At @danmihai1's suggestion add a die message in case
the call to setup_common fails, so we can see if in the test
output.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
There are many similar or duplicated code patterns in `teardown()`.
This commit consolidates them into a new function, `teardown_common()`,
which is now called within `teardown()`.
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
With #10232 merged, we now have a persistent node debugger pod throughout the test.
As a result, there’s no need to spawn another debugger pod using `kubectl debug`,
which could lead to false negatives due to premature pod termination, as reported
in #10081.
This commit removes the `print_node_journal()` call that uses `kubectl debug` and
instead uses `exec_host()` to capture the host journal. The `exec_host()` function
is relocated to `tests/integration/kubernetes/lib.sh` to prevent cyclical dependencies
between `tests_common.sh` and `lib.sh`.
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
We had a typo in the attestation tests that we've copied around a
lot and Wainer spotted it in the authenticated registry tests, so let's fix it up now
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
- Due to the error we hit with pulling the agnhost
image used in the liveness-probe tests, we want to leave
the console printing to help with debug when we next try
to bump the image-rs version
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
This test doesn't fail with the guest image pulling, but it for sure
should. :-)
We can see in the bats logs, something like:
```
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Scheduled 31s default-scheduler Successfully assigned kata-containers-k8s-tests/liveness-exec to 984fee00bd70.jf.intel.com
Normal Pulled 23s kubelet Successfully pulled image "quay.io/prometheus/busybox:latest" in 345ms (345ms including waiting)
Normal Started 21s kubelet Started container liveness
Warning Unhealthy 7s (x3 over 13s) kubelet Liveness probe failed: cat: can't open '/tmp/healthy': No such file or directory
Normal Killing 7s kubelet Container liveness failed liveness probe, will be restarted
Normal Pulled 7s kubelet Successfully pulled image "quay.io/prometheus/busybox:latest" in 389ms (389ms including waiting)
Warning Failed 5s kubelet Error: failed to create containerd task: failed to create shim task: the file /bin/sh was not found: unknown
Normal Pulling 5s (x3 over 23s) kubelet Pulling image "quay.io/prometheus/busybox:latest"
Normal Pulled 4s kubelet Successfully pulled image "quay.io/prometheus/busybox:latest" in 342ms (342ms including waiting)
Normal Created 4s (x3 over 23s) kubelet Created container liveness
Warning Failed 3s kubelet Error: failed to create containerd task: failed to create shim task: failed to mount /run/kata-containers/f0ec86fb156a578964007f7773a3ccbdaf60023106634fe030f039e2e154cd11/rootfs to /run/kata-containers/liveness/rootfs, with error: ENOENT: No such file or directory: unknown
Warning BackOff 1s (x3 over 3s) kubelet Back-off restarting failed container liveness in pod liveness-exec_kata-containers-k8s-tests(b1a980bf-a5b3-479d-97c2-ebdb45773eff)
```
Let's skip it for now as we have an issue opened to track it down:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/9665
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Use the "allow all" policy for k8s-liveness-probes.bats, instead of
relying on the Kata Guest image to use the same policy as its default.
Signed-off-by: Dan Mihai <dmihai@microsoft.com>
The first part of simplifying things to have all our tests using GitHub
actions is moving the k8s tests to this repo, as those will be the first
vict^W targets to be migrated to GitHub actions.
Those tests have been slightly adapted, mainly related to what they load
/ import, so they are more self-contained and do not require us bringing
a lot of scripts from the tests repo here.
A few scripts were also dropped along the way, as we no longer plan to
deploy kubernetes as part of every single run, but rather assume there
will always be k8s running whenever we land to run those tests.
It's important to mention that a few tests were not added here:
* k8s-block-volume:
* k8s-file-volume:
* k8s-volume:
* k8s-ro-volume:
These tests depend on some sort of volume being created on the
kubernetes node where the test will run, and this won't fly as the
tests will run from a GitHub runner, targetting a different machine
where kubernetes will be running.
* https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/6566
* k8s-hugepages: This test depends a whole lot on the host where it
lands and right now we cannot assume anything about that anymore, as
the tests will run from a GitHub runner, targetting a different
machine where kubernetes will be running.
* https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/6567
* k8s-expose-ip: This is simply hanging when running on AKS and has to
be debugged in order to figure out the root cause of that, and then
adapted to also work on AKS.
* https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/6578
Till those issues are solved, we'll keep running a jenkins job with
hose tests to avoid any possible regression.
Last but not least, I've decided to **not** keep the history when
bringing those tests here, otherwise we'd end up polluting a lot the
history of this repo, without any clear benefit on doing so.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
