Corrected some typos

This commit is contained in:
George Kuan
2015-04-26 19:37:14 -07:00
parent e061043cf1
commit 9f64d009e0
17 changed files with 25 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ might need later - but don't implement them now.
We understand that it is hard to imagine, but sometimes we make mistakes. It's
OK to push back on changes requested during a review. If you have a good reason
for doing something a certain way, you are absolutley allowed to debate the
for doing something a certain way, you are absolutely allowed to debate the
merits of a requested change. You might be overruled, but you might also
prevail. We're mostly pretty reasonable people. Mostly.
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ things you can do that might help kick a stalled process along:
* Ping the assignee (@username) on the PR comment stream asking for an
estimate of when they can get to it.
* Ping the assigneed by email (many of us have email addresses that are well
* Ping the assignee by email (many of us have email addresses that are well
published or are the same as our GitHub handle @google.com or @redhat.com).
If you think you have fixed all the issues in a round of review, and you haven't
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ explanation.
## Final: Use common sense
Obviously, none of these points are hard rules. There is no document that can
take the place of common sense and good taste. Use your best judgement, but put
take the place of common sense and good taste. Use your best judgment, but put
a bit of thought into how your work can be made easier to review. If you do
these things your PRs will flow much more easily.