github/kubernetes
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git synced 2026-01-05 15:37:24 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #102344 from smarterclayton/keep_pod_worker

Browse Source 
Prevent Kubelet from incorrectly interpreting "not yet started" pods as "ready to terminate pods" by unifying responsibility for pod lifecycle into pod worker
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Prow Robot
2021-07-08 16:48:53 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 57716897eb 3eadd1a9ea
commit dab6f6a43d
33 changed files with 2065 additions and 1104 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
test/e2e/apps/statefulset.go
View File

@@ -756,6 +756,10 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("StatefulSet", func() {
}
pod, err = f.ClientSet.CoreV1().Pods(f.Namespace.Name).Create(context.TODO(), pod, metav1.CreateOptions{})
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
ginkgo.By("Waiting until pod " + podName + " will start running in namespace " + f.Namespace.Name)
if err := e2epod.WaitForPodNameRunningInNamespace(f.ClientSet, podName, f.Namespace.Name); err != nil {
framework.Failf("Pod %v did not start running: %v", podName, err)
}
ginkgo.By("Creating statefulset with conflicting port in namespace " + f.Namespace.Name)
ss := e2estatefulset.NewStatefulSet(ssName, f.Namespace.Name, headlessSvcName, 1, nil, nil, labels)
@@ -765,11 +769,6 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("StatefulSet", func() {
_, err = f.ClientSet.AppsV1().StatefulSets(f.Namespace.Name).Create(context.TODO(), ss, metav1.CreateOptions{})
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
ginkgo.By("Waiting until pod " + podName + " will start running in namespace " + f.Namespace.Name)
if err := e2epod.WaitForPodNameRunningInNamespace(f.ClientSet, podName, f.Namespace.Name); err != nil {
framework.Failf("Pod %v did not start running: %v", podName, err)
}
var initialStatefulPodUID types.UID
ginkgo.By("Waiting until stateful pod " + statefulPodName + " will be recreated and deleted at least once in namespace " + f.Namespace.Name)