- Move qualys-cloud-ag to the monitoring_binaries list
- Add a new list sendmail_config_binaries containing programs that can
modify files.
- Make parent_php_running_git a bit more generic for
parent_php_running_builds and add some additional sub-commands.
- Allow several combinations of scripting programs (ruby, python, etc.)
to run other build-ish commands.
- Let mysql_install_d(b) spawn shells and access sensitive files.
- Let qualys-cloud-ag(ent) spawn shells
- Add a few additional innocuous commandlines
- Let postfix setuid to itself
A new (empty) list user_known_container_shell_spawn_binaries allows
additional files to add additional programs that are allowed to spawn
shells in containers.
Add additional shell spawning command lines.
Allow package management binaries in containers--lots of people seem to
do it. Also allow pycompile/py3compile.
I need to refactor the shell spawners to more clearly isolate shell
spawners that we don't want to occur in a container from ones that can
run both inside and outside of a container.
A new falco.yaml option buffered_outputs, also controlled by
-U/--unbuffered, sets unbuffered outputs for the output methods. This is
especially useful with keep_alive files/programs where you want the
output right away.
Also add cleanup methods for the output channels that ensure output to
the file/program is flushed and closed.
Add the ability to keep file/program outputs open (i.e. writing to the
same open file/program for multiple notifications). A new option to the
file/program output "keep_alive", if true, keeps the file/program pipe
open across events.
This makes the need for unbuffered output aka
https://github.com/draios/falco/issues/211 more pressing. Will add that next.
When json output is set, add a sub-object called output_fields to the
json output that contains the individual templated fields from the
output string. Makes it easier to parse those fields.
This fixes https://github.com/draios/falco/issues/261.
These changes allow for a local rules file that will be preserved across
upgrades and allows the main rules file to be overwritten across upgrades.
- Move all config/rules files below /etc/falco/
- Add a "local rules" file /etc/falco/falco_rules.local.yaml. The intent
is that it contains modifications/deltas to the main rules file
/etc/falco/falco_rules.yaml. The main falco_rules.yaml should be
treated as immutable.
- All config files are flagged so they are not overwritten on upgrade.
- Change the handling of the config item "rules_file" in falco.yaml to
allow a list of files. By default, this list contains:
[/etc/falco/falco_rules.yaml, /etc/falco/falco_rules.local.yaml].
Also change rpm/debian packaging to ensure that the above files are
preserved across upgrades:
- Use relative paths for share/bin dirs. This ensures that when packaged
as rpms they won't be flagged as config files.
- Add CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX to FALCO_ENGINE_LUA_DIR now that it's relative.
- In debian packaging, flag
/etc/falco/{falco.yaml,falco_rules.yaml,falco_rules.local.yaml} as
conffiles. That way they are preserved across upgrades if modified.
- In rpm packaging when using cmake, any files installed with an
absolute path are automatically flagged as %config. The only files
directly installed are now the config files, so that addresses the problem.
Add CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX to lua dir.
Clean up the handling of priority levels within rules. It used to be a
mix of strings handled in various places. Now, in falco_common.h there's
a consistent type for priority-as-number as well as a list of
priority-as-string values. Priorities are passed around as numbers
instead of strings. It's still permissive about capitalization.
Also add the ability to load rules by severity. New falco
config option "priority=<val>"/-o priority=<val> specifies the minimum
priority level of rules that will be loaded.
Add unit tests for same. The test suppresses INFO notifications for a
rule/trace file combination that would otherwise generate them.
Add the ability to append to rules/macros, like we already do with
lists. For rules/macros, if the object has an append: true key, the
condition value is appended to the condition of an existing rule/macro
with the same name.
Like lists, it's an error to specify append: true without there being an
existing rule/macro.
Also add tests that test the same kind of things we did for lists:
- That append: true really does append
- That append: false overwrites the rule/macro
- That it's an error to append with a prior rule/macro existing.
