I've noticed the following error when running the tests with SEV:
```
2025-01-21T17:10:28.7999896Z # @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8000614Z # @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8001217Z # @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8001857Z # IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY!
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8003009Z # Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)!
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8003348Z # It is also possible that a host key has just been changed.
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8004422Z # The fingerprint for the ED25519 key sent by the remote host is
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8005019Z # SHA256:x7wF8zI+LLyiwphzmUhqY12lrGY4gs5qNCD81f1Cn1E.
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8005459Z # Please contact your system administrator.
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8006734Z # Add correct host key in /home/kata/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message.
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8007031Z # Offending ED25519 key in /home/kata/.ssh/known_hosts:178
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8007254Z # remove with:
2025-01-21T17:10:28.8008172Z # ssh-keygen -f "/home/kata/.ssh/known_hosts" -R "10.244.0.71"
```
And this was causing a failure to ssh into the confidential pod.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Let's rename it to `is_confidential_runtime_class`, and adapt all the
places where it's called.
The new name provides a better description, leading to a better
understanding of what the function really does.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This has been introduced by 53bc4a432b,
where the condition was changed.
The correct condition is:
* If the list of supported tees does not contain the kata hypervisor
and the list of supported non tees does not contain the kata
hypervisor.
The error is that we were checking whether kata-hypervisor would contain
the list of supported tees, and that would almost always be false
(unless in the case where the list had an one and only one element).
Fixes: #9055 -- part II
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This PR adds the ability to run k8s confidential tests in a
non-TEE environment.
Fixes#9055
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
The existing confidential basic test titled `Test unencrypted
confidential container launch success and verify that we are
running in a secure enclave` has been updated to incorporate
IBM Secure Execution (`qemu-se`).
Previously, a secure image was absent from kata-deploy, hindering
the inclusion of IBM SE in the test.
Thanks to the #6755 update, it is now possible to test the TEE.
This modification extends the existing test by introducing
`qemu-se`. The specific changes are outlined below:
- Add an additional test `cc-se-e2e-tests` to s390x nightly
- Expansion of `REMOTE_COMMAND_PER_HYPERVISOR` for `qemu-se`
- Temporary exclusion of two test cases currently incompatible with IBM SE
(`cpu-ns` is a common issue across all TEEs, while `inotify`
will be addressed in a subsequent pull request).
Fixes: #8913
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
To become more resilient against these kinds of errors:
deployment.apps/confidential-unencrypted created
pod/confidential-unencrypted-c5fdd6964-rrb6q condition met
ssh: connect to host 10.42.0.109 port 22: Connection refused
Fixes: #8687
Signed-off-by: Dan Mihai <dmihai@microsoft.com>
Let's expand the confidential test to also support TDX.
The main difference on the test, though, is that we're not grepping for
a string in the `dmesg` output, but rather relying on `cpuid` to detect
a TDX guest.
Fixes: #7184
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Add a test case for the launch of unencrypted confidential
container, verifying that we are running inside a TEE.
Right now the test only works with SEV, but it'll be expanded in the
coming commits, as part of this very same series.
Fixes: #7184
Signed-Off-By: Unmesh Deodhar <udeodhar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
