An image `registry.k8s.io/hpa-example` only supports amd64.
Let's use a multi-arch image `quay.io/prometheus/prometheus`
for the QEMU example instead.
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
We've been appending to the wrong variable for quite some time, it
seems, leading to not actually regenerating the rootfs when needed.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED=y to restore previous kernel behaviour.
Kernel v6.8+ will by default block buffer writes to block devices mounted by filesystems.
This unfortunately is what we need to use mounted loop devices needed by some teams
to build OSIs and as an overlay backing store.
More info on this config item [here](https://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED.html)
Fixes: #10808
Signed-off-by: Simon Kaegi <simon.kaegi@gmail.com>
The tags created automatically for published Github releases
are probably not annotated, so by simply running `git describe` we are
not getting the correct tag. Use a `git describe --tags` to allow git
to look at all tags, not just annotated ones.
Signed-off-by: Anastassios Nanos <ananos@nubificus.co.uk>
IBM SE ensures to make initrd measured by genprotimg and verified by ultravisor.
Let's not build the measured rootf on s390x.
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
As we want to make sure a new builder image is generated if the rust
version is bumped.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Starting with version 1.80, the Rust linter does not accept an invalid
value for `target_arch` in configuration checks:
```
Compiling kata-sys-util v0.1.0 (/home/ddd/Work/kata/kata-containers/src/libs/kata-sys-util)
error: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `powerpc64le`
--> /home/ddd/Work/kata/kata-containers/src/libs/kata-sys-util/src/protection.rs:17:34
|
17 | #[cfg(any(target_arch = "s390x", target_arch = "powerpc64le"))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-------------
| |
| help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"powerpc64"`
|
= note: expected values for `target_arch` are: `aarch64`, `arm`, `arm64ec`, `avr`, `bpf`, `csky`, `hexagon`, `loongarch64`, `m68k`, `mips`, `mips32r6`, `mips64`, `mips64r6`, `msp430`, `nvptx64`, `powerpc`, `powerpc64`, `riscv32`, `riscv64`, `s390x`, `sparc`, `sparc64`, `wasm32`, `wasm64`, `x86`, and `x86_64`
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
= note: `-D unexpected-cfgs` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(unexpected_cfgs)]`
```
According [to GitHub user @Urgau][explain], this is a new warning
introduced in Rust 1.80, but the problem exists before. The correct
architecture name should be `powerpc64`, and the differentiation
between `powerpc64le` and `powerpc64` should use the `target_endian =
"little"` check.
[explain]: #10072 (comment)
Fixes: #10067
Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>
[emlima: fix some more occurences and typos]
Signed-off-by: Emanuel Lima <emlima@redhat.com>
[stevenhorsman: fix some more occurences and typos]
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
#10714 added support for building a specific commit,
but due to the clone only having `--depth=1`, we can only
reset to a commit if it's the latest on the `main` branch,
otherwise we will get:
```
+ git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd virtiofsd
Cloning into 'virtiofsd'...
warning: redirecting to https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd.git/
+ pushd virtiofsd
+ git reset --hard cecc61bca981ab42aae6ec490dfd59965e79025e
...
fatal: Could not parse object 'cecc61bca981ab42aae6ec490dfd59965e79025e'.
```
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Since we're defaulting to AGENT_INIT=no for all the initrd/images
adapt the NV build to properly get kata-agent installed.
Signed-off-by: Zvonko Kaiser <zkaiser@nvidia.com>
Otherwise a bump in the os name and / or os version would lead to the CI
using a cached artefact.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Right now we're hitting an interesting situation with osbuilder, where
regardless of what's being passed Ubuntu 20.04 (focal) is being used
when building the rootfs-image, as shown in the snippets of the logs
below:
```
ffidenci@tatu:~/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers$ make rootfs-image-confidential-tarball
/home/ffidenci/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/packaging/kata-deploy/local-build//kata-deploy-copy-libseccomp-installer.sh "agent"
make agent-tarball-build
...
make pause-image-tarball-build
...
make coco-guest-components-tarball-build
...
make kernel-confidential-tarball-build
...
