mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-07-21 10:51:29 +00:00
Merge pull request #19843 from ihmccreery/ga-features
Add docs about [Feature:...] tests for experimental, beta, and GA features
This commit is contained in:
commit
592ec2bb53
@ -112,7 +112,9 @@ We are working on implementing clearer partitioning of our e2e tests to make run
|
||||
- `[Disruptive]`: If a test restarts components that might cause other tests to fail or break the cluster completely, it is labeled `[Disruptive]`. Any `[Disruptive]` test is also assumed to qualify for the `[Serial]` label, but need not be labeled as both. These tests are not run against soak clusters to avoid restarting components.
|
||||
- `[Flaky]`: If a test is found to be flaky, it receives the `[Flaky]` label until it is fixed. A `[Flaky]` label should be accompanied with a reference to the issue for de-flaking the test, because while a test remains labeled `[Flaky]`, it is not monitored closely in CI. `[Flaky]` tests are by default not run, unless a `focus` or `skip` argument is explicitly given.
|
||||
- `[Skipped]`: `[Skipped]` is a legacy label that we're phasing out. If a test is marked `[Skipped]`, there should be an issue open to label it properly. `[Skipped]` tests are by default not run, unless a `focus` or `skip` argument is explicitly given.
|
||||
- `[Feature:...]`: If a test has non-default requirements to run or targets some non-core functionality, and thus should not be run as part of the standard suite, it receives a `[Feature:...]` label, e.g. `[Feature:Performance]` or `[Feature:Ingress]`. `[Feature:...]` tests are not run in our core suites, instead running in custom suites.
|
||||
- `[Feature:...]`: If a test has non-default requirements to run or targets some non-core functionality, and thus should not be run as part of the standard suite, it receives a `[Feature:...]` label, e.g. `[Feature:Performance]` or `[Feature:Ingress]`. `[Feature:...]` tests are not run in our core suites, instead running in custom suites. There are a few use-cases for `[Feature:...]` tests:
|
||||
- If a feature is experimental (i.e. in the `experimental` API or otherwise experimental), it should *not* block the merge-queue, and thus should run in some separate test suites owned by the feature owner(s).
|
||||
- If a feature is in beta or GA, it *should* block the merge-queue. In moving from experimental to beta or GA, tests that are expected to pass by default should simply remove the `[Feature:...]` label, and will be incorporated into our core suites. If tests are not expected to pass by default, (e.g. they require a special environment such as added quota,) they should remain with the `[Feature:...]` label, and the suites that run them should be incorporated into our merge-queue, owned by the Build Cop.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, `[Conformance]` tests are tests we expect to pass on **any** Kubernetes cluster. The `[Conformance]` label does not supersede any other labels. `[Conformance]` test policies are a work-in-progress; see #18162.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user