We're hitting a specific issue after updating, which will require some
work on dragonball before it can be re-added here.
The issue:
```
...
3: failed to do rafs mount\\n
4: fail to attach rafs \\\"/var/lib/containerd-nydus/snapshots/2/fs/image/image.boot\\\"\\n
5: add share fs mount\\n
6: Mount rafs at
/rafs/197ef3db03c86b91bf3045ff59183ce8b5750941ad1d3484f4a8301a70f5109f/rootfs_lower
error: Failed to Mount backend
...
Caused by:
vmm action error: FsDevice(AttachBackendFailed(\\\"attach/detach a
backend filesystem failed:: missing field `version` at line 1 column
489\\\"))\"): unknown"
```
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This will ensure we're testing with the correct runtime, instead of
using the `default` one.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
To support the v0.12.0 nydus-snapshotter, we need to update the config
files and the commandline to start nydus-snapshotter.
Signed-off-by: ChengyuZhu6 <chengyu.zhu@intel.com>
And with this we finally enable the nydus tests to run as part of our
GHA CI.
Fixes: #6543
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We've been simply doing nothing whenever `install-kata` was called, and
that was the intent when we added the placeholder calls.
Now, let's install kata, as expected. :-)
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
As we've added install_nydus() and install_nydus_snapshotter(), which do
conform with the pattern we're following on GHA, let's rely on them
rather than relying on the bits coming from nydus_test.sh.
Later on we'll have install_nydus() and install_nydus_snapshotter() as
part of the dependencies install in our `gha-run.sh`.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Similarly to what's been done for the cri-containerd tests, as part of
84dd02e0f9, we need to add the timeout
here for the crictl calls.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Otherwise we may face errors like:
```
getting sandbox status of pod "d3af2db414ce8": metadata.Name,
metadata.Namespace or metadata.Uid is not in metadata
"&PodSandboxMetadata{Name:nydus-sandbox,Uid:,Namespace:default,Attempt:1,}"
getting sandbox status of pod "-A": rpc error: code = NotFound desc = an
error occurred when try to find sandbox: not found
```
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Otherwise we canoot properly start the nydus snapshotter, nor properly
kill it after it's been started.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The "source ..." we've been doing was not changed since those tests were
part of the Jenkins tests, and we need to adapt them, either setting the
correct path or entirely removing the ones that are not relevant to us
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let me start with a fair warning that this commit is hard to split into
different parts that could be easily tested (or not tested, just
ignored) without breaking pieces.
Now, about the commit itself, as we're on the run to reduce costs
related to our sponsorship on Azure, we can split the k8s tests we run
in 2 simple groups:
* Tests that can be run in the smaller Azure instance (D2s_v5)
* Tests that required the normal Azure instance (D4s_v5)
With this in mind, we're now passing to the tests which type of host
we're using, which allows us to select to run either one of the two
types of tests, or even both in case of running the tests on a baremetal
system.
Fixes: #7972
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The list of tests which require a bigger VM instance is:
* k8s-number-cpus.bats -- failing on all CIs
* k8s-parallel.bats -- only failing on the cbl-mariner CI
* k8s-scale-nginx.bats -- only failing on the cbl-mariner CI
We'll keep those disabled while we re-work the logic to **only run
those** in a bigger (and more expensive) VM instance.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Without setting the cpu limit / request to 1, we can make this test run
in a smaller VM instance without any issue.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Otherwise we'll fail to configure kata-containers in the `install-kata`
step.
This is mostly needed because the nerdctl-full tarball doesn't provide a
contaienrd configuration, just the binary, as contaienrd does not
actually require a configuration file to run with the default config.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
TIL that the Azure VMs we use are created without an explicit outbund
connectivity defined.
This leads us to issues using `ping ...` as part of our tests, and when
consulting Jeremi Piotrowski about the issue he pointed me out to two
interesting links:
* https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-network/ip-services/default-outbound-access
* https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/mast/use-port-pings-instead-of-icmp-to-test-azure-vm-connectivity
For your own sanity, do not read the comments, after all this is
internet. :-)
Anyways, the suggestion is to use nping instead, which is provided by
the nmap package, so we can explicitly switch to using the tcp port 80
for the ping. With this in mind, I'm switching the image we use for the
test and using one that provided nping as a possible entry point, and
from now on (this part of) the tests should work.
Fixes: #7910
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
TIL that the Azure VMs we use are created without an explicit outbund
connectivity defined.
This leads us to issues using `ping ...` as part of our tests, and when
consulting Jeremi Piotrowski about the issue he pointed me out to two
interesting links:
* https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-network/ip-services/default-outbound-access
* https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/mast/use-port-pings-instead-of-icmp-to-test-azure-vm-connectivity
For your own sanity, do not read the comments, after all this is
internet. :-)
Anyways, the suggestion is to use nping instead, which is provided by
the nmap package, so we can explicitly switch to using the tcp port 80
for the ping. With this in mind, I'm switching the image we use for the
test and using one that provided nping as a possible entry point, and
from now on (this part of) the tests should work.
