mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-08-09 03:57:41 +00:00
Simplify nftables/proxier.go by removing partial syncing
Since optimization will be done differently in nftables.
This commit is contained in:
parent
39a5af1d0a
commit
e7c35d27f7
@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ import (
|
||||
v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
|
||||
discovery "k8s.io/api/discovery/v1"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/sets"
|
||||
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait"
|
||||
"k8s.io/client-go/tools/events"
|
||||
utilsysctl "k8s.io/component-helpers/node/util/sysctl"
|
||||
@ -153,7 +152,6 @@ type Proxier struct {
|
||||
// updating iptables with some partial data after kube-proxy restart.
|
||||
endpointSlicesSynced bool
|
||||
servicesSynced bool
|
||||
needFullSync bool
|
||||
initialized int32
|
||||
syncRunner *async.BoundedFrequencyRunner // governs calls to syncProxyRules
|
||||
syncPeriod time.Duration
|
||||
@ -265,7 +263,6 @@ func NewProxier(ipFamily v1.IPFamily,
|
||||
serviceChanges: proxy.NewServiceChangeTracker(newServiceInfo, ipFamily, recorder, nil),
|
||||
endpointsMap: make(proxy.EndpointsMap),
|
||||
endpointsChanges: proxy.NewEndpointsChangeTracker(hostname, newEndpointInfo, ipFamily, recorder, nil),
|
||||
needFullSync: true,
|
||||
syncPeriod: syncPeriod,
|
||||
iptables: ipt,
|
||||
masqueradeAll: masqueradeAll,
|
||||
@ -298,7 +295,7 @@ func NewProxier(ipFamily v1.IPFamily,
|
||||
proxier.syncRunner = async.NewBoundedFrequencyRunner("sync-runner", proxier.syncProxyRules, minSyncPeriod, time.Hour, burstSyncs)
|
||||
|
||||
go ipt.Monitor(kubeProxyCanaryChain, []utiliptables.Table{utiliptables.TableMangle, utiliptables.TableNAT, utiliptables.TableFilter},
|
||||
proxier.forceSyncProxyRules, syncPeriod, wait.NeverStop)
|
||||
proxier.syncProxyRules, syncPeriod, wait.NeverStop)
|
||||
|
||||
if ipt.HasRandomFully() {
|
||||
klog.V(2).InfoS("Iptables supports --random-fully", "ipFamily", ipt.Protocol())
|
||||
@ -606,7 +603,6 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) OnNodeAdd(node *v1.Node) {
|
||||
for k, v := range node.Labels {
|
||||
proxier.nodeLabels[k] = v
|
||||
}
|
||||
proxier.needFullSync = true
|
||||
proxier.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
klog.V(4).InfoS("Updated proxier node labels", "labels", node.Labels)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -631,7 +627,6 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) OnNodeUpdate(oldNode, node *v1.Node) {
|
||||
for k, v := range node.Labels {
|
||||
proxier.nodeLabels[k] = v
|
||||
}
|
||||
proxier.needFullSync = true
|
||||
proxier.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
klog.V(4).InfoS("Updated proxier node labels", "labels", node.Labels)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -649,7 +644,6 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) OnNodeDelete(node *v1.Node) {
|
||||
|
||||
proxier.mu.Lock()
|
||||
proxier.nodeLabels = nil
|
||||
proxier.needFullSync = true
|
||||
proxier.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
proxier.Sync()
|
||||
@ -731,17 +725,6 @@ func isServiceChainName(chainString string) bool {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Called by the iptables.Monitor, and in response to topology changes; this calls
|
||||
// syncProxyRules() and tells it to resync all services, regardless of whether the
|
||||
// Service or Endpoints/EndpointSlice objects themselves have changed
|
||||
func (proxier *Proxier) forceSyncProxyRules() {
|
||||
proxier.mu.Lock()
|
||||
proxier.needFullSync = true
|
||||
proxier.mu.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
proxier.syncProxyRules()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This is where all of the iptables-save/restore calls happen.
|
||||
// The only other iptables rules are those that are setup in iptablesInit()
|
||||
// This assumes proxier.mu is NOT held
|
||||
@ -755,27 +738,13 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The value of proxier.needFullSync may change before the defer funcs run, so
|
||||
// we need to keep track of whether it was set at the *start* of the sync.
|
||||
tryPartialSync := !proxier.needFullSync
|
||||
|
||||
// Keep track of how long syncs take.
