If a test is failing during setup, makes no much sense to run the suite.
Let's skip and add some debug messages.
Signed-off-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>
Since yq frequently updates, let's upgrade to a version from February to
bypass potential issues with versions 4.41-4.43 for now. We can always
upgrade to the newest version if necessary.
Fixes#9354
Depends-on:github.com/kata-containers/tests#5818
Signed-off-by: Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>
Let's see if it helps with issues like:
```
error: must build at directory: not a valid directory: evalsymlink
failure on
'"/home/runner/actions-runner/_work/kata-containers/kata-containers/tests/functional/kata-deploy/../../..//tools/packaging/kata-deploy/kata-cleanup/overlays/k0s"'
: lstat
/home/runner/actions-runner/_work/kata-containers/kata-containers/tests/functional/kata-deploy/":
no such file or directory
```
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Currently, the checking for kata-deploy is running assume that the
daemonset scheduled at least one pod, however it might not had and the
kubectl wait command fails due to "error: no matching resources found".
On CI I've observed that fail intermittently. I suspect the service
account kata-deploy-sa take a while to show up then no kata-deploy is
scheduled in meanwhile.
Changed the checker logic to use waitForProcess() to keep testing if it is
already running, or hit the timeout (still 10m).
Fixes#9183
Signed-off-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
After kata-deploy has installed, check that the worker nodes
are still in Ready state and don't have a containerd://Unknown
container runtime versions, identicating that container isn't working
to ensure that we didn't corrupt the containerd config during kata-deploy's edits
Fixes: #8678
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
We'll be using exactly the same code used for the k8s tests, which are
already deploying k3s on GARM.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We just need to make sure the correct overlay is applied, following what
we already have been doing for k3s.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
So we have a better control on which flavour of kubernetes kata-deploy
is expected to be targetting.
This was also done as part of fa62a4c01b,
for the k8s tests.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Instead of doing this as part of the test itself, let's ensure it's done
before running the tests and during the tests cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This test, at least for now, only checks whether the runtimeclasses
have been properly created.
This is just a migration from a test we had as part of the k8s suite.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
By doing this we can make sure there won't be any clash on the cluster
name created for either the k8s or the kata-deploy tests.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This will have the same function as run-k8s-tests.sh has, but for
kata-deploy.
Right now it doesn't have any tests, and the command to actually run the
tests is commented out, but right now this is just a placeholder that
will be populated sooner than later.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Right now this file does nothing, as it's not even called by any GHA.
However, it'll be populated later on as part of a different series,
where we'll have kata-deploy specific tests running here.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
