github/kubernetes
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git synced 2025-07-24 12:15:52 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #55486 from sttts/sttts-psp-admission-annotation

Browse Source 
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54005, 55127, 53850, 55486, 53440). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.

admission: don't update psp annotation on update

Follow-up of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54689.

Related to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/55435 as istio-like initializer-based container injection cannot contribute to SC mutations.

```release-note
The PodSecurityPolicy annotation `kubernetes.io/psp` on pods is only set once on create.
```
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Submit Queue 2017-11-13 16:45:29 -08:00 committed by GitHub
commit 560a3109ca
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 25 additions and 19 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
plugin/pkg/admission/security/podsecuritypolicy/admission.go
View File

@ -119,11 +119,16 @@ func (c *PodSecurityPolicyPlugin) Admit(a admission.Attributes) error {
return nil
}
// only mutate if this is a CREATE request. On updates we only validate.
// TODO(liggitt): allow spec mutation during initializing updates?
if a.GetOperation() != admission.Create {
return nil
}
pod := a.GetObject().(*api.Pod)
// compute the context. If the current security context is valid, this call won't change it.
allowMutation := a.GetOperation() == admission.Create // TODO(liggitt): allow spec mutation during initializing updates?
allowedPod, pspName, validationErrs, err := c.computeSecurityContext(a, pod, allowMutation)
// compute the context
allowedPod, pspName, validationErrs, err := c.computeSecurityContext(a, pod, true)
if err != nil {
return admission.NewForbidden(a, err)
}
@ -134,10 +139,6 @@ func (c *PodSecurityPolicyPlugin) Admit(a admission.Attributes) error {
if pod.ObjectMeta.Annotations == nil {
pod.ObjectMeta.Annotations = map[string]string{}
}
// set annotation to mark this as passed. Note, that the actual value is not important, the
// validating PSP might even change later-on. Also not that pspName can be the empty string
// if failOnNoPolicies is false.
// TODO: if failOnNoPolicies is toggled from false to true, we will never update the annotation anymore. Is this desired?
pod.ObjectMeta.Annotations[psputil.ValidatedPSPAnnotation] = pspName
return nil
}
@ -156,7 +157,7 @@ func (c *PodSecurityPolicyPlugin) Validate(a admission.Attributes) error {
pod := a.GetObject().(*api.Pod)
// compute the context. If the current security context is valid, this call won't change it.
// compute the context. Mutation is not allowed.
allowedPod, _, validationErrs, err := c.computeSecurityContext(a, pod, false)
if err != nil {
return admission.NewForbidden(a, err)

27
plugin/pkg/admission/security/podsecuritypolicy/admission_test.go
View File

@ -329,6 +329,11 @@ func TestAdmitPreferNonmutating(t *testing.T) {
changedPod := unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy()
changedPod.Spec.Containers[0].Image = "myimage2"
podWithSC := unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy()
podWithSC.Annotations = map[string]string{psputil.ValidatedPSPAnnotation: privilegedPSP.Name}
changedPodWithSC := changedPod.DeepCopy()
changedPodWithSC.Annotations = map[string]string{psputil.ValidatedPSPAnnotation: privilegedPSP.Name}
gcChangedPod := unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy()
gcChangedPod.OwnerReferences = []metav1.OwnerReference{{Kind: "Foo", Name: "bar"}}
gcChangedPod.Finalizers = []string{"foo"}
@ -336,7 +341,7 @@ func TestAdmitPreferNonmutating(t *testing.T) {
tests := map[string]struct {
operation kadmission.Operation
pod *kapi.Pod
oldPod *kapi.Pod
podBeforeUpdate *kapi.Pod
psps []*extensions.PodSecurityPolicy
shouldPassAdmit bool
shouldPassValidate bool
@ -380,8 +385,8 @@ func TestAdmitPreferNonmutating(t *testing.T) {
},
"pod should prefer non-mutating PSP on update": {
operation: kadmission.Update,
pod: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
oldPod: changedPod.DeepCopy(),
pod: changedPodWithSC.DeepCopy(),
podBeforeUpdate: podWithSC.DeepCopy(),
psps: []*extensions.PodSecurityPolicy{mutating2, mutating1, privilegedPSP},
shouldPassAdmit: true,
shouldPassValidate: true,
@ -390,12 +395,12 @@ func TestAdmitPreferNonmutating(t *testing.T) {
expectedContainerUser: nil,
expectedPSP: privilegedPSP.Name,
},
"pod should not allow mutation on update": {
"pod should not mutate on update, but fail validation": {
operation: kadmission.Update,
pod: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
oldPod: changedPod.DeepCopy(),
pod: changedPod.DeepCopy(),
podBeforeUpdate: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
psps: []*extensions.PodSecurityPolicy{mutating2, mutating1},
shouldPassAdmit: false,
shouldPassAdmit: true,
shouldPassValidate: false,
expectMutation: false,
expectedPodUser: nil,
@ -405,7 +410,7 @@ func TestAdmitPreferNonmutating(t *testing.T) {
"pod should be allowed if completely unchanged on update": {
operation: kadmission.Update,
pod: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
oldPod: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
podBeforeUpdate: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
psps: []*extensions.PodSecurityPolicy{mutating2, mutating1},
shouldPassAdmit: true,
shouldPassValidate: true,
@ -416,8 +421,8 @@ func TestAdmitPreferNonmutating(t *testing.T) {
},
"pod should be allowed if unchanged on update except finalizers,ownerrefs": {
operation: kadmission.Update,
pod: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
oldPod: gcChangedPod.DeepCopy(),
pod: gcChangedPod.DeepCopy(),
podBeforeUpdate: unprivilegedRunAsAnyPod.DeepCopy(),
psps: []*extensions.PodSecurityPolicy{mutating2, mutating1},
shouldPassAdmit: true,
shouldPassValidate: true,
@ -429,7 +434,7 @@ func TestAdmitPreferNonmutating(t *testing.T) {
}
for k, v := range tests {
testPSPAdmitAdvanced(k, v.operation, v.psps, v.pod, v.oldPod, v.shouldPassAdmit, v.shouldPassValidate, v.expectMutation, v.expectedPSP, t)
testPSPAdmitAdvanced(k, v.operation, v.psps, v.pod, v.podBeforeUpdate, v.shouldPassAdmit, v.shouldPassValidate, v.expectMutation, v.expectedPSP, t)
if v.shouldPassAdmit {
actualPodUser := (*int64)(nil)