github/kubernetes
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git synced 2025-07-31 15:25:57 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #125429 from tenzen-y/gurad-success-policy-by-feature-gate

Browse Source 
Job: Fix a bug that the SuccessCriteriaMet could be added to the Job with successPolicy regardless of the featureGate enabling
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Prow Robot 2024-06-11 14:43:44 -07:00 committed by GitHub
commit 02013fd127
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
3 changed files with 136 additions and 66 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

31
pkg/controller/job/job_controller_test.go
View File

@ -4531,6 +4531,37 @@ func TestSyncJobWithJobSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
"when the JobSuccessPolicy is disabled, the Job never got SuccessCriteriaMet condition even if the Job has the successPolicy field": {
job: batch.Job{
TypeMeta: validTypeMeta,
ObjectMeta: validObjectMeta,
Spec: batch.JobSpec{
Selector: validSelector,
Template: validTemplate,
CompletionMode: completionModePtr(batch.IndexedCompletion),
Parallelism: ptr.To[int32](3),
Completions: ptr.To[int32](3),
BackoffLimit: ptr.To[int32](math.MaxInt32),
SuccessPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
Rules: []batch.SuccessPolicyRule{{
SucceededIndexes: ptr.To("0,1"),
SucceededCount: ptr.To[int32](1),
}},
},
},
},
pods: []v1.Pod{
*buildPod().uid("a2").index("0").phase(v1.PodRunning).trackingFinalizer().Pod,
*buildPod().uid("b").index("1").phase(v1.PodSucceeded).trackingFinalizer().Pod,
*buildPod().uid("c").index("2").phase(v1.PodRunning).trackingFinalizer().Pod,
},
wantStatus: batch.JobStatus{
Active: 2,
Succeeded: 1,
CompletedIndexes: "1",
UncountedTerminatedPods: &batch.UncountedTerminatedPods{},
},
},
}
for name, tc := range testCases {
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {

2
pkg/controller/job/success_policy.go
View File

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ import (
)
func matchSuccessPolicy(logger klog.Logger, successPolicy *batch.SuccessPolicy, completions int32, succeededIndexes orderedIntervals) (string, bool) {
if successPolicy == nil || len(succeededIndexes) == 0 {
if !feature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.JobSuccessPolicy) || successPolicy == nil || len(succeededIndexes) == 0 {
return "", false
}

39
pkg/controller/job/success_policy_test.go
View File

@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ import (
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
batch "k8s.io/api/batch/v1"
"k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/util/feature"
featuregatetesting "k8s.io/component-base/featuregate/testing"
"k8s.io/klog/v2/ktesting"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/features"
"k8s.io/utils/ptr"
)
@ -32,17 +35,25 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
succeededIndexes orderedIntervals
wantMessage string
wantMetSuccessPolicy bool
enableJobSuccessPolicy bool
}{
"JobSuccessPolicy is disabled": {
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 0}},
},
"successPolicy is null": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 0}},
},
"any rules are nothing": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 0}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{Rules: []batch.SuccessPolicyRule{}},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is invalid format": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 0}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -52,6 +63,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes matched rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}, {4, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -63,6 +75,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMetSuccessPolicy: true,
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -72,6 +85,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededCount is specified; succeededIndexes matched rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -83,6 +97,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMetSuccessPolicy: true,
},
"rules.succeededCount is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -92,6 +107,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"multiple rules; rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes met one of rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}, {4, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -108,6 +124,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMetSuccessPolicy: true,
},
"multiple rules; rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes met all rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}, {4, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -124,6 +141,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMetSuccessPolicy: true,
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes met all rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}, {4, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -136,6 +154,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{0, 2}, {6, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -156,6 +175,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules is proper subset of succeededIndexes": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 5}, {6, 9}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -167,6 +187,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules equals succeededIndexes": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{2, 4}, {6, 9}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -178,6 +199,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules is subset of succeededIndexes": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{2, 5}, {7, 15}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -189,6 +211,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; rules is an empty set": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -198,6 +221,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; succeededIndexes is an empty set": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -207,6 +231,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; rules and succeededIndexes are empty set": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -216,6 +241,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; all elements of rules.succeededIndexes aren't included in succeededIndexes": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}, {5, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -225,6 +251,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; rules overlaps succeededIndexes at first": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{2, 4}, {6, 8}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -234,6 +261,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules overlaps succeededIndexes at first": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{2, 4}, {6, 8}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -246,6 +274,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; rules overlaps succeededIndexes at last": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}, {5, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -255,6 +284,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules overlaps succeededIndexes at last": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}, {5, 7}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -267,6 +297,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; rules completely overlaps succeededIndexes": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}, {7, 8}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -276,6 +307,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules completely overlaps succeededIndexes": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}, {7, 8}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -288,6 +320,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; rules overlaps multiple succeededIndexes at last": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}, {5, 9}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -297,6 +330,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules overlaps multiple succeededIndexes at last": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 3}, {5, 9}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -309,6 +343,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; rules overlaps succeededIndexes at first, and rules equals succeededIndexes at last": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 5}, {7, 10}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -318,6 +353,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; rules overlaps succeededIndexes at first, and rules equals succeededIndexes at last": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 5}, {7, 10}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -330,6 +366,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
wantMessage: "Matched rules at index 0",
},
"rules.succeededIndexes is specified; succeededIndexes didn't match rules; the first rules overlaps succeededIndexes at first": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 10}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -339,6 +376,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
},
},
"rules.succeededIndexes and rules.succeededCount are specified; succeededIndexes matched rules; the first rules overlaps succeededIndexes at first": {
enableJobSuccessPolicy: true,
completions: 10,
succeededIndexes: orderedIntervals{{1, 10}},
successPolicy: &batch.SuccessPolicy{
@ -353,6 +391,7 @@ func TestMatchSuccessPolicy(t *testing.T) {
}
for name, tc := range testCases {
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
featuregatetesting.SetFeatureGateDuringTest(t, feature.DefaultFeatureGate, features.JobSuccessPolicy, tc.enableJobSuccessPolicy)
logger := ktesting.NewLogger(t,
ktesting.NewConfig(
ktesting.BufferLogs(true),