This reverts commit 3018c9ad51.
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
If a hypervisor debug console is enabled and sandbox_cgroup_only is set,
the hypervisor can fail to open /dev/ptmx, which prevents the sandbox
from launching.
This is caused by the absence of a device cgroup entry to allow access
to /dev/ptmx. When sandbox_cgroup_only is not set, the hypervisor
inherits the default unrestrcited device cgroup, but with it enabled it
runs into allow / deny list restrictions.
Fix by adding an allowlist entry for /dev/ptmx when debug is enabled,
sandbox_cgroup_only is true, and no /dev/ptmx is already in the list of
devices.
Fixes: #6870
Signed-off-by: Krister Johansen <kjlx@templeofstupid.com>
This PR updates the container network model url that is part of the
virtcontainers documentation.
Fixes#6889
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
This reverts commit 20ab2c2420.
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This reverts commit f33345c311.
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This partially reverts commit 054174d3e6
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This reverts commit 25b3cdd38c.
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This reverts commit ed145365ec.
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This reverts commit 3c5ffb0c85.
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This reverts commit 3e15800199.
As the Jenkins TDX CI is running on a system with a TDX stack called
"2022ww44", we should keep the QEMU / kernel / OVMF versions matching
what's provided in that stack.
The reason we were able to update this on `main` is because the GHA TDX
CI is running on a TDX stack called "2023ww01", but we have decided to
NOT take the bullet, NOT updating the Jenkins CI in order to avoid
unexepected breakages.
This regression was introduced as part of the last CCv0 merge to main,
and would've been caught by the CI, and should've been caught by the
reviewer (myself :-)), but CI was having a hard time to even build the
compoenents and I wrote in the PR and I'm quoting it here: "I rather
deal with possible breakages on this later on, than block this PR to get
in." ... and here we are. :-)
Fixes: #6884
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
When this option is enabled the runtime will attempt to determine the
appropriate sandbox size (memory, CPU) before booting the virtual
machine.
As TEEs do not support memory and CPU hotplug, this approach must be
used.
Fixes: #6818
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
When this option is enabled the runtime will attempt to determine the
appropriate sandbox size (memory, CPU) before booting the virtual
machine.
As TEEs do not support memory and CPU hotplug, this approach must be
used.
Fixes: #6818
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
We like it or not, every now and then we'll have to deal with flaky
tests, and our tests using GHA are not exempt from that fact.
With this simple commit, we're trying to improve the reliability of the
tests in a few different fronts:
* Giving enough time for the script used by kata-deploy to be executed
* We've hit issues as the kata-deploy pod is considered "Ready" at the
moment it starts running, not when it finishes the needed setup. We
should also be looking on how to solve this on the kata-deploy side
but, for now, let's ensure our tests do not break with the current
kata-deploy behavior.
* Merging the "Deploy kata-deploy" and "Run tests" steps
* We've hit issues re-running tests and seeing even more failures than
the ones we're trying to debug, as a step will simply be taken as
succeeded as part of the re-run, in case it was successful executed
as part of the first run. This causes issues with the kata-deploy
deployment, as the tests would start running before even having the
node set up for running Kata Containers.
Fixes: #6865#6649
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
The AmdSev firmware package should be used with
measured direct boot. If the expected hashes are not
injected into the firmware binary by the VMM, the
guest will not boot. This is required for security.
Currently the main branch does not have the extended
shim support for SEV, which tells the VMM to inject
the expected hashes.
We ship the standard OVMF package to use with SNP,
so let's switch SEV to that for now. This will need
to be changed back when shim support for SEV(-ES)
is added to main.
Signed-off-by: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>
In order to populate containerd config file with
support for SEV, we need to add the qemu-sev shim
to the kata-deploy script.
Signed-off-by: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>
Currently Kata does not support memory / CPU hotplug for SEV or
SEV-SNP so we need to skip tests that rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>
Now that SEV artifacts are built by GHA, remove
conditional that skips tests when using qemu-sev.
Signed-off-by: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>
Now that we have SNP artifacts in place and they are built via gha,
remove the condition that skips the tests for SNP.
Fixes: #6809
Signed-off-by: Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>
As the TDX CI runs on k3s, we must ensure the cleanup, as already done
for the deploy, used the k3s overlay.
Fixes: #6857
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
This PR replaces single spaces to tabs in order to fix the
indentation of the rootfs script.
Fixes#6848
Signed-off-by: Gabriela Cervantes <gabriela.cervantes.tellez@intel.com>
We have been using the C version of virtiofsd on ppc64le. Now that the issue with
rust virtiofsd have been fixed, let's switch to it.
Fixes: #4259
Signed-off-by: Amulyam24 <amulmek1@in.ibm.com>
virtiofsd v1.6.1 has been released with the fixes required for running
successfully on ppc64le.
Fixes: #4259
Signed-off-by: Amulyam24 <amulmek1@in.ibm.com>
Supports both online and offline modes of interaction with simple-kbs
for SEV/SEV-ES confidential guests.
Fixes: #6795
Signed-off-by: Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
The sev package provides utilities for launching AMD SEV and SEV-ES
confidential guests.
Fixes: #6795
Signed-off-by: Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
Let's specifically name the `gpu` runtime class as `nvidia-gpu`. By
doing this we keep the door open and ease the life of the next vendor
adding GPU support for Kata Containers.
Fixes: #6553
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
