From 91bd30dde2e8bbcb74354d266bb381722d98e91e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Klaus Ma <madaxa@cn.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:18:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Added InterPodAffinity unit test case with Namespace.

---
 .../algorithm/predicates/predicates_test.go   | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)

diff --git a/plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/predicates/predicates_test.go b/plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/predicates/predicates_test.go
index eeef2e0e406..1118c4842b4 100644
--- a/plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/predicates/predicates_test.go
+++ b/plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/predicates/predicates_test.go
@@ -2887,6 +2887,78 @@ func TestInterPodAffinityWithMultipleNodes(t *testing.T) {
 			test:   "NodeA and nodeB have same topologyKey and label value. NodeA has an existing pod that match the inter pod affinity rule. NodeC has an existing pod that match the inter pod affinity rule. The pod can not be scheduled onto nodeA, nodeB and nodeC but can be schedulerd onto nodeD",
 			nometa: true,
 		},
+		{
+			pod: &v1.Pod{
+				ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
+					Labels:    map[string]string{"foo": "123"},
+					Namespace: "NS1",
+				},
+				Spec: v1.PodSpec{
+					Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
+						PodAntiAffinity: &v1.PodAntiAffinity{
+							RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
+								{
+									LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
+										MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
+											{
+												Key:      "foo",
+												Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
+												Values:   []string{"bar"},
+											},
+										},
+									},
+									TopologyKey: "region",
+								},
+							},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			pods: []*v1.Pod{
+				{
+					ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
+						Labels:    map[string]string{"foo": "bar"},
+						Namespace: "NS1",
+					},
+					Spec: v1.PodSpec{NodeName: "nodeA"},
+				},
+				{
+					ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Namespace: "NS2"},
+					Spec: v1.PodSpec{
+						NodeName: "nodeC",
+						Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
+							PodAntiAffinity: &v1.PodAntiAffinity{
+								RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
+									{
+										LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
+											MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
+												{
+													Key:      "foo",
+													Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
+													Values:   []string{"123"},
+												},
+											},
+										},
+										TopologyKey: "region",
+									},
+								},
+							},
+						},
+					},
+				},
+			},
+			nodes: []v1.Node{
+				{ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "nodeA", Labels: labelRgChina}},
+				{ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "nodeB", Labels: labelRgChinaAzAz1}},
+				{ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "nodeC", Labels: labelRgIndia}},
+			},
+			fits: map[string]bool{
+				"nodeA": false,
+				"nodeB": false,
+				"nodeC": true,
+			},
+			test: "NodeA and nodeB have same topologyKey and label value. NodeA has an existing pod that match the inter pod affinity rule. The pod can not be scheduled onto nodeA, nodeB, but can be schedulerd onto nodeC (NodeC has an existing pod that match the inter pod affinity rule but in different namespace)",
+		},
 	}
 	affinityExpectedFailureReasons := []algorithm.PredicateFailureReason{ErrPodAffinityNotMatch}
 	selectorExpectedFailureReasons := []algorithm.PredicateFailureReason{ErrNodeSelectorNotMatch}