From baa5df2adac3819b6d2694a701f27eb74414eb16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bindata-mockuser Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 21:47:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Using Flaky as opposed to FLAKY --- test/e2e_node/disk_eviction_test.go | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/test/e2e_node/disk_eviction_test.go b/test/e2e_node/disk_eviction_test.go index e32231d4235..67fdec03bc2 100644 --- a/test/e2e_node/disk_eviction_test.go +++ b/test/e2e_node/disk_eviction_test.go @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ const ( // TODO: Leverage dynamic Kubelet settings when it's implemented to only modify the kubelet eviction option in this test. // To manually trigger the test on a node with disk space just over 15Gi : // make test-e2e-node FOCUS="hard eviction test" TEST_ARGS="--eviction-hard=nodefs.available<15Gi" -var _ = framework.KubeDescribe("Kubelet Eviction Manager [FLAKY] [Serial] [Disruptive]", func() { +var _ = framework.KubeDescribe("Kubelet Eviction Manager [Flaky] [Serial] [Disruptive]", func() { f := framework.NewDefaultFramework("kubelet-eviction-manager") var podClient *framework.PodClient var c *client.Client