It is used to request that a pod runs in a unique user namespace.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>
Kubernetes-commit: 9e9b23fd3ca6c0c58ee401b18a65422c0564bec0
- Run hack/update-codegen.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-device-plugin.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-protobuf.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-runtime.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-swagger-docs.sh
- Run hack/update-openapi-spec.sh
- Run hack/update-gofmt.sh
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Kubernetes-commit: a9593d634c6a053848413e600dadbf974627515f
* Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api, ClusterCIDRConfig type
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDRConfig` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
* Change ClusterCIDRConfig.NodeSelector type in api
* Fix review comments for API
* Update ClusterCIDRConfig API Spec
Introduce PerNodeHostBits field, remove PerNodeMaskSize
Kubernetes-commit: b9792a9daef4d978c5c30b6d10cbcdfa77a9b6ac
* Add FeatureGate PodHostIPs
* Add HostIPs field and update PodIPs field
* Types conversion
* Add dropDisabledStatusFields
* Add HostIPs for kubelet
* Add fuzzer for PodStatus
* Add status.hostIPs in ConvertDownwardAPIFieldLabel
* Add status.hostIPs in validEnvDownwardAPIFieldPathExpressions
* Downward API support for status.hostIPs
* Add DownwardAPI validation for status.hostIPs
* Add e2e to check that hostIPs works
* Add e2e to check that Downward API works
* Regenerate
Kubernetes-commit: 61b3c028ba618a939559c39befb546ae5e5fd0b9
* Implement status subresource in NetworkPolicy
* add NetworkPolicyStatus generated files
* Fix comments in netpol status review
Kubernetes-commit: 42a12010829962c6e87cee8e4bc217d39d7a8043
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
Kubernetes-commit: 11a25bfeb6fd6e8e5c42e316b17cea15a702041c
to keep a count of the pods that have the ready condition.
Also:
- Add feature gate JobReadyPods.
- Add Ready to describe.
Change-Id: Ib934730a430a8e2a2f485671e345fe2330006939
Kubernetes-commit: 1bff5eb44d9897e12aff3ea10f5a856580158278
