The tags synchronization is very slow for a non-mirror repository with
many tags especially forking. This PR make all repositories' tags
synchronization use the same function and remove the low performance
synchronization function. The commit count of tag now will not be stored
into database when syncing. Since the commits count will always be read
from cache or git data, the `NumCommits` in the release table will be
updated for the first read from git data.
* repository deletion, delete ephemeral runners with active tasks as
well skips regular cleanup
* user deletion, delete ephemeral runners with active tasks as well
skips regular cleanup
* delete ephemeral runners once status changes to done
* You no longer see used ephemeral runners after the task is done
* if you see one the cron job takes care of it
- Add support for filtering commits by date range via new "since" and
"until" parameters
- Update API endpoints and command logic to handle the new parameters
for fetching commits within given dates
- Extend API documentation and Swagger specs to describe the new "since"
and "until" query parameters
- Refactor related function signatures and implementations to accept and
pass "since" and "until" values
---------
Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
This PR changes 3rd party notifications wording on a PR review that
requests changes and can be considered a follow up for #5858 to also fix
#5857 in 3rd party notifications.
The difference in the actual notification would be the following:
```diff
- Pull request review rejected
+ Pull request review changes requested
```
While this is a simple string change at first look, it has a deeper UX
meaning.
# Motivation
We could observe that some developers are hesitant to press the "Request
changes" button since their peers first see that their changes were
rejected, thus a more appropriate wording that also falls in line with
the meaning and UI would be beneficial.
## Meaning
Pressing the `Request changes` button in a PR review means that as a
reviewer you are willing to merge the general change in a PR if changes
requested review comments are implemented.
Rejecting a PR on the other hand would be equivalent with closing it
since that change isn't welcome at all (e.g. out of scope feature).
## Sync with UI
The UI button says `request changes` and the other options
## Considered Problems
This might break some automation for users who rely on string matching.
* mssql does not support fetching 0 repositories
* remove paging by NumRepos that might be 0
* extend admin api test to purge user 2
Fixes#34448
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
In the comment editor, there is a bug in Firefox where the scroll
position unexpectedly moves up, which is annoying. This is not
reproducible in Chrome and Safari. To reproduce here are some steps:
- Go into an editable issue
- Scroll page to bottom
- Focus the textarea and press Return many times, causing the textarea
to get a scrollbar
- Scroll page to bottom again
- Press Return once more
- Page should not scroll up.
This fixes the bug by adding a temporary margin, and I verified it works
in all browsers.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
The "autofocus" was abused or misbehaved:
1. When users visit a page but they are not going to change a field,
then the field shouldn't get "autofocus"
* the "auth" / "user" page: in most cases, users do not want to change
the names
* see also the GitHub's "settings" page behavior.
2. There shouldn't be duplicate "autofocus" inputs in most cases, only
the first one focuses
3. When a panel is shown, the "autofocus" should get focus
* "add ssh key" panel
This PR fixes all these problems and by the way remove duplicate
"isElemHidden" function.
Issue: After switching the default branch, other branches are still
compared against the old default branch due to outdated divergence
cache.
Change: Clear the divergence cache in SetRepoDefaultBranch to ensure
correct comparisons against the new default branch.
Fixes#34369
Files that should be stored in LFS and are uploaded/edited from the API
or web UI aren't stored in LFS. This may be a regression from #34154.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR adds the label _state_ to the metric _gitea_users_. With the
change, _gitea_users_ would be reported like this:
```
...
# HELP gitea_users Number of Users
# TYPE gitea_users gauge
gitea_users{state="active"} 20
gitea_users{state="inactive"} 10
...
```
The metrics above would be from a Gitea instance with 30 user accounts.
20 of the accounts are active and 10 of the accounts are not active.
Resolve#34325