Fixes: #7910
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Fix kernel and initrd annotations in the k8s tests on Mariner. These
annotations must be applied to the spec.template for Deployment, Job
and ReplicationController resources.
Fixes: #7764
Signed-off-by: Dan Mihai <dmihai@microsoft.com>
Let's add a very basic sanity test to check that we can spawn a
containers using nerdctl + Kata Containers.
This will ensure that, at least, we don't regress to the point where
this feature doesn't work at all.
In the future, we should also test all the VMMs with devmapper, but
that's for a follow-up PR after this test is working as expected.
Fixes: #7911
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's add a very basic sanity test to check that we can spawn a
containers using docker + Kata Containers.
This will ensure that, at least, we don't regress to the point where
this feature doesn't work at all.
For now we're running this test against Cloud Hypervisor and QEMU only,
due to an already reported issue with dragonball:
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/issues/7912
In the future, we should also test all the VMMs with devmapper, but
that's for a follow-up PR after this test is working as expected.
Fixes: #7910
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
There's absolutely no need to have the skip check as part of the test
itself when it's already done as part of the setup function.
We're only touching the files here that were touched in the previous
commit.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's keep both checks for now, but in the future we'll be able to
remove the check for "firecracker", as the hypervisor name used as part
of the GitHub Actions has to match what's used as part of the
kata-deploy stuff, which is `fc` (as in `kata-fc for the runtime class)
instead of `firecracker`.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We've been using the `kata-deploy-tdx` target as that also uses k3s as
base, but it's better to just have a specific garm target.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
So we have a better control on which flavour of kubernetes kata-deploy
is expected to be targetting.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
As we were using `tee` without the `-a` (or `--apend`) aptton, the
containerd config would be overwritten, leading to a NotReady state of
the Node.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Let's download the vanilla kubectl binary into `/usr/bin/`, as we need
to avoid hitting issues like:
```sh
error: open /etc/rancher/k3s/k3s.yaml.lock: permission denied
```
The issue basically happens because k3s links `/usr/local/bin/kubectl`
to `/usr/local/bin/k3s`, and that does extra stuff that vanilla
`kubectl` doesn't do.
Also, in order to properly use the k3s.yaml config with the vanilla
kubectl, we're copying it to ~/.kube/config.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Otherwise the /etc/rancher/k3s/k3s.yaml is not readable by other users
than root.
As --write-config-mode is being passed, and that's an option that has to
be passed to the `server`, -s is also added to the command line.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
`wait` waits for a job to complete, not a number of seconds. Not sure
how I got that wrong in the first place, but it's what it's.
Fixes: #6542
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This function right now is completely based on what's part of the tests
repo[0], and that's the reason I'm keeping the `Signed-off-by` of all
the contributors to that file.
This is not perfect, though, as it changes the default snapshotter to
devmapper, instead of only doing so for the Kata Containers specific
runtime handlers. OTOH, this is exactly what we've always been doing as
part of the tests.
We'll improve it, soon enough, when we get to also add a way for
kata-deploy to set up different snapshotters for different handlers.
But, for now, this is as good (or as bad) as it's always been.
It's important to note that the devmapper setup doesn't take into
consideration a BM machine, and this is not suitable for that. We're
really only targetting GHA runners which will be thrown away after the
run is over.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shiming Zhang <wzshiming@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
One can use different kubernetes flavours for getting a kubernetes
cluster up and running.
As part of our CI, though, I really would like to avoid contributors
spending time maintaining and updating kubernetes dependencies, as done
with the tests repo, and which has been proven to be really good on
getting things rotten.
With this in mind, I'm taking the bullet and using "k3s" as the way to
deploy kubernetes for the devmapper related tests, and that's the reason
I'm adding a function to do so, and this will be used later on as part
of this series.
It's important to note that the k3s setup doesn't take into
consideration a BM machine, and this is not suitable for that. We're
really only targetting GHA runners which will be thrown away after the
run is over.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Use AGENT_POLICY=yes when building the Guest images, and add a
permissive test policy to the k8s tests for:
- CBL-Mariner
- SEV
- SNP
- TDX
Also, add an example of policy rejecting ExecProcessRequest.
Fixes: #7667
Signed-off-by: Dan Mihai <dmihai@microsoft.com>
Let's expand the confidential test to also support TDX.
The main difference on the test, though, is that we're not grepping for
a string in the `dmesg` output, but rather relying on `cpuid` to detect
a TDX guest.
Fixes: #7184
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Add a test case for the launch of unencrypted confidential
container, verifying that we are running inside a TEE.
Right now the test only works with SEV, but it'll be expanded in the
coming commits, as part of this very same series.
Fixes: #7184
Signed-Off-By: Unmesh Deodhar <udeodhar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
k8s-pid-ns.bats was already using the test name from
k8s-kill-all-process-in-container.bats - probably a copy/paste bug.
Fixes: #7753
Signed-off-by: Dan Mihai <dmihai@microsoft.com>
By doing this we can make sure there won't be any clash on the cluster
name created for either the k8s or the kata-deploy tests.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
