#10714 added support for building a specific commit,
but due to the clone only having `--depth=1`, we can only
reset to a commit if it's the latest on the `main` branch,
otherwise we will get:
```
+ git clone --depth 1 --branch main https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd virtiofsd
Cloning into 'virtiofsd'...
warning: redirecting to https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd.git/
+ pushd virtiofsd
+ git reset --hard cecc61bca981ab42aae6ec490dfd59965e79025e
...
fatal: Could not parse object 'cecc61bca981ab42aae6ec490dfd59965e79025e'.
```
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Right now we've been only building releases from virtiofsd, but we'll
need to pin a specific commit till v1.14.0 is out, thus let's add the
needed machinery to do so.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Based on messense/rust-musl-cross which offer cross build musl lib
environment to cross compile virtiofsd.
Fixes: #6557
Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
link-self-contained is not supported on ppc64le rust target.
Hence, do not pass it while building virtiofsd.
Fixes: #6195
Signed-off-by: Amulyam24 <amulmek1@in.ibm.com>
This Pr removes single spaces and fix the indentation of the script.
Fixes#5630
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
The compile option link-self-contained=yes asks rustc to use
C library startup object files that come with the compiler,
which are not available on the target s390x-unknown-linux-gnu.
A build does not contain any startup files leading to a
broken executable entry point (causing segmentation fault).
Fixes: #5522
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
When moving to building the CI artefacts using the kata-deploy scripts,
we've noticed that the build would fail on any machine where the tarball
wasn't officially provided.
This happens as rust is missing from the 1st layer container. However,
it's a very common practice to leave the 1st layer container with the
minimum possible dependencies and install whatever is needed for
building a specific component in a 2nd layer container, which virtiofsd
never had.
In this commit we introduce the second layer containers (yes,
comtainers), one for building virtiofsd using musl, and one for building
virtiofsd using glibc. The reason for taking this approach was to
actually simplify the scripts and avoid building the dependencies
(libseccomp, libcap-ng) using musl libc.
Fixes: #5425
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Based on @fidencio's opoinon,
On Arm: static build virtiofsd using musl lib;
on ppc64 & s390: static build virtiofsd using gnu lib;
Fixes: #4258
Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Right now this is very much x86_64 specific, but I'd like to count on
the maintainers of the other architectures to expand it.
Also, the name as it's now may be misleading, as we're actually only
pulling the binary that's statically built using `musl` and released as
part of virtiofsd official releases. But we'll need to build it for the
other architectures, thus I'm following the naming of the scripts used
by the other components.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>