|
||||
start := time.Now()
|
||||
defer func() {
|
||||
metrics.SyncProxyRulesLatency.Observe(metrics.SinceInSeconds(start))
|
||||
if tryPartialSync {
|
||||
metrics.SyncPartialProxyRulesLatency.Observe(metrics.SinceInSeconds(start))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
metrics.SyncFullProxyRulesLatency.Observe(metrics.SinceInSeconds(start))
|
||||
}
|
||||
klog.V(2).InfoS("SyncProxyRules complete", "elapsed", time.Since(start))
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
var serviceChanged, endpointsChanged sets.Set[string]
|
||||
if tryPartialSync {
|
||||
serviceChanged = proxier.serviceChanges.PendingChanges()
|
||||
endpointsChanged = proxier.endpointsChanges.PendingChanges()
|
||||
}
|
||||
serviceUpdateResult := proxier.svcPortMap.Update(proxier.serviceChanges)
|
||||
endpointUpdateResult := proxier.endpointsMap.Update(proxier.endpointsChanges)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -786,42 +755,25 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
if !success {
|
||||
klog.InfoS("Sync failed", "retryingTime", proxier.syncPeriod)
|
||||
proxier.syncRunner.RetryAfter(proxier.syncPeriod)
|
||||
if tryPartialSync {
|
||||
metrics.IptablesPartialRestoreFailuresTotal.Inc()
|
||||
}
|
||||
// proxier.serviceChanges and proxier.endpointChanges have already
|
||||
// been flushed, so we've lost the state needed to be able to do
|
||||
// a partial sync.
|
||||
proxier.needFullSync = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
if !tryPartialSync {
|
||||
// Ensure that our jump rules (eg from PREROUTING to KUBE-SERVICES) exist.
|
||||
// We can't do this as part of the iptables-restore because we don't want
|
||||
// to specify/replace *all* of the rules in PREROUTING, etc.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We need to create these rules when kube-proxy first starts, and we need
|
||||
// to recreate them if the utiliptables Monitor detects that iptables has
|
||||
// been flushed. In both of those cases, the code will force a full sync.
|
||||
// In all other cases, it ought to be safe to assume that the rules
|
||||
// already exist, so we'll skip this step when doing a partial sync, to
|
||||
// save us from having to invoke /sbin/iptables 20 times on each sync
|
||||
// (which will be very slow on hosts with lots of iptables rules).
|
||||
for _, jump := range append(iptablesJumpChains, iptablesKubeletJumpChains...) {
|
||||
if _, err := proxier.iptables.EnsureChain(jump.table, jump.dstChain); err != nil {
|
||||
klog.ErrorS(err, "Failed to ensure chain exists", "table", jump.table, "chain", jump.dstChain)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
args := jump.extraArgs
|
||||
if jump.comment != "" {
|
||||
args = append(args, "-m", "comment", "--comment", jump.comment)
|
||||
}
|
||||
args = append(args, "-j", string(jump.dstChain))
|
||||
if _, err := proxier.iptables.EnsureRule(utiliptables.Prepend, jump.table, jump.srcChain, args...); err != nil {
|
||||
klog.ErrorS(err, "Failed to ensure chain jumps", "table", jump.table, "srcChain", jump.srcChain, "dstChain", jump.dstChain)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Ensure that our jump rules (eg from PREROUTING to KUBE-SERVICES) exist.
|
||||
// We can't do this as part of the iptables-restore because we don't want
|
||||
// to specify/replace *all* of the rules in PREROUTING, etc.
|
||||
for _, jump := range append(iptablesJumpChains, iptablesKubeletJumpChains...) {
|
||||
if _, err := proxier.iptables.EnsureChain(jump.table, jump.dstChain); err != nil {
|
||||
klog.ErrorS(err, "Failed to ensure chain exists", "table", jump.table, "chain", jump.dstChain)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
args := jump.extraArgs
|
||||
if jump.comment != "" {
|
||||
args = append(args, "-m", "comment", "--comment", jump.comment)
|
||||
}
|
||||
args = append(args, "-j", string(jump.dstChain))
|
||||
if _, err := proxier.iptables.EnsureRule(utiliptables.Prepend, jump.table, jump.srcChain, args...); err != nil {
|
||||
klog.ErrorS(err, "Failed to ensure chain jumps", "table", jump.table, "srcChain", jump.srcChain, "dstChain", jump.dstChain)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -836,9 +788,6 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
proxier.natChains.Reset()
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Reset()
|
||||
|
||||
skippedNatChains := proxyutil.NewDiscardLineBuffer()
|
||||
skippedNatRules := proxyutil.NewDiscardLineBuffer()
|
||||
|
||||
// Write chain lines for all the "top-level" chains we'll be filling in
|
||||
for _, chainName := range []utiliptables.Chain{kubeServicesChain, kubeExternalServicesChain, kubeForwardChain, kubeNodePortsChain, kubeProxyFirewallChain} {
|
||||
proxier.filterChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(chainName))
|
||||
@ -1047,13 +996,9 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
filterRules := proxier.filterRules
|
||||
natChains := proxier.natChains
|
||||
natRules := proxier.natRules
|
||||
|
||||
// Capture the clusterIP.
