* Add custom match conditions for CEL admission
This PR is based off of, and dependent on the following PR:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/116261
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* run `make update`
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Fix unit tests
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Fix unit tests
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Update compatibility test data
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Revert "Update compatibility test data"
This reverts commit 312ba7f9e74e0ec4a7ac1f07bf575479c608af28.
* Allow params during validation; make match conditions optional
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Add conditional ignoring of matcher CEL expression validation on update
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Run codegen
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Add more validation tests
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Short-circuit CEL matcher when no matchers specified
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Run codegen
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
* Address review comments
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Max Smythe <smythe@google.com>
Kubernetes-commit: e5fd204c33e90a7e8f5a0ee70242f1296a5ec7af
* api changes adding match conditions
* feature gate and registry strategy to drop fields
* matchConditions logic for admission webhooks
* feedback
* update test
* import order
* bears.com
* update fail policy ignore behavior
* update docs and matcher to hold fail policy as non-pointer
* update matcher error aggregation, fix early fail failpolicy ignore, update docs
* final cleanup
* openapi gen
Kubernetes-commit: 5e5b3029f3bbfc93c3569f07ad300a5c6057fc58
This fixes the following warning (error?) in the apiserver:
E0126 18:10:38.665239 16370 fieldmanager.go:210] "[SHOULD NOT HAPPEN] failed to update managedFields" err="failed to convert new object (test/claim-84; resource.k8s.io/v1alpha1, Kind=ResourceClaim) to smd typed: .status.reservedFor: element 0: associative list without keys has an element that's a map type" VersionKind="/, Kind=" namespace="test" name="claim-84"
The root cause is the same as in e50e8a0c919c0e02dc9a0ffaebb685d5348027b4:
nothing in Kubernetes outright complains about a list of items where the item
type is comparable in Go, but not a simple type. This nonetheless isn't
supposed to be done in the API and can causes problems elsewhere.
For the ReservedFor field, everything seems to work okay except for the
warning. However, it's better to follow conventions and use a map. This is
possible in this case because UID is guaranteed to be a unique key.
Validation is now stricter than before, which is a good thing: previously,
two entries with the same UID were allowed as long as some other field was
different, which wasn't a situation that should have been allowed.
Kubernetes-commit: 508cd60760567b3832da748140e3cf782c1b8695
This type should never have been shared between Service and Ingress.
The `ports` field is unfortunate, but it is needed to stay compatible.
Kubernetes-commit: 0153bfad16102e42d0b0dbb56742d0a6626e4180
* Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api, ClusterCIDRConfig type
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDRConfig` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
* Change ClusterCIDRConfig.NodeSelector type in api
* Fix review comments for API
* Update ClusterCIDRConfig API Spec
Introduce PerNodeHostBits field, remove PerNodeMaskSize
Kubernetes-commit: b9792a9daef4d978c5c30b6d10cbcdfa77a9b6ac
* Add FeatureGate PodHostIPs
* Add HostIPs field and update PodIPs field
* Types conversion
* Add dropDisabledStatusFields
* Add HostIPs for kubelet
* Add fuzzer for PodStatus
* Add status.hostIPs in ConvertDownwardAPIFieldLabel
* Add status.hostIPs in validEnvDownwardAPIFieldPathExpressions
* Downward API support for status.hostIPs
* Add DownwardAPI validation for status.hostIPs
* Add e2e to check that hostIPs works
* Add e2e to check that Downward API works
* Regenerate
Kubernetes-commit: 61b3c028ba618a939559c39befb546ae5e5fd0b9
* Implement status subresource in NetworkPolicy
* add NetworkPolicyStatus generated files
* Fix comments in netpol status review
Kubernetes-commit: 42a12010829962c6e87cee8e4bc217d39d7a8043
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
Kubernetes-commit: 11a25bfeb6fd6e8e5c42e316b17cea15a702041c
