Merge pull request #77844 from grayluck/one-more-ip

Add 198.51.100.0/24 to non-masq ranges.
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Prow Robot 2019-05-17 05:38:19 -07:00 committed by GitHub
commit af692da080
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ metadata:
kubernetes.io/cluster-service: "true"
addonmanager.kubernetes.io/mode: Reconcile
---
# https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/ip-masq-agent/blob/v2.3.0/README.md
# https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/ip-masq-agent/blob/v2.4.1/README.md
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: DaemonSet
metadata:
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ spec:
hostNetwork: true
containers:
- name: ip-masq-agent
image: k8s.gcr.io/ip-masq-agent-amd64:v2.3.0
image: k8s.gcr.io/ip-masq-agent-amd64:v2.4.1
args:
- --masq-chain=IP-MASQ
- --nomasq-all-reserved-ranges

View File

@ -101,13 +101,14 @@ function config-ip-firewall {
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 10.0.0.0/8 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 1918 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 172.16.0.0/12 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 1918 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 192.168.0.0/16 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 1918 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 100.64.0.0/10 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 6598 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 192.0.0.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 6890 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 240.0.0.0/4 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 5735 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 192.0.2.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 5737 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 192.88.99.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 7526 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 198.18.0.0/15 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 2544 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 198.51.100.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 5737 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 203.0.113.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 5737 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 240.0.0.0/4 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: Former Class E range obsoleted by RFC 3232 is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 100.64.0.0/10 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 6598 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 198.18.0.0/15 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 6815 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 192.0.0.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 6890 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -d 192.88.99.0/24 -m comment --comment "ip-masq: RFC 7526 reserved range is not subject to MASQUERADE" -j RETURN
iptables -w -t nat -A IP-MASQ -m comment --comment "ip-masq: outbound traffic is subject to MASQUERADE (must be last in chain)" -j MASQUERADE
fi