de83cd9de7 tried to solve an issue, but it
clearly seems that I'm using env wrongly, as what ended up being passed
as input was "$VAR", instead of the content of the VAR variable.
As we can simply avoid using those here, let's do it and save us a
headache.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
It has to have steps declared, and we need to make it a dependency for
the nightly kata-containers-ci-on-push job.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Otherwise we'll get the following error from the workflow:
```
The workflow is not valid. .github/workflows/ci-on-push.yaml (Line: 24,
Col: 20): Unrecognized named-value: 'env'. Located at position 1 within
expression: env.COMMIT_HASH .github/workflows/ci-on-push.yaml (Line: 25,
Col: 18): Unrecognized named-value: 'env'. Located at position 1 within
expression: env.PR_NUMBER
```
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The idea is to mimic what's been done with Jenkins and the "Green CI"
effort, but now using our GHA and the GHA infrastructure.
Fixes: #7247
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This is based on the `ci-on-push.yaml` file, and it's called from ther
The reason to split on a new file is that we can easily introduce a
`ci-nightly.yaml` file and re-use the `ci.yaml` file there as well.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's ensure we're not relying, on any of the called workflows, on event
specific information.
Right now, the two information we've been relying on are:
* PR number, coming from github.event.pull_request.number
* Commit hash, coming from github.event.pull_request.head.sha
As we want to, in the future, add nightly jobs, which will be triggered
by a different event (thus, having different fields populated), we
should ensure that those are not used unless it's in the "top action"
that's trigerred by the event.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This PR enables storing metrics workflow artifacts in two
separated flavours: clh and qemu.
Fixes: #7239
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
This PR adds blogbench and webtooling metrics checks to this repo.
The function running the test intentionally returns zero, so
the test will be enabled in another PR once the workflow is
green.
Fixes: #7069
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
cargo/rust is installed in one step, we need to write the PATH update to
GITHUBENV so that it becomes visible in the next steps.
Fixes: #7221
Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@microsoft.com>
This PR adds memory foot print metrics to tests/metrics/density
folder.
Intentionally, each test exits w/ zero in all test cases to ensure
that tests would be green when added, and will be enabled in a
subsequent PR.
A workflow matrix was added to define hypervisor variation on
each job, in order to run them sequentially.
The launch-times test was updated to make use of the matrix
environment variables.
Fixes: #7066
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
We have GH configured so that manual approval is required for CI runs
triggered by outside contributors. However, because CI is triggered by
the `pull_request_target` event, this setting isn't being honored
(see [1]). This means that an attacker could trivially extracts secrets
by submitting a PR.
This change aims to mititgate this issue by preventing PRs from
triggering CI unless the `ok-to-test` label is set.
Note: For further context, we use the `pull_request_target` event and
manually check out the PR branch because it is the only way to both
access secrets and test incoming code changes.
Fixes: #7163
[1]: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks
Signed-off-by: Aurélien Bombo <abombo@microsoft.com>
This PR removes an unrecognized value located in one of the yamls for the
gha in order to make it work the CI again.
Fixes#7149
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
This PR installs kata static tarball on metrics runner
and run launch-times tests.
Fixes: #7049
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
This PR fixes the format for the run launchtimes metrics yaml which
is causing to the workflow to fail.
Fixes#7130
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
The run-launchtimes-metrics workflow needs to get the commit ID
for the last commit to the head branch of the PR.
Fixes: #7116
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
This gh-workflow prints a simple msg, but is the base for future
PRs that will gradually add the jobs corresponding to the kata
metrics test.
Fixes: #7100
Signed-off-by: David Esparza <david.esparza.borquez@intel.com>
Nobody has volunteered to maintain the (currently broken) snap build, so
remove it.
Fixes: #6769.
Signed-off-by: James O. D. Hunt <james.o.hunt@intel.com>
This adds the glibc flavor of CLH to the list of assets as preparation
for #6839. Mariner Kata is only tested with glibc.
Fixes: #7026
Signed-off-by: Aurélien Bombo <abombo@microsoft.com>
Github Actions reads and runs workflow files from the main branch,
rather than from the PR branch. This means that PRs that modify workflow
files aren't being tested with the updated workflows coming from the PR,
but rather with the old workflows from the main branch. AFAIK, this
behavior isn't avoidable for workflow files (but is for other scripts).
This makes it very hard to reliably test workflow changes before they're
actually merged into main and leads to issues that we have to hotifx
(see #6983, #6995).
