mirror of
https://github.com/confidential-containers/confidential-containers.git
synced 2025-10-21 07:22:38 +00:00
governance: Initial definition
* Roles defintion * Steering Committee initial composition * SC scope and Responsibilities Fixes #9 Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <samuel.e.ortiz@protonmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Samuel Ortiz
parent
23fb69a6dc
commit
2f895dd7bb
108
governance.md
Normal file
108
governance.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
||||
# Principles
|
||||
|
||||
The Confidential Containers is an open source organization and community that adheres to the following principles:
|
||||
|
||||
* Open - Confidential Containers is an open source project licensed under the [Apache License, Version 2.0](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0).
|
||||
We welcome all [contributions](https://github.com/confidential-containers/community/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
|
||||
* Respectful and welcoming - See our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/confidential-containers/community/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
|
||||
* Transparent - All discussions leading to contributions to the project should be open to all and done in public.
|
||||
There maybe exceptions for preliminary effort (e.g. security related work) but the point of disclosure will still lead to a transparent discussion in public, either through our GitHub repositories or public meetings.
|
||||
|
||||
# Projects
|
||||
|
||||
The Confidential Containers organization is composed of multiple projects.
|
||||
|
||||
A project is the primary unit of collaboration, therefore each project has its own repository and maintainers team.
|
||||
All projects follow the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/confidential-containers/community/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
|
||||
|
||||
# Community Members and Roles
|
||||
|
||||
Everyone is welcome to participate to the Confidential Containers projects, and there are 3 community member roles:
|
||||
|
||||
## Contributor
|
||||
|
||||
Anyone that contributed to one of the Confidential Containers projects within the last 12 months is a *Contributor*.
|
||||
Any merged Pull Request is considered a valid contribution.
|
||||
|
||||
Contributions are not limited to code alone.
|
||||
Adding or enhancing documentation, tests, tools, project artifacts are all valuable ways to contribute to a Confidential Containers project.
|
||||
|
||||
Project contributions will be reviewed by the project maintainers and should pass all applicable tests.
|
||||
|
||||
## Maintainer
|
||||
|
||||
Each project has one or more *Maintainer*.
|
||||
Project maintainers are first and foremost active *Contributors* to the project and are responsible for:
|
||||
|
||||
* Setting technical directions for the project.
|
||||
* Facilitating, reviewing and merging contributions.
|
||||
They have write access to the project repository.
|
||||
* Creating and assigning project issues.
|
||||
* Enforcing the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/confidential-containers/community/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
|
||||
|
||||
The list of maintainers for a project is defined by the project `CODEOWNERS` file placed at the top-level of each project's repository.
|
||||
|
||||
### Becoming a project maintainer
|
||||
|
||||
Existing maintainers may decide to elevate a *Contributor* to the *Maintainer* role based on the contributor established trust and contributions relevance.
|
||||
This decision process is not formally defined and is based on lazy consensus from the existing maintainers.
|
||||
|
||||
Any contributor may request for becoming a project maintainer by opening a pull request (PR) against the `CODEOWNERS` file, and adding *all* current maintainers as reviewer of the PR.
|
||||
Maintainers may also pro-actively promote contributors based on their contributions and leadership track record.
|
||||
|
||||
## Steering Committee Member
|
||||
|
||||
The Steering Committee (SC) is the overall Confidential Containers organization governing body.
|
||||
|
||||
The SC provides decision-making and strategic oversight for the project.
|
||||
It also defines and enforces the project values and structure.
|
||||
|
||||
### Scope and Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
The scope and responsibilites of the SC is subject to changes, and SC members must adapt it to meet the project needs.
|
||||
Moreover, any technical responsibilities should be delegated to project Maintainers, although the SC can be consulted to help the with making technical decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
Based on that, the SC is responsible for:
|
||||
|
||||
* Defining the project high-level strategy and roadmap
|
||||
* Managing and administrating the project, like e.g. preparing the weekly community meeting
|
||||
* Building and growing a transparent and inclusive Confidential Containers community
|
||||
* Onboarding and guiding Confidential Containers end-users
|
||||
|
||||
Further, as leaders in the community, the SC members will make themselves familiar with the material in the Linux Foundation's [Open Source Community Orientation](https://training.linuxfoundation.org/training/inclusive-open-source-community-orientation-lfc102/) in order to help grow a healthy community.
|
||||
|
||||
### Members
|
||||
|
||||
The initial composition of the SC is self-defined and is made of 10 members:
|
||||
|
||||
* Larry Dewey (@larrydewey) - AMD
|
||||
* Jiang Liu (@jiangliu) and Jia Zhang (@jiazhang0) - Alibaba
|
||||
* James Magowan (@magowan) and Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum (@fitzthum) - IBM
|
||||
* Peter Zhu (@peterzcst) and Dan Middleton (@dcmiddle) - Intel
|
||||
* Pradipta Banerjee (@bpradipt) and Ariel Adam (@ariel-adam) - Red Hat
|
||||
* Samuel Ortiz (@sameo)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Selection
|
||||
|
||||
The initial SC members will be responsible for defining how and when the SC membership can be expanded or renewed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision-making
|
||||
|
||||
The SC routinely makes decisions, technical or not, sometimes as a consulting request from project Maintainers or Contributors.
|
||||
|
||||
The SC decision-making process is [driven by consensus](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making), i.e. the SC will try to reach consensus through discussions and potentially many revisions iterations for any given proposal.
|
||||
The main goal is not to get full agreement from all SC members on a final decision, but rather for most people to only be left with minor objections.
|
||||
|
||||
Voting on a decision proposal should be used as a last resort solution, as it can potentially leave several SC members major concerns unaddressed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Meeting
|
||||
|
||||
The SC meets every other week. Meeting time may change depending on the composition of the SC, in order to adapt to SC members local time zones.
|
||||
The meeting is public and recorded, and follows a [publicly available agenda](https://docs.google.com/document/d/15epr-ZDmlIp-8jR0HQAaK0aXNddYp-gdwZnvUFQysLw/edit?usp=sharing).
|
||||
|
||||
The SC meeting scope is different from the weekly [Confidential Containers community meeting](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E3GLCzNgrcigUlgWAZYlgqNTdVwiMwCRTJ0QnJhLZGA/edit?usp=sharing), the latter being mostly focused on specific and technical details of one or more Confidential Containers project.
|
||||
|
||||
Each SC member is expected to attend the SC meetings, and the following guidelines are used to determine if quorum is reached:
|
||||
|
||||
* Quorum to meet is 1/2 (5/10)
|
||||
* Quorum to vote is 2/3 (7/10)
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user