|
||||
if hasInternalEndpoints {
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeServicesChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s cluster IP"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1062,7 +1007,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
"-j", string(internalTrafficChain))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// No endpoints.
|
||||
filterRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.filterRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeServicesChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", internalTrafficFilterComment,
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1077,7 +1022,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
if hasEndpoints {
|
||||
// Send traffic bound for external IPs to the "external
|
||||
// destinations" chain.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeServicesChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s external IP"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1089,7 +1034,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// Either no endpoints at all (REJECT) or no endpoints for
|
||||
// external traffic (DROP anything that didn't get
|
||||
// short-circuited by the EXT chain.)
|
||||
filterRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.filterRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeExternalServicesChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", externalTrafficFilterComment,
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1103,7 +1048,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// Capture load-balancer ingress.
|
||||
for _, lbip := range svcInfo.LoadBalancerVIPStrings() {
|
||||
if hasEndpoints {
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeServicesChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s loadbalancer IP"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1113,7 +1058,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
if usesFWChain {
|
||||
filterRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.filterRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeProxyFirewallChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s traffic not accepted by %s"`, svcPortNameString, svcInfo.firewallChainName),
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1127,7 +1072,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// external traffic (DROP anything that didn't get short-circuited
|
||||
// by the EXT chain.)
|
||||
for _, lbip := range svcInfo.LoadBalancerVIPStrings() {
|
||||
filterRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.filterRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeExternalServicesChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", externalTrafficFilterComment,
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1144,7 +1089,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// Jump to the external destination chain. For better or for
|
||||
// worse, nodeports are not subect to loadBalancerSourceRanges,
|
||||
// and we can't change that.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeNodePortsChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", svcPortNameString,
|
||||
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
|
||||
@ -1155,7 +1100,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// Either no endpoints at all (REJECT) or no endpoints for
|
||||
// external traffic (DROP anything that didn't get
|
||||
// short-circuited by the EXT chain.)
|
||||
filterRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.filterRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeExternalServicesChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", externalTrafficFilterComment,
|
||||
"-m", "addrtype", "--dst-type", "LOCAL",
|
||||
@ -1170,7 +1115,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
if svcInfo.HealthCheckNodePort() != 0 {
|
||||
// no matter if node has local endpoints, healthCheckNodePorts
|
||||
// need to add a rule to accept the incoming connection
|
||||
filterRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.filterRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(kubeNodePortsChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s health check node port"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
"-m", "tcp", "-p", "tcp",
|
||||
@ -1179,16 +1124,6 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the SVC/SVL/EXT/FW/SEP chains have not changed since the last sync
|
||||
// then we can omit them from the restore input. (We have already marked
|
||||
// them in activeNATChains, so they won't get deleted.) However, we have
|
||||
// to still figure out how many chains we _would_ have written to make the
|
||||
// metrics come out right, so we just compute them and throw them away.
|
||||
if tryPartialSync && !serviceChanged.Has(svcName.NamespacedName.String()) && !endpointsChanged.Has(svcName.NamespacedName.String()) {
|
||||
natChains = skippedNatChains
|
||||
natRules = skippedNatRules
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Set up internal traffic handling.
|
||||
if hasInternalEndpoints {
|
||||
args = append(args[:0],
|
||||
@ -1198,7 +1133,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
"--dport", strconv.Itoa(svcInfo.Port()),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if proxier.masqueradeAll {
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(internalTrafficChain),
|
||||
args,
|
||||
"-j", string(kubeMarkMasqChain))
|
||||
@ -1208,7 +1143,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// Service range, routing to any node, and that node will
|
||||
// bridge into the Service for you. Since that might bounce
|
||||
// off-node, we masquerade here.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(internalTrafficChain),
|
||||
args,
|
||||
proxier.localDetector.IfNotLocal(),
|
||||
@ -1221,12 +1156,12 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// jump to externalTrafficChain, which will handle some special cases and
|
||||
// then jump to externalPolicyChain.
