mirror of
https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git
synced 2025-09-06 03:33:26 +00:00
replace contents of docs/proposals with stubs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,243 +1 @@
|
||||
# Kubelet TLS bootstrap
|
||||
|
||||
Author: George Tankersley (george.tankersley@coreos.com)
|
||||
|
||||
## Preface
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes a method for a kubelet to bootstrap itself
|
||||
into a TLS-secured cluster. Crucially, it automates the provision and
|
||||
distribution of signed certificates.
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
When a kubelet runs for the first time, it must be given TLS assets
|
||||
or generate them itself. In the first case, this is a burden on the cluster
|
||||
admin and a significant logistical barrier to secure Kubernetes rollouts. In
|
||||
the second, the kubelet must self-sign its certificate and forfeits many of the
|
||||
advantages of a PKI system. Instead, we propose that the kubelet generate a
|
||||
private key and a CSR for submission to a cluster-level certificate signing
|
||||
process.
|
||||
|
||||
## Preliminaries
|
||||
|
||||
We assume the existence of a functioning control plane. The
|
||||
apiserver should be configured for TLS initially or possess the ability to
|
||||
generate valid TLS credentials for itself. If secret information is passed in
|
||||
the request (e.g. auth tokens supplied with the request or included in
|
||||
ExtraInfo) then all communications from the node to the apiserver must take
|
||||
place over a verified TLS connection.
|
||||
|
||||
Each node is additionally provisioned with the following information:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Location of the apiserver
|
||||
2. Any CA certificates necessary to trust the apiserver's TLS certificate
|
||||
3. Access tokens (if needed) to communicate with the CSR endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
These should not change often and are thus simple to include in a static
|
||||
provisioning script.
|
||||
|
||||
## API Changes
|
||||
|
||||
### CertificateSigningRequest Object
|
||||
|
||||
We introduce a new API object to represent PKCS#10 certificate signing
|
||||
requests. It will be accessible under:
|
||||
|
||||
`/apis/certificates/v1beta1/certificatesigningrequests/mycsr`
|
||||
|
||||
It will have the following structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
// Describes a certificate signing request
|
||||
type CertificateSigningRequest struct {
|
||||
unversioned.TypeMeta `json:",inline"`
|
||||
api.ObjectMeta `json:"metadata,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// The certificate request itself and any additional information.
|
||||
Spec CertificateSigningRequestSpec `json:"spec,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// Derived information about the request.
|
||||
Status CertificateSigningRequestStatus `json:"status,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This information is immutable after the request is created.
|
||||
type CertificateSigningRequestSpec struct {
|
||||
// Base64-encoded PKCS#10 CSR data
|
||||
Request string `json:"request"`
|
||||
|
||||
// Any extra information the node wishes to send with the request.
|
||||
ExtraInfo []string `json:"extrainfo,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This information is derived from the request by Kubernetes and cannot be
|
||||
// modified by users. All information is optional since it might not be
|
||||
// available in the underlying request. This is intended to aid approval
|
||||
// decisions.
|
||||
type CertificateSigningRequestStatus struct {
|
||||
// Information about the requesting user (if relevant)
|
||||
// See user.Info interface for details
|
||||
Username string `json:"username,omitempty"`
|
||||
UID string `json:"uid,omitempty"`
|
||||
Groups []string `json:"groups,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// Fingerprint of the public key in request
|
||||
Fingerprint string `json:"fingerprint,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// Subject fields from the request
|
||||
Subject internal.Subject `json:"subject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// DNS SANs from the request
|
||||
Hostnames []string `json:"hostnames,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// IP SANs from the request
|
||||
IPAddresses []string `json:"ipaddresses,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
Conditions []CertificateSigningRequestCondition `json:"conditions,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type RequestConditionType string
|
||||
|
||||
// These are the possible states for a certificate request.
|
||||
const (
|
||||
Approved RequestConditionType = "Approved"
|
||||
Denied RequestConditionType = "Denied"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
type CertificateSigningRequestCondition struct {
|
||||
// request approval state, currently Approved or Denied.
|
||||
Type RequestConditionType `json:"type"`
|
||||
// brief reason for the request state
|
||||
Reason string `json:"reason,omitempty"`
|
||||
// human readable message with details about the request state
|
||||
Message string `json:"message,omitempty"`
|
||||
// If request was approved, the controller will place the issued certificate here.
