
Other than that, this patch has no semantic change. Specifically this patch
is not meant to fix buggy narrowing operations, only to make these
operations explicit.
Tracked-On: #6776
Signed-off-by: Junjie Mao <junjie.mao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
IC_ADD_HV_VDEV -> ACRN_IOCTL_CREATE_VDEV
IC_REMOVE_HV_VDEV -> ACRN_IOCTL_DESTROY_VDEV
struct acrn_emul_dev -> struct acrn_vdev
Also, move struct acrn_vdev to acrn_common.h as this structure is used
by both DM and HV.
Tracked-On: #6282
Signed-off-by: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@intel.com>
For a pci BAR, its size aligned bits have fixed to 0(except the memory
type bits, they have another fixed value), they are read-only.
When write ~0U to BAR for sizing, (type_bits | size_mask) is written
into BAR.
So do not need to distinguish between sizing vBAR and programming vBAR.
When write a value to vBAR, always store (value & size_mask | type_bit)
to vfcg.
pci_vdev_read_vbar() is unnecessary, because it is only need to read
vcfg.
Tracked-On: #6011
Signed-off-by: Tao Yuhong <yuhong.tao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Li Fei <fei1.li@intel.com>
Instead of "#include <x86/foo.h>", use "#include <asm/foo.h>".
In other words, we are adopting the same practice in Linux kernel.
Tracked-On: #5920
Signed-off-by: Liang Yi <yi.liang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
Requires explicit arch path name in the include directive.
The config scripts was also updated to reflect this change.
Tracked-On: #5825
Signed-off-by: Peter Fang <peter.fang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Chen CJ <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
When wrong BAR address is set for pci-vuart, OS may assign a
new BAR address to it. Pci-vuart BAR can't be reprogrammed,
for its wrong fixed value. That can may because pci_vbar.fixed and
pci_vbar.type has overlap in abstraction, pci_vbar.fixed
has a confusing name, pci_vbar.type has PCIBAR_MEM64HI which is not
really a type of pci BARs.
So replace pci_vbar.type with pci_vbar.is_mem64hi, and change
pci_vbar.fixed to an union type with new name pci_vbar.bar_type.
Tracked-On: #5491
Signed-off-by: Tao Yuhong <yuhong.tao@intel.com>
Add cteate method for vmcs9900 vdev in hypercalls.
The destroy method of ivshmem is also suitable for other emulated vdev,
move it into hcall_destroy_vdev() for all emulated vdevs
Tracked-On: #5394
Signed-off-by: Tao Yuhong <yuhong.tao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang, Yu1 <yu1.wang@intel.com>
if vuart type is pci-vuart, then use MSI interrupt
split vuart_toggle_intr() control flow into vuart_trigger_level_intr() &
trigger_vmcs9900_msix(), because MSI is edge triggered, no deassertion
operation. Only trigger MSI for pci-vuart when assert interrupt.
Tracked-On: #5394
Signed-off-by: Tao Yuhong <yuhong.tao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang, Yu1 <yu1.wang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@Intel.com>