|
||||
if usesExternalTrafficChain {
|
||||
natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(externalTrafficChain))
|
||||
proxier.natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(externalTrafficChain))
|
||||
|
||||
if !svcInfo.ExternalPolicyLocal() {
|
||||
// If we are using non-local endpoints we need to masquerade,
|
||||
// in case we cross nodes.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(externalTrafficChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"masquerade traffic for %s external destinations"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
"-j", string(kubeMarkMasqChain))
|
||||
@ -1239,7 +1174,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// traffic as a special-case. It is subject to neither
|
||||
// form of traffic policy, which simulates going up-and-out
|
||||
// to an external load-balancer and coming back in.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(externalTrafficChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"pod traffic for %s external destinations"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
proxier.localDetector.IfLocal(),
|
||||
@ -1249,7 +1184,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// Locally originated traffic (not a pod, but the host node)
|
||||
// still needs masquerade because the LBIP itself is a local
|
||||
// address, so that will be the chosen source IP.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(externalTrafficChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"masquerade LOCAL traffic for %s external destinations"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
"-m", "addrtype", "--src-type", "LOCAL",
|
||||
@ -1258,7 +1193,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// Redirect all src-type=LOCAL -> external destination to the
|
||||
// policy=cluster chain. This allows traffic originating
|
||||
// from the host to be redirected to the service correctly.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(externalTrafficChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"route LOCAL traffic for %s external destinations"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
"-m", "addrtype", "--src-type", "LOCAL",
|
||||
@ -1267,7 +1202,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
|
||||
// Anything else falls thru to the appropriate policy chain.
|
||||
if hasExternalEndpoints {
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(externalTrafficChain),
|
||||
"-j", string(externalPolicyChain))
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1275,7 +1210,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
|
||||
// Set up firewall chain, if needed
|
||||
if usesFWChain {
|
||||
natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(fwChain))
|
||||
proxier.natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(fwChain))
|
||||
|
||||
// The service firewall rules are created based on the
|
||||
// loadBalancerSourceRanges field. This only works for VIP-like
|
||||
@ -1290,7 +1225,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// firewall filter based on each source range
|
||||
allowFromNode := false
|
||||
for _, src := range svcInfo.LoadBalancerSourceRanges() {
|
||||
natRules.Write(args, "-s", src, "-j", string(externalTrafficChain))
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(args, "-s", src, "-j", string(externalTrafficChain))
|
||||
_, cidr, err := netutils.ParseCIDRSloppy(src)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
klog.ErrorS(err, "Error parsing CIDR in LoadBalancerSourceRanges, dropping it", "cidr", cidr)
|
||||
@ -1305,7 +1240,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// need the following rules to allow requests from this node.
|
||||
if allowFromNode {
|
||||
for _, lbip := range svcInfo.LoadBalancerVIPStrings() {
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
args,
|
||||
"-s", lbip,
|
||||
"-j", string(externalTrafficChain))
|
||||
@ -1314,7 +1249,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// If the packet was able to reach the end of firewall chain,
|
||||
// then it did not get DNATed, so it will match the
|
||||
// corresponding KUBE-PROXY-FIREWALL rule.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
"-A", string(fwChain),
|
||||
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"other traffic to %s will be dropped by KUBE-PROXY-FIREWALL"`, svcPortNameString),
|
||||
)
|
||||
@ -1323,15 +1258,15 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
// If Cluster policy is in use, create the chain and create rules jumping
|
||||
// from clusterPolicyChain to the clusterEndpoints
|
||||
if usesClusterPolicyChain {
|
||||
natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(clusterPolicyChain))
|
||||
proxier.writeServiceToEndpointRules(natRules, svcPortNameString, svcInfo, clusterPolicyChain, clusterEndpoints, args)
|
||||
proxier.natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(clusterPolicyChain))
|
||||
proxier.writeServiceToEndpointRules(svcPortNameString, svcInfo, clusterPolicyChain, clusterEndpoints, args)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If Local policy is in use, create the chain and create rules jumping
|
||||
// from localPolicyChain to the localEndpoints
|
||||
if usesLocalPolicyChain {
|
||||
natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(localPolicyChain))
|
||||
proxier.writeServiceToEndpointRules(natRules, svcPortNameString, svcInfo, localPolicyChain, localEndpoints, args)
|
||||
proxier.natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(localPolicyChain))
|
||||
proxier.writeServiceToEndpointRules(svcPortNameString, svcInfo, localPolicyChain, localEndpoints, args)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Generate the per-endpoint chains.
