It doesn't make much sense to test different VMMs as that wouldn't
trigger a different code path.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Start with a required smaller set of shellchecks
to try and prevent regressions whilst we fix
the current problems
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Ignore the vendor directories in our shellcheck
workflow as we can't fix them. If there is a way to
set this in shellcheckrc that would be better, but
it doesn't seem to be implemented yet.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
- As the metrics tests are largely independent
then allow subsequent tests to run even if previous
ones failed. The results might not be perfect if
clean-up is required, but we can work on that later.
- Move the test results check out of the latency
test that seems arbitrary and into it's own job step
- Add timeouts to steps that might fail/hang if there
are containerd/K8s issues
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Currently the run-metrics job runs a manual install
and does this in a separate job before the metrics
tests run. This doesn't make sense as if we have multiple
CI runs in parallel (like we often do), there is a high chance
that the setup for another PR runs between the metrics
setup and the runs, meaning it's not testing the correct
version of code. We want to remove this from happening,
so install (and delete to cleanup) kata as part of the metrics
test jobs.
Also switch to kata-deploy rather than manual install for
simplicity and in order to test what we recommend to users.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
The GitHub hosted runners for ARM64 do not provide virtualisation
support, thus we're just skipping the tests as those would check whether
or not the system is "VMContainerCapable".
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Since we have RISC-V builders available now, let's start with
`agent-ctl`, `trace-forwarder` and `genpolicy` components to run
build-checks on these `riscv-builder`s, and gradually add the rest
components when they are ready, to catch up with other architectures
eventually.
This workflow could be mannually triggered, `riscv-builder` will be the
default instance when that is the case.
Signed-off-by: Ruoqing He <heruoqing@iscas.ac.cn>
I noticed that CodeQl using the default config hasn't
scanned since May 2024, so figured it would be worth
trying an explicit configuration to see if that gets better results.
It's mostly the template, but updated to be more relevant:
- Only scan PRs and pushes to the `main` branch
- Set a pinned runner version rather than latest (with mac support)
- Edit the list of languages to be scanned to be more relevant
for kata-containers
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Currently the ci-on-push workflow that runs on PRs runs
two jobs: gatekeeper-skipper.yaml and ci.yaml. In order
to test things like for the error
```
too many workflows are referenced, total: 21, limit: 20
```
on topic branches, we need ci-devel.yaml to have an
extra workflow to match ci-on-push, so add the build-checks
as this is helpful to run on topic branches anyway.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Replace the four different publish workflows with
a single one that take input parameters of the arch
and runner, so reduce the amount of duplicated code
and try and avoid the
```
too many workflows are referenced, total: 21, limit: 20
```
error
Let's take advantege of the current arm64 runners, and make sure we have
those tests running there as well.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Zhao <kevin.zhao@linaro.org>
This is the first attempt to remove the following code:
```
if [ "${ARCH}" == "s390x" ]; then
export MEASURED_ROOTFS=no
fi
```
from install_shimv2() in kata-deploy-binaries.sh.
Signed-off-by: Hyounggyu Choi <Hyounggyu.Choi@ibm.com>
Phase 1 of Issue #10840
AMD has deprecated SEV support on
Kata Containers, and going forward,
SNP will be the only AMD feature
supported. As a first step in this
deprecation process, we are removing
the SEV CI workflow from the test suite
to unblock the CI.
Will be adding future commits to
remove redundant SEV code paths.
Signed-Off-By: Adithya Krishnan Kannan <AdithyaKrishnan.Kannan@amd.com>
A test case is added based on the intergrated cri-containerd case.
The difference between cri containerd integrated testcase and sandbox
api testcase is the "sandboxer" setting in the sandbox runtime handler.
If the "sandboxer" is set to "" or "podsandbox", then containerd will
use the legacy shimv2 api, and if the "sandboxer" is set to "shim", then
it will use the sandbox api to launch the pod.
In addition, add a containerd v2.0.0 version. Because containerd officially
supports the sandbox api from version 2.0.0.
