Update: to use framework instead of gomega for testing values

This commit is contained in:
Caleb Woodbine 2020-01-07 00:56:19 +00:00
parent c5e3ab1248
commit ab12f460d9

View File

@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ import (
"encoding/base64" "encoding/base64"
"github.com/onsi/ginkgo" "github.com/onsi/ginkgo"
"github.com/onsi/gomega"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types" "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types"
) )
@ -159,7 +158,7 @@ var _ = ginkgo.Describe("[sig-api-machinery] Secrets", func() {
// list all secrets in namespace default // list all secrets in namespace default
secretsList, err := f.ClientSet.CoreV1().Secrets("").List(metav1.ListOptions{}) secretsList, err := f.ClientSet.CoreV1().Secrets("").List(metav1.ListOptions{})
framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to list secrets") framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to list secrets")
gomega.Expect(len(secretsList.Items)).ToNot(gomega.Equal(0), "no secrets found") framework.ExpectNotEqual(len(secretsList.Items), 0, "no secrets found")
foundCreatedSecret := false foundCreatedSecret := false
var secretCreatedName string var secretCreatedName string
@ -169,7 +168,7 @@ var _ = ginkgo.Describe("[sig-api-machinery] Secrets", func() {
secretCreatedName = val.ObjectMeta.Name secretCreatedName = val.ObjectMeta.Name
} }
} }
gomega.Expect(foundCreatedSecret).To(gomega.BeTrue(), "unable to find secret by its value") framework.ExpectEqual(foundCreatedSecret, true, "unable to find secret by its value")
ginkgo.By("patching the secret") ginkgo.By("patching the secret")
// patch the secret // patch the secret
@ -195,7 +194,7 @@ var _ = ginkgo.Describe("[sig-api-machinery] Secrets", func() {
foundCreatedSecret = true foundCreatedSecret = true
} }
} }
gomega.Expect(foundCreatedSecret).To(gomega.BeFalse(), "secret was not deleted successfully") framework.ExpectEqual(foundCreatedSecret, false, "secret was not deleted successfully")
}) })
}) })