"Real" clients use objectWithMeta to enforce support for meta.Object;
strictly speaking, fakes don't need this, but it's best to align them
with the real clients to ensure that fakes don't end up allowing types
that can't be used with the real clients.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
Kubernetes-commit: 736e5560ba6b21247c21f8ed12007e1d6d5fec1a
This adds a generic implementation of a fake clientset, and uses it to
replace the template code in generated fake clientsets for the default
methods. The templates are preserved as-is (or as close as they can
be) for use in extensions, whether for resources or subresources.
Fake clientsets with no extensions are reduced to their main getter,
their specific struct, and their constructor. All method
implementations are provided by the generic implementation. The
dedicated struct is preserved to allow extensions and expansions to be
defined where necessary.
Instead of handling the variants (with/without list, apply) with a
complex sequence of if statements, build up an index into an array
containing the various declarations.
Similarly, instead of calling different action constructors for
namespaced and non-namespaced clientsets, assume the current behaviour
of non-namespaced action creation (equivalent to creating a namespaced
action with an empty namespace) and document that assumption in the
action implementation.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
Kubernetes-commit: b0ce65df9b74d4dc72050840d5ad067596d7b822