This PR aims to mitigate that by extracting the commands used in
workflows to a separate script file. The way our CI is set up, those
script files are read from the PR branch and thus changes would be
reflected in the CI checks.
Fixes: #6971
Signed-off-by: Aurélien Bombo <abombo@microsoft.com>
Full SHA is 40 characters, while AKS cluster name has a limit of 63. Trim the
SHA to 12 characters, which is widely considered to be unique enough and is
short enough to be used in the cluster name
Fixes: #7010
Signed-off-by: Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@microsoft.com>
We added that to create the cluster name, but I forgot to add that to
the part we get the k8s config file, or to the part where we delete the
AKS cluster.
Fixes: #6999
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We need to do so, otherwise we'll create two clusters for testing Cloud
Hypervisor with exactly the same name, one using Ubuntu, and one using
Mariner.
Fixes: #6999
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The string representing the architecture aarch64 and x86_64 need to be changed to arm64 and amd64 for the release.
Fixes: #6986
Signed-off-by: SinghWang <wangxin_0611@126.com>
While the Mariner Kata host is in preview, we need the `aks-preview`
extension to enable the `--workload-runtime KataMshvVmIsolation` flag.
Fixes: #6994
Signed-off-by: Aurélien Bombo <abombo@microsoft.com>
The current testing setup only supports running Kata on top of an Ubuntu
host. This adds Mariner to the matrix of testable hosts for k8s
tests, with Cloud Hypervisor as a VMM.
As preparation for the upcoming PR that will change only the actual test
code (rather than workflow YAMLs), this also introduces a new file
`setup.sh` that will be used to set host-specific parameters at test
run-time.
Fixes: #6961
Signed-off-by: Aurélien Bombo <abombo@microsoft.com>
We're still facing issues related to the time taken to deploy the
kata-deplot daemonset and starting to run the tests.
Ideally, we should solve this with a readiness probe, and that's the
approach we want to take in the future. However, for now, let's just
make sure those tests are not on the way of the community.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We've seen tests being aborted close to the end of the run due to the
timeout. Let's increase it, avoiding to hit such cases again..
Fixes: #6964
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We previously were doing:
* Create a new image on kata-deploy-ci using the commit hash of the
latest tag
* This was used to test on AKS, which is no longer needed as we test
on AKS on every PR
* Create a new image on kata-deploy using the release tag and "latest"
or "stable", by tagging the kata-deploy-ci image accordingly
As part of cfe63527c5, we broke the
workflow described above, as in the first step we would save the PKG_SHA
to be used in the second step, but that part ended up being removed.
Anyways, this back and forth is not needed anymore and we can simplify
the process by doing:
* Create a new image on kata-deploy, using:
- The tag received as ref from the event that triggered this worklow
- "latest" or "stable" tag, depending on whether it's a stable release
or not
Fixes: #6946
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
For some bizarre reason, the login-action will simply fail to
authenticate to docker.io in it's specified as a registry. The way to
proceed, instead, is to *not* specify any registry as it'd be used by
default.
Fixes: #6943
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
`docker/login-action@v3` does *not* exist and `docker/login-action@v2`
should be used instead.
Fixes: #6934
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
fa832f4709 increased the timeout, which
helped a lot, mainly in the TEE machines. However, we're still seeing
some failures here and there with the AKS tests.
Let's bump it yet again and, hopefully, those errors to start the tests
will go away.
Fixes: #6905
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
GitHub is warning us that:
"""
The workflow is not valid. In .github/workflows/release.yaml (Line: 21,
Col: 11): Error from called workflow
kata-containers/kata-containers/.github/workflows/release-s390x.yaml@d2e92c9ec993f56537044950a4673e50707369b5
(Line: 14, Col: 12): Job 'kata-deploy' depends on unknown job
'create-kata-tarball'.
"""
This is happening as we need to reference
"build-kata-static-tarball-s390x" instead of "create-kata-tarball".
Fixes: #6903
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The "build-assets-${arch}" jobs need to have access to the secrets in
order to log into the container registry in the cases where
"push-to-registry", which is used to push the builder containers to
quay.io, is set to "yes".
Now that "build-assets-${arch}" pass the secrets down, we need to log
into the container registry in the "build-kata-static-tarball-${arch}"
files, in case "push-to-registry" is set to "yes".
Fixes: #6899
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