|
||||
@ -1345,13 +1280,13 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
endpointChain := epInfo.ChainName
|
||||
|
||||
// Create the endpoint chain
|
||||
natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(endpointChain))
|
||||
proxier.natChains.Write(utiliptables.MakeChainLine(endpointChain))
|
||||
activeNATChains[endpointChain] = true
|
||||
|
||||
args = append(args[:0], "-A", string(endpointChain))
|
||||
args = append(args, "-m", "comment", "--comment", svcPortNameString)
|
||||
// Handle traffic that loops back to the originator with SNAT.
|
||||
natRules.Write(
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(
|
||||
args,
|
||||
"-s", epInfo.IP(),
|
||||
"-j", string(kubeMarkMasqChain))
|
||||
@ -1361,7 +1296,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// DNAT to final destination.
|
||||
args = append(args, "-m", protocol, "-p", protocol, "-j", "DNAT", "--to-destination", epInfo.String())
|
||||
natRules.Write(args)
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(args)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1468,9 +1403,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
metrics.IptablesRulesTotal.WithLabelValues(string(utiliptables.TableFilter)).Set(float64(proxier.filterRules.Lines()))
|
||||
metrics.IptablesRulesLastSync.WithLabelValues(string(utiliptables.TableFilter)).Set(float64(proxier.filterRules.Lines()))
|
||||
metrics.IptablesRulesTotal.WithLabelValues(string(utiliptables.TableNAT)).Set(float64(proxier.natRules.Lines() + skippedNatRules.Lines() - deletedChains))
|
||||
metrics.IptablesRulesLastSync.WithLabelValues(string(utiliptables.TableNAT)).Set(float64(proxier.natRules.Lines() - deletedChains))
|
||||
metrics.IptablesRulesTotal.WithLabelValues(string(utiliptables.TableNAT)).Set(float64(proxier.natRules.Lines() - deletedChains))
|
||||
|
||||
// Sync rules.
|
||||
proxier.iptablesData.Reset()
|
||||
@ -1506,7 +1439,6 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
success = true
|
||||
proxier.needFullSync = false
|
||||
|
||||
for name, lastChangeTriggerTimes := range endpointUpdateResult.LastChangeTriggerTimes {
|
||||
for _, lastChangeTriggerTime := range lastChangeTriggerTimes {
|
||||
@ -1537,7 +1469,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
|
||||
conntrack.CleanStaleEntries(proxier.iptables.IsIPv6(), proxier.exec, proxier.svcPortMap, serviceUpdateResult, endpointUpdateResult)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (proxier *Proxier) writeServiceToEndpointRules(natRules proxyutil.LineBuffer, svcPortNameString string, svcInfo proxy.ServicePort, svcChain utiliptables.Chain, endpoints []proxy.Endpoint, args []string) {
|
||||
func (proxier *Proxier) writeServiceToEndpointRules(svcPortNameString string, svcInfo proxy.ServicePort, svcChain utiliptables.Chain, endpoints []proxy.Endpoint, args []string) {
|
||||
// First write session affinity rules, if applicable.
|
||||
if svcInfo.SessionAffinityType() == v1.ServiceAffinityClientIP {
|
||||
for _, ep := range endpoints {
|
||||
@ -1556,7 +1488,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) writeServiceToEndpointRules(natRules proxyutil.LineBuffe
|
||||
"--rcheck", "--seconds", strconv.Itoa(svcInfo.StickyMaxAgeSeconds()), "--reap",
|
||||
"-j", string(epInfo.ChainName),
|
||||
)
|
||||
natRules.Write(args)
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(args)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1579,6 +1511,6 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) writeServiceToEndpointRules(natRules proxyutil.LineBuffe
|
||||
"--probability", proxier.probability(numEndpoints-i))
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The final (or only if n == 1) rule is a guaranteed match.
|
||||
natRules.Write(args, "-j", string(epInfo.ChainName))
|
||||
proxier.natRules.Write(args, "-j", string(epInfo.ChainName))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ func NewFakeProxier(ipt utiliptables.Interface) *Proxier {
|
||||
serviceChanges: proxy.NewServiceChangeTracker(newServiceInfo, ipfamily, nil, nil),
|
||||
endpointsMap: make(proxy.EndpointsMap),
|
||||
endpointsChanges: proxy.NewEndpointsChangeTracker(testHostname, newEndpointInfo, ipfamily, nil, nil),
|
||||
needFullSync: true,
|
||||
iptables: ipt,
|
||||
masqueradeMark: "0x4000",
|
||||
localDetector: detectLocal,
|
||||
@ -6042,20 +6041,13 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced := countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric := countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rulesTotal := rulesSynced
|
||||
rulesTotal := countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesTotalMetric := countRulesFromMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesTotalMetric != rulesTotal {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules total but expected %d", rulesTotalMetric, rulesTotal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a new service and its endpoints. (This will only sync the SVC and SEP rules
|
||||
// for the new service, not the existing ones.)