Signed-off-by: Fupan Li <fupan.lfp@antgroup.com>
Otherwise we may end up simply unpacking kata-containers specific
binaries into the same location that system ones are needed, leading to
a broken system (most likely what happened with the metrics CI, and also
what's happening with the GHA runners).
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
We've been hitting issues with the CentOS 9 Stream machine, which Intel
doesn't have cycles to debug.
After raising this up in the Confidential Containers community meeting
we got the green light from Red Hat (Ariel Adam) to just disable the CI
based on CentOS 9 Stream for now.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@fidencio.org>
We introduced extratarballs with a make target. The CI
currently only uploads tarballs that are listed in the matrix.
The NV kernel builds a headers package which needs to be uploaded
as well.
The get-artifacts has a glob to download all artifacts hence we
should be good.
Signed-off-by: Zvonko Kaiser <zkaiser@nvidia.com>
I've also seen cases (the qemu, crio, k0s tests) where Delete kata-deploy is still
running for this test after 2 hours, and had to be manually
cancelled, so let's try adding a 5m timeout to the kata-deploy delete to stop CI jobs hanging.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Now we have the build-assets running on the gh-hosted
runners, try the same approach for the static-checks
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
The `Create AKS cluster` step in `run-k8s-tests-on-aks.yaml` is likely
to fail fail since we are trying to issue `PUT` to `aks` in a relatively
high frequency, while the `aks` end has it's limit on `bucket-size` and
`refill-rate`, documented here [1].
Use `nick-fields/retry@v3` to retry in 10 seconds after request fail,
based on observations that AKS were request 7, or 8 second delays
before retry as part of their 429 response
[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/quotas-skus-regions#throttling-limits-on-aks-resource-provider-apisFixes: #10772
Signed-off-by: Ruoqing He <heruoqing@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
While working on #10559, I realized that some parts of the codebase use
$GH_PR_NUMBER, while other parts use $PR_NUMBER.
Notably, in that PR, since I used $GH_PR_NUMBER for CoCo non-TEE tests
without realizing that TEE tests use $PR_NUMBER, the tests on that PR
fail on TEEs:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/actions/runs/12818127344/job/35744760351?pr=10559#step:10:45
...
44 error: error parsing STDIN: error converting YAML to JSON: yaml: line 90: mapping values are not allowed in this context
...
135 image: ghcr.io/kata-containers/csi-kata-directvolume:
...
So let's unify on $GH_PR_NUMBER so that this issue doesn't repro in the
future: I replaced all instances of PR_NUMBER with GH_PR_NUMBER.
Note that since some test scripts also refer to that variable, the CI
for this PR will fail (would have also happened with the converse
substitution), hence I'm not adding the ok-to-test label and we should
force-merge this after review.
Signed-off-by: Aurélien Bombo <abombo@microsoft.com>
Unsurprisingly now we've got passed the containerd test
hangs on the ppc64le, we are hitting others in the "Prepare the
self-hosted runner" stage, so add timeouts to all of them
to avoid CI blockages.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
Due to the agent-api tests requiring the agent to be deployed in the
CI by the tarball, so in the short-term lets only do this on the release
stage, so that both kata-manager works with the release and the
agent-api tests work with the other CI builds.
In the longer term we need to re-evaluate what is in our tarballs
(issue #10619), but want to unblock the tests in the short-term.
Fixes: #10630
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
With the code I originally did I think there is potentially
a case where we can get a failure due to timing of steps.
Before this change the `build-asset-shim-v2`
job could start the `get-artifacts` step and concurrently
`remove-rootfs-binary-artifacts` could run and delete the artifact
during the download and result in the error. In this commit, I
try to resolve this by making sure that the shim build waits
for the artifact deletes to complete before starting.
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
> A && B || C is not if-then-else. C may run when A is true
Refactor the echo so that we can't get into a situation where
the retry of workspace delete happens if the original one was
successful
Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
