github/kubernetes
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git synced 2025-07-25 12:43:23 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tests: Updates the should delete a collection of pods test

Browse Source 
We should wait for all 3 pods after we've spawned them, instead of
spawning and waiting for them sequentially.
This commit is contained in:
Claudiu Belu 2022-03-06 09:55:32 -08:00
parent c964ef8d8a
commit 720ffb826a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
test/e2e/common/node/pods.go
View File

@ -866,14 +866,12 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("Pods", func() {
}}, metav1.CreateOptions{}) }}, metav1.CreateOptions{})
framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to create pod") framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to create pod")
framework.Logf("created %v", podTestName) framework.Logf("created %v", podTestName)
framework.ExpectNoError(e2epod.WaitForPodNameRunningInNamespace(f.ClientSet, podTestName, f.Namespace.Name))
framework.Logf("running and ready %v", podTestName)
} }
// wait as required for all 3 pods to be found // wait as required for all 3 pods to be running
ginkgo.By("waiting for all 3 pods to be located") ginkgo.By("waiting for all 3 pods to be running")
err := wait.PollImmediate(podRetryPeriod, podRetryTimeout, checkPodListQuantity(f, "type=Testing", 3)) err := e2epod.WaitForPodsRunningReady(f.ClientSet, f.Namespace.Name, 3, 0, framework.PodStartTimeout, nil)
framework.ExpectNoError(err, "3 pods not found") framework.ExpectNoError(err, "3 pods not found running.")
// delete Collection of pods with a label in the current namespace // delete Collection of pods with a label in the current namespace
err = f.ClientSet.CoreV1().Pods(f.Namespace.Name).DeleteCollection(context.TODO(), metav1.DeleteOptions{GracePeriodSeconds: &one}, metav1.ListOptions{ err = f.ClientSet.CoreV1().Pods(f.Namespace.Name).DeleteCollection(context.TODO(), metav1.DeleteOptions{GracePeriodSeconds: &one}, metav1.ListOptions{