|
||||
// Add a new service and its endpoints
|
||||
makeServiceMap(fp,
|
||||
makeTestService("ns3", "svc3", func(svc *v1.Service) {
|
||||
svc.Spec.Type = v1.ServiceTypeClusterIP
|
||||
@ -6103,7 +6095,11 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
:KUBE-MARK-MASQ - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-POSTROUTING - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-UHEGFW77JX3KXTOV - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-2VJB64SDSIJUP5T6 - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns2/svc2:p8080 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.42 --dport 8080 -j KUBE-SVC-2VJB64SDSIJUP5T6
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
@ -6114,17 +6110,19 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -s 10.0.1.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-UHEGFW77JX3KXTOV -m comment --comment ns2/svc2:p8080 -s 10.0.2.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-UHEGFW77JX3KXTOV -m comment --comment ns2/svc2:p8080 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.2.1:8080
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-2VJB64SDSIJUP5T6 -m comment --comment "ns2/svc2:p8080 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.42 --dport 8080 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-2VJB64SDSIJUP5T6 -m comment --comment "ns2/svc2:p8080 -> 10.0.2.1:8080" -j KUBE-SEP-UHEGFW77JX3KXTOV
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 -> 10.0.1.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
// We added 1 KUBE-SERVICES rule, 2 KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK rules, and 2
|
||||
// KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL rules.
|
||||
@ -6134,7 +6132,7 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules total but expected %d", rulesTotalMetric, rulesTotal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Delete a service. (Won't update the other services.)
|
||||
// Delete a service.
|
||||
fp.OnServiceDelete(svc2)
|
||||
fp.syncProxyRules()
|
||||
|
||||
@ -6156,8 +6154,12 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
:KUBE-SERVICES - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-MARK-MASQ - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-POSTROUTING - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-UHEGFW77JX3KXTOV - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-2VJB64SDSIJUP5T6 - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "kubernetes service nodeports; NOTE: this must be the last rule in this chain" -m addrtype --dst-type LOCAL -j KUBE-NODEPORTS
|
||||
@ -6165,17 +6167,19 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0x4000/0x4000 -j RETURN
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -j MARK --xor-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -s 10.0.1.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 -> 10.0.1.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO
|
||||
-X KUBE-SEP-UHEGFW77JX3KXTOV
|
||||
-X KUBE-SVC-2VJB64SDSIJUP5T6
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
// We deleted 1 KUBE-SERVICES rule, 2 KUBE-SVC-2VJB64SDSIJUP5T6 rules, and 2
|
||||
// KUBE-SEP-UHEGFW77JX3KXTOV rules
|
||||
@ -6185,12 +6189,9 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules total but expected %d", rulesTotalMetric, rulesTotal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a service, sync, then add its endpoints. (The first sync will be a no-op other
|
||||
// than adding the REJECT rule. The second sync will create the new service.)
|
||||
var svc4 *v1.Service
|
||||
// Add a service, sync, then add its endpoints.
|
||||
makeServiceMap(fp,
|
||||
makeTestService("ns4", "svc4", func(svc *v1.Service) {
|
||||
svc4 = svc
|
||||
svc.Spec.Type = v1.ServiceTypeClusterIP
|
||||
svc.Spec.ClusterIP = "172.30.0.44"
|
||||
svc.Spec.Ports = []v1.ServicePort{{
|
||||
@ -6220,6 +6221,10 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
:KUBE-SERVICES - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-MARK-MASQ - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-POSTROUTING - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "kubernetes service nodeports; NOTE: this must be the last rule in this chain" -m addrtype --dst-type LOCAL -j KUBE-NODEPORTS
|
||||
@ -6227,15 +6232,17 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0x4000/0x4000 -j RETURN
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -j MARK --xor-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -s 10.0.1.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 -> 10.0.1.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
// The REJECT rule is in "filter", not NAT, so the number of NAT rules hasn't
|
||||
// changed.
|
||||
@ -6277,7 +6284,11 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
:KUBE-MARK-MASQ - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-POSTROUTING - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK
|
||||
@ -6288,17 +6299,19 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -s 10.0.4.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.4.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -s 10.0.1.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 -> 10.0.4.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 -> 10.0.1.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
// We added 1 KUBE-SERVICES rule, 2 KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK rules, and
|
||||
// 2 KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU rules
|
||||
@ -6308,8 +6321,7 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules total but expected %d", rulesTotalMetric, rulesTotal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Change an endpoint of an existing service. This will cause its SVC and SEP
|
||||
// chains to be rewritten.