make rootfs-image-confidential-tarball-build
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ffidenci/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers'
/home/ffidenci/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/packaging/kata-deploy/local-build//kata-deploy-binaries-in-docker.sh --build=rootfs-image-confidential
sha256:f16c57890b0e85f6e1bbe1957926822495063bc6082a83e6ab7f7f13cabeeb93
Build kata version 3.13.0: rootfs-image-confidential
INFO: DESTDIR /home/ffidenci/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/packaging/kata-deploy/local-build/build/rootfs-image-confidential/destdir
INFO: Create image
build image
~/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/osbuilder ~/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/packaging/kata-deploy/local-build/build/rootfs-image-confidential/builddir
INFO: Build image
INFO: image os: ubuntu
INFO: image os version: latest
Creating rootfs for ubuntu
/home/ffidenci/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/osbuilder/rootfs-builder/rootfs.sh -o 3.13.0-13f0807e9f5687d8e5e9a0f4a0a8bb57ca50d00c-dirty -r /home/ffidenci/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/packaging/kata-deploy/local-build/build/rootfs-image-confidential/builddir/rootfs-image/ubuntu_rootfs ubuntu
INFO: rootfs_lib.sh file found. Loading content
~/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/osbuilder/rootfs-builder/ubuntu ~/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/osbuilder
~/src/upstream/kata-containers/kata-containers/tools/osbuilder
INFO: rootfs_lib.sh file found. Loading content
INFO: build directly
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security InRelease [128 kB]
Get:2 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal InRelease [265 kB]
Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates InRelease [128 kB]
Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/restricted amd64 Packages [4276 kB]
Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports InRelease [128 kB]
Get:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages [11.3 MB]
Get:7 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/universe amd64 Packages [1297 kB]
Get:8 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/multiverse amd64 Packages [30.9 kB]
Get:9 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages [4187 kB]
Get:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/restricted amd64 Packages [33.4 kB]
Get:11 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages [1275 kB]
Get:12 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/multiverse amd64 Packages [177 kB]
Get:13 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 Packages [4663 kB]
Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/universe amd64 Packages [1589 kB]
Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages [34.6 kB]
Get:16 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/restricted amd64 Packages [4463 kB]
Get:17 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports/main amd64 Packages [55.2 kB]
Get:18 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports/universe amd64 Packages [28.6 kB]
Fetched 34.1 MB in 5s (6284 kB/s)
...
```
The reason this is happening is due to a few issues in different places:
1. IMG_OS_VERSION, passed to osbuilder, is not used anywhere and
OS_VERSION should be used instead. And we should break if OS_VERSION
is not properly passed down
2. Using UBUNTU_CODENAME is simply wrong, as it'll use whatever comes as
the base container from kata-deploy's local-build scripts, and it has
just been working by luck
Note that at the same time this commit fixes the wrong behaviour, it
would break the rootfses build as they are, this we need to set the
versions.yaml to use 20.04 were it was already using 20.04 even without
us knowing.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Let's make sure that we don't use Kata Containers' agent as init for the
Confidential related rootfses*, as we don't want to increase the agent's
complexity for no reason ... mainly when we can rely on a proper init
system.
*:
- images already used systemd as init
- initrds are now using systemd as init
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
With this change, `virtiofsd` (gnu target) could be built and then to be
used with other components.
Depends: #10741Fixes: #10739
Signed-off-by: Ruoqing He <heruoqing@iscas.ac.cn>
With ubuntu 20.04 image, virtiofsd gnu target couldn't be built due to
"unsupported ISA subset z" reported by "cc".
Updating to ubuntu 22.04 image addresses this problem.
Relates: #10739
Signed-off-by: Ruoqing He <heruoqing@iscas.ac.cn>
Right now we've been only building releases from virtiofsd, but we'll
need to pin a specific commit till v1.14.0 is out, thus let's add the
needed machinery to do so.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
The guest-components directory has been re-arranged slightly. Adjust the
installation path of the LUKS helper script to account for this.
Signed-off-by: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>
In order to check that we don't accidentally overwrite
release artifacts, we should add a check if the release
name already exists and bail if it does.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Building static binaries for aarch64 requires disabling PIE
We get an GOT overflow and the OS libraries are only build with fpic
and not with fPIC which enables unlimited sized GOT tables.
Signed-off-by: Zvonko Kaiser <zkaiser@nvidia.com>
