KEP-2593 proposed to expand the existing node-ipam controller
to be configurable via a ClusterCIDR objects, however, there
were reasonable doubts on the SIG about the feature and after
several months of dicussions we decided to not move forward
with the KEP intree, hence, we are going to remove the existing
code, that is still in alpha.
https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-sig-network/c/nts1xEZ--gQ/m/2aTOUNFFAAAJ
Change-Id: Ieaf2007b0b23c296cde333247bfb672441fe6dfc
Kubernetes-commit: c2d473f0d438cedab2f1831d23457d24961e0f4e
* Add custom match conditions for CEL admission
This PR is based off of, and dependent on the following PR:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116261
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* run `make update`
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Fix unit tests
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Fix unit tests
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Update compatibility test data
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Revert "Update compatibility test data"
This reverts commit 312ba7f9e74e0ec4a7ac1f07bf575479c608af28.
* Allow params during validation; make match conditions optional
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Add conditional ignoring of matcher CEL expression validation on update
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Run codegen
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Add more validation tests
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Short-circuit CEL matcher when no matchers specified
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Run codegen
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Address review comments
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
Kubernetes-commit: e5fd204c33e90a7e8f5a0ee70242f1296a5ec7af
* api changes adding match conditions
* feature gate and registry strategy to drop fields
* matchConditions logic for admission webhooks
* feedback
* update test
* import order
* bears.com
* update fail policy ignore behavior
* update docs and matcher to hold fail policy as non-pointer
* update matcher error aggregation, fix early fail failpolicy ignore, update docs
* final cleanup
* openapi gen
Kubernetes-commit: 5e5b3029f3bbfc93c3569f07ad300a5c6057fc58
This type should never have been shared between Service and Ingress.
The `ports` field is unfortunate, but it is needed to stay compatible.
Kubernetes-commit: 0153bfad16102e42d0b0dbb56742d0a6626e4180
* Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api, ClusterCIDRConfig type
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDRConfig` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
* Change ClusterCIDRConfig.NodeSelector type in api
* Fix review comments for API
* Update ClusterCIDRConfig API Spec
Introduce PerNodeHostBits field, remove PerNodeMaskSize
Kubernetes-commit: b9792a9daef4d978c5c30b6d10cbcdfa77a9b6ac
* Add FeatureGate PodHostIPs
* Add HostIPs field and update PodIPs field
* Types conversion
* Add dropDisabledStatusFields
* Add HostIPs for kubelet
* Add fuzzer for PodStatus
* Add status.hostIPs in ConvertDownwardAPIFieldLabel
* Add status.hostIPs in validEnvDownwardAPIFieldPathExpressions
* Downward API support for status.hostIPs
* Add DownwardAPI validation for status.hostIPs
* Add e2e to check that hostIPs works
* Add e2e to check that Downward API works
* Regenerate
Kubernetes-commit: 61b3c028ba618a939559c39befb546ae5e5fd0b9
* Implement status subresource in NetworkPolicy
* add NetworkPolicyStatus generated files
* Fix comments in netpol status review
Kubernetes-commit: 42a12010829962c6e87cee8e4bc217d39d7a8043
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
Kubernetes-commit: 11a25bfeb6fd6e8e5c42e316b17cea15a702041c
For tracking Job Pods that have finished but are not yet counted as failed or succeeded
And feature gate JobTrackingWithFinalizers
Change-Id: I3e080f3ec090922640384b692e88eaf9a544d3b5
Kubernetes-commit: bb56a0bd04891ae0a4aebeaeb4d145b32d9ad2d9