|
||||
// Change an endpoint of an existing service.
|
||||
eps3update := eps3.DeepCopy()
|
||||
eps3update.Endpoints[0].Addresses[0] = "10.0.3.2"
|
||||
fp.OnEndpointSliceUpdate(eps3, eps3update)
|
||||
@ -6333,9 +6345,13 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
:KUBE-SERVICES - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-MARK-MASQ - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-POSTROUTING - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK
|
||||
@ -6344,20 +6360,22 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0x4000/0x4000 -j RETURN
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -j MARK --xor-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -s 10.0.4.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.4.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.2 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.2:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -s 10.0.1.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 -> 10.0.4.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.2:80" -j KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 -> 10.0.1.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO
|
||||
-X KUBE-SEP-BSWRHOQ77KEXZLNL
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
// We rewrote existing rules but did not change the overall number of rules.
|
||||
rulesTotalMetric = countRulesFromMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
@ -6365,7 +6383,7 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules total but expected %d", rulesTotalMetric, rulesTotal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add an endpoint to a service. This will cause its SVC and SEP chains to be rewritten.
|
||||
// Add an endpoint to a service.
|
||||
eps3update2 := eps3update.DeepCopy()
|
||||
eps3update2.Endpoints = append(eps3update2.Endpoints, discovery.Endpoint{Addresses: []string{"10.0.3.3"}})
|
||||
fp.OnEndpointSliceUpdate(eps3update, eps3update2)
|
||||
@ -6389,9 +6407,13 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
:KUBE-SERVICES - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-MARK-MASQ - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-POSTROUTING - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK
|
||||
@ -6400,22 +6422,24 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0x4000/0x4000 -j RETURN
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -j MARK --xor-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -s 10.0.4.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.4.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.2 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.2:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.3 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.3:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -s 10.0.1.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 -> 10.0.4.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.2:80" -m statistic --mode random --probability 0.5000000000 -j KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.3:80" -j KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 -> 10.0.1.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
// We added 2 KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS rules and 1 KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK rule
|
||||
// jumping to the new SEP chain. The other rules related to svc3 got rewritten,
|
||||
@ -6429,97 +6453,6 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Sync with no new changes... This will not rewrite any SVC or SEP chains
|
||||
fp.syncProxyRules()
|
||||
|
||||
expected = dedent.Dedent(`
|
||||
*filter
|
||||
:KUBE-NODEPORTS - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SERVICES - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-EXTERNAL-SERVICES - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-FIREWALL - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-FORWARD - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-PROXY-FIREWALL - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-FIREWALL -m comment --comment "block incoming localnet connections" -d 127.0.0.0/8 ! -s 127.0.0.0/8 -m conntrack ! --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED,DNAT -j DROP
|
||||
-A KUBE-FORWARD -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID -j DROP
|
||||
-A KUBE-FORWARD -m comment --comment "kubernetes forwarding rules" -m mark --mark 0x4000/0x4000 -j ACCEPT
|
||||
-A KUBE-FORWARD -m comment --comment "kubernetes forwarding conntrack rule" -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
*nat
|
||||
:KUBE-NODEPORTS - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-SERVICES - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-MARK-MASQ - [0:0]
|
||||
:KUBE-POSTROUTING - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "kubernetes service nodeports; NOTE: this must be the last rule in this chain" -m addrtype --dst-type LOCAL -j KUBE-NODEPORTS
|
||||
-A KUBE-MARK-MASQ -j MARK --or-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0x4000/0x4000 -j RETURN
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -j MARK --xor-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// (No changes)
|
||||
rulesTotalMetric = countRulesFromMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesTotalMetric != rulesTotal {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules total but expected %d", rulesTotalMetric, rulesTotal)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Now force a partial resync error and ensure that it recovers correctly
|
||||
if fp.needFullSync {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Proxier unexpectedly already needs a full sync?")
|
||||
}
|
||||
prFailures, err := testutil.GetCounterMetricValue(metrics.IptablesPartialRestoreFailuresTotal)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Could not get partial restore failures metric: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if prFailures != 0.0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Already did a partial resync? Something failed earlier!")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Add a rule jumping from svc3's service chain to svc4's endpoint, then try to
|
||||
// delete svc4. This will fail because the partial resync won't rewrite svc3's
|
||||
// rules and so the partial restore would leave a dangling jump from there to
|
||||
// svc4's endpoint. The proxier will then queue a full resync in response to the
|
||||
// partial resync failure, and the full resync will succeed (since it will rewrite
|
||||
// svc3's rules as well).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This is an absurd scenario, but it has to be; partial resync failures are
|
||||
// supposed to be impossible; if we knew of any non-absurd scenario that would
|
||||
// cause such a failure, then that would be a bug and we would fix it.
