<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: UNVERSIONED_WARNING -->

<!-- BEGIN STRIP_FOR_RELEASE -->

<img src="http://kubernetes.io/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
     width="25" height="25">
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
     width="25" height="25">
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
     width="25" height="25">
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
     width="25" height="25">
<img src="http://kubernetes.io/img/warning.png" alt="WARNING"
     width="25" height="25">

<h2>PLEASE NOTE: This document applies to the HEAD of the source tree</h2>

If you are using a released version of Kubernetes, you should
refer to the docs that go with that version.

<!-- TAG RELEASE_LINK, added by the munger automatically -->
<strong>
The latest release of this document can be found
[here](http://releases.k8s.io/release-1.2/docs/devel/kubemark-guide.md).

Documentation for other releases can be found at
[releases.k8s.io](http://releases.k8s.io).
</strong>
--

<!-- END STRIP_FOR_RELEASE -->

<!-- END MUNGE: UNVERSIONED_WARNING -->

# Kubemark User Guide

## Introduction

Kubemark is a performance testing tool which allows users to run experiments on simulated clusters. The primary use case is scalability testing, as simulated clusters can be
much bigger than the real ones. The objective is to expose problems with the master components (API server, controller manager or scheduler) that appear only on bigger
clusters (e.g. small memory leaks).

This document serves as a primer to understand what Kubemark is, what it is not, and how to use it.

## Architecture

On a very high level Kubemark cluster consists of two parts: real master components and a set of “Hollow” Nodes. The prefix “Hollow” means an implementation/instantiation of a
component with all “moving” parts mocked out. The best example is HollowKubelet, which pretends to be an ordinary Kubelet, but does not start anything, nor mount any volumes -
it just lies it does. More detailed design and implementation details are at the end of this document.

Currently master components run on a dedicated machine(s), and HollowNodes run on an ‘external’ Kubernetes cluster. This design has a slight advantage, over running master
components on external cluster, of completely isolating master resources from everything else.

## Requirements

To run Kubemark you need a Kubernetes cluster for running all your HollowNodes and a dedicated machine for a master. Master machine has to be directly routable from
HollowNodes. You also need an access to some Docker repository.

Currently scripts are written to be easily usable by GCE, but it should be relatively straightforward to port them to different providers or bare metal.

## Common use cases and helper scripts

Common workflow for Kubemark is:
- starting a Kubemark cluster (on GCE)
- running e2e tests on Kubemark cluster
- monitoring test execution and debugging problems
- turning down Kubemark cluster

Included in descrptions there will be comments helpful for anyone who’ll want to port Kubemark to different providers.

### Starting a Kubemark cluster

To start a Kubemark cluster on GCE you need to create an external cluster (it can be GCE, GKE or any other cluster) by yourself, build a kubernetes release (e.g. by running
`make quick-release`) and run `test/kubemark/start-kubemark.sh` script. This script will create a VM for master components, Pods for HollowNodes and do all the setup necessary
to let them talk to each other. It will use the configuration stored in `cluster/kubemark/config-default.sh` - you can tweak it however you want, but note that some features
may not be implemented yet, as implementation of Hollow components/mocks will probably be lagging behind ‘real’ one. For performance tests interesting variables are
`NUM_NODES` and `MASTER_SIZE`. After start-kubemark script is finished you’ll have a ready Kubemark cluster, a kubeconfig file for talking to the Kubemark
cluster is stored in `test/kubemark/kubeconfig.loc`.

Currently we're running HollowNode with limit of 0.05 a CPU core and ~60MB or memory, which taking into account default cluster addons and fluentD running on an 'external'
cluster, allows running ~17.5 HollowNodes per core.

#### Behind the scene details:

Start-kubemark script does quite a lot of things:
- Creates a master machine called hollow-cluster-master and PD for it (*uses gcloud, should be easy to do outside of GCE*)
- Creates a firewall rule which opens port 443\* on the master machine (*uses gcloud, should be easy to do outside of GCE*)
- Builds a Docker image for HollowNode from the current repository and pushes it to the Docker repository (*GCR for us, using scripts from `cluster/gce/util.sh` - it may get
tricky outside of GCE*)
- Generates certificates and kubeconfig files, writes a kubeconfig locally to `test/kubemark/kubeconfig.loc` and creates a Secret which stores kubeconfig for HollowKubelet/
HollowProxy use (*used gcloud to transfer files to Master, should be easy to do outside of GCE*).
- Creates a ReplicationController for HollowNodes and starts them up. (*will work exactly the same everywhere as long as MASTER_IP will be populated correctly, but you’ll need
to update docker image address if you’re not using GCR and default image name*)
- Waits until all HollowNodes are in the Running phase (*will work exactly the same everywhere*)