|
||||
if _, err := fp.iptables.ChainExists(utiliptables.TableNAT, utiliptables.Chain("KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU")); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("svc4's endpoint chain unexpected already does not exist!")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := fp.iptables.EnsureRule(utiliptables.Append, utiliptables.TableNAT, utiliptables.Chain("KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK"), "-j", "KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU"); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Could not add bad iptables rule: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fp.OnServiceDelete(svc4)
|
||||
fp.syncProxyRules()
|
||||
|
||||
if _, err := fp.iptables.ChainExists(utiliptables.TableNAT, utiliptables.Chain("KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU")); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Errorf("svc4's endpoint chain was successfully deleted despite dangling references!")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !fp.needFullSync {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Proxier did not fail on previous partial resync?")
|
||||
}
|
||||
updatedPRFailures, err := testutil.GetCounterMetricValue(metrics.IptablesPartialRestoreFailuresTotal)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Could not get partial restore failures metric: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if updatedPRFailures != prFailures+1.0 {
|
||||
t.Errorf("Partial restore failures metric was not incremented after failed partial resync (expected %.02f, got %.02f)", prFailures+1.0, updatedPRFailures)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// On retry we should do a full resync, which should succeed (and delete svc4)
|
||||
fp.syncProxyRules()
|
||||
|
||||
expected = dedent.Dedent(`
|
||||
*filter
|
||||
:KUBE-NODEPORTS - [0:0]
|
||||
@ -6547,37 +6480,32 @@ func TestSyncProxyRulesRepeated(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
:KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O - [0:0]
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK
|
||||
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "kubernetes service nodeports; NOTE: this must be the last rule in this chain" -m addrtype --dst-type LOCAL -j KUBE-NODEPORTS
|
||||
-A KUBE-MARK-MASQ -j MARK --or-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0x4000/0x4000 -j RETURN
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -j MARK --xor-mark 0x4000
|
||||
-A KUBE-POSTROUTING -m comment --comment "kubernetes service traffic requiring SNAT" -j MASQUERADE
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -s 10.0.4.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU -m comment --comment ns4/svc4:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.4.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.2 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.2:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -s 10.0.3.3 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS -m comment --comment ns3/svc3:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.3.3:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -s 10.0.1.1 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO -m comment --comment ns1/svc1:p80 -m tcp -p tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.1.1:80
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.44 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK -m comment --comment "ns4/svc4:p80 -> 10.0.4.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.43 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.2:80" -m statistic --mode random --probability 0.5000000000 -j KUBE-SEP-DKCFIS26GWF2WLWC
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-X27LE4BHSL4DOUIK -m comment --comment "ns3/svc3:p80 -> 10.0.3.3:80" -j KUBE-SEP-JVVZVJ7BSEPPRNBS
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 cluster IP" -m tcp -p tcp -d 172.30.0.41 --dport 80 ! -s 10.0.0.0/8 -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
|
||||
-A KUBE-SVC-XPGD46QRK7WJZT7O -m comment --comment "ns1/svc1:p80 -> 10.0.1.1:80" -j KUBE-SEP-SNQ3ZNILQDEJNDQO
|
||||
-X KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU
|
||||
-X KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK
|
||||
COMMIT
|
||||
`)
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), false, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
assertIPTablesRulesEqual(t, getLine(), true, expected, fp.iptablesData.String())
|
||||
|
||||
rulesSynced = countRules(utiliptables.TableNAT, expected)
|
||||
rulesSyncedMetric = countRulesFromLastSyncMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesSyncedMetric != rulesSynced {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules synced but iptables data shows %d", rulesSyncedMetric, rulesSynced)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We deleted 1 KUBE-SERVICES rule, 2 KUBE-SVC-4SW47YFZTEDKD3PK rules, and 2
|
||||
// KUBE-SEP-AYCN5HPXMIRJNJXU rules
|
||||
rulesTotal -= 5
|
||||
// (No changes)
|
||||
rulesTotalMetric = countRulesFromMetric(utiliptables.TableNAT)
|
||||
if rulesTotalMetric != rulesTotal {
|
||||
t.Errorf("metric shows %d rules total but expected %d", rulesTotalMetric, rulesTotal)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user