<sub>\* Port 443 is a secured port on the master machine which is used for all external communication with the API server. In the last sentence *external* means all traffic
coming from other machines, including all the Nodes, not only from outside of the cluster. Currently local components, i.e. ControllerManager and Scheduler talk with API server using insecure port 8080.</sub>

### Running e2e tests on Kubemark cluster

To run standard e2e test on your Kubemark cluster created in the previous step you execute `test/kubemark/run-e2e-tests.sh` script. It will configure ginkgo to
use Kubemark cluster instead of something else and start an e2e test. This script should not need any changes to work on other cloud providers.

By default (if nothing will be passed to it) the script will run a Density '30 test. If you want to run a different e2e test you just need to provide flags you want to be
passed to `hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh` script, e.g. `--ginkgo.focus="Load"` to run the Load test.

By default, at the end of each test, it will delete namespaces and everything under it (e.g. events, replication controllers) on Kubemark master, which takes a lot of time.
Such work aren't needed in most cases: if you delete your Kubemark cluster after running `run-e2e-tests.sh`;
you don't care about namespace deletion performance, specifically related to etcd; etc.
There is a flag that enables you to avoid namespace deletion: `--delete-namespace=false`.
Adding the flag should let you see in logs: `Found DeleteNamespace=false, skipping namespace deletion!`

### Monitoring test execution and debugging problems

Run-e2e-tests prints the same output on Kubemark as on ordinary e2e cluster, but if you need to dig deeper you need to learn how to debug HollowNodes and how Master
machine (currently) differs from the ordinary one.

If you need to debug master machine you can do similar things as you do on your ordinary master. The difference between Kubemark setup and ordinary setup is that in Kubemark
etcd is run as a plain docker container, and all master components are run as normal processes. There’s no Kubelet overseeing them. Logs are stored in exactly the same place,
i.e. `/var/logs/` directory. Because binaries are not supervised by anything they won't be restarted in the case of a crash.

To help you with debugging from inside the cluster startup script puts a `~/configure-kubectl.sh` script on the master. It downloads `gcloud` and `kubectl` tool and configures
kubectl to work on unsecured master port (useful if there are problems with security). After the script is run you can use kubectl command from the master machine to play with
the cluster.

Debugging HollowNodes is a bit more tricky, as if you experience a problem on one of them you need to learn which hollow-node pod corresponds to a given HollowNode known by
the Master. During self-registeration HollowNodes provide their cluster IPs as Names, which means that if you need to find a HollowNode named `10.2.4.5` you just need to find a
Pod in external cluster with this cluster IP. There’s a helper script `test/kubemark/get-real-pod-for-hollow-node.sh` that does this for you.

When you have a Pod name you can use `kubectl logs` on external cluster to get logs, or use a `kubectl describe pod` call to find an external Node on which this particular
HollowNode is running so you can ssh to it.

E.g. you want to see the logs of HollowKubelet on which pod `my-pod` is running. To do so you can execute:

```
$ kubectl kubernetes/test/kubemark/kubeconfig.loc describe pod my-pod
```

Which outputs pod description and among it a line:

```
Node:				1.2.3.4/1.2.3.4
```

To learn the `hollow-node` pod corresponding to node `1.2.3.4` you use aforementioned script:

```
$ kubernetes/test/kubemark/get-real-pod-for-hollow-node.sh 1.2.3.4
```

which will output the line:

```
hollow-node-1234
```

Now you just use ordinary kubectl command to get the logs:

```
kubectl --namespace=kubemark logs hollow-node-1234
```

All those things should work exactly the same on all cloud providers.

### Turning down Kubemark cluster

On GCE you just need to execute `test/kubemark/stop-kubemark.sh` script, which will delete HollowNode ReplicationController and all the resources for you. On other providers
you’ll need to delete all this stuff by yourself.

## Some current implementation details

Kubemark master uses exactly the same binaries as ordinary Kubernetes does. This means that it will never be out of date. On the other hand HollowNodes use existing fake for
Kubelet (called SimpleKubelet), which mocks its runtime manager with `pkg/kubelet/fake-docker-manager.go`, where most logic sits. Because there’s no easy way of mocking other
managers (e.g. VolumeManager), they are not supported in Kubemark (e.g. we can’t schedule Pods with volumes in them yet).

As the time passes more fakes will probably be plugged into HollowNodes, but it’s crucial to make it as simple as possible to allow running a big number of Hollows on a single
core.


<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/docs/devel/kubemark-guide.md?pixel)]()
<!-- END MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