|
||||
Certificate []byte `json:"certificate,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type CertificateSigningRequestList struct {
|
||||
unversioned.TypeMeta `json:",inline"`
|
||||
unversioned.ListMeta `json:"metadata,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
Items []CertificateSigningRequest `json:"items,omitempty"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
We also introduce CertificateSigningRequestList to allow listing all the CSRs in the cluster:
|
||||
|
||||
```go
|
||||
type CertificateSigningRequestList struct {
|
||||
api.TypeMeta
|
||||
api.ListMeta
|
||||
|
||||
Items []CertificateSigningRequest
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Certificate Request Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Node intialization
|
||||
|
||||
When the kubelet executes it checks a location on disk for TLS assets
|
||||
(currently `/var/run/kubernetes/kubelet.{key,crt}` by default). If it finds
|
||||
them, it proceeds. If there are no TLS assets, the kubelet generates a keypair
|
||||
and self-signed certificate. We propose the following optional behavior:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Generate a keypair
|
||||
2. Generate a CSR for that keypair with CN set to the hostname (or
|
||||
`--hostname-override` value) and DNS/IP SANs supplied with whatever values
|
||||
the host knows for itself.
|
||||
3. Post the CSR to the CSR API endpoint.
|
||||
4. Set a watch on the CSR object to be notified of approval or rejection.
|
||||
|
||||
### Controller response
|
||||
|
||||
The apiserver persists the CertificateSigningRequests and exposes the List of
|
||||
all CSRs for an administrator to approve or reject.
|
||||
|
||||
A new certificate controller watches for certificate requests. It must first
|
||||
validate the signature on each CSR and add `Condition=Denied` on
|
||||
any requests with invalid signatures (with Reason and Message incidicating
|
||||
such). For valid requests, the controller will derive the information in
|
||||
`CertificateSigningRequestStatus` and update that object. The controller should
|
||||
watch for updates to the approval condition of any CertificateSigningRequest.
|
||||
When a request is approved (signified by Conditions containing only Approved)
|
||||
the controller should generate and sign a certificate based on that CSR, then
|
||||
update the condition with the certificate data using the `/approval`
|
||||
subresource.
|
||||
|
||||
### Manual CSR approval
|
||||
|
||||
An administrator using `kubectl` or another API client can query the
|
||||
CertificateSigningRequestList and update the approval condition of
|
||||
CertificateSigningRequests. The default state is empty, indicating that there
|
||||
has been no decision so far. A state of "Approved" indicates that the admin has
|
||||
approved the request and the certificate controller should issue the
|
||||
certificate. A state of "Denied" indicates that admin has denied the
|
||||
request. An admin may also supply Reason and Message fields to explain the
|
||||
rejection.
|
||||
|
||||
## kube-apiserver support
|
||||
|
||||
The apiserver will present the new endpoints mentioned above and support the
|
||||
relevant object types.
|
||||
|
||||
## kube-controller-manager support
|
||||
|
||||
To handle certificate issuance, the controller-manager will need access to CA
|
||||
signing assets. This could be as simple as a private key and a config file or
|
||||
as complex as a PKCS#11 client and supplementary policy system. For now, we
|
||||
will add flags for a signing key, a certificate, and a basic policy file.
|
||||
|
||||
## kubectl support
|
||||
|
||||
To support manual CSR inspection and approval, we will add support for listing,
|
||||
inspecting, and approving or denying CertificateSigningRequests to kubectl. The
|
||||
interaction will be similar to
|
||||
[salt-key](https://docs.saltstack.com/en/latest/ref/cli/salt-key.html).
|
||||
|
||||
Specifically, the admin will have the ability to retrieve the full list of
|
||||
pending CSRs, inspect their contents, and set their approval conditions to one
|
||||
of:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Approved** if the controller should issue the cert
|
||||
2. **Denied** if the controller should not issue the cert
|
||||
|
||||
The suggested command for listing is `kubectl get csrs`. The approve/deny
|
||||
interactions can be accomplished with normal updates, but would be more
|
||||
conveniently accessed by direct subresource updates. We leave this for future
|
||||
updates to kubectl.
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### Endpoint Access Control
|
||||
|
||||
The ability to post CSRs to the signing endpoint should be controlled. As a
|
||||
simple solution we propose that each node be provisioned with an auth token
|
||||
(possibly static across the cluster) that is scoped via ABAC to only allow
|
||||
access to the CSR endpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
### Expiration & Revocation
|
||||
|
||||
The node is responsible for monitoring its own certificate expiration date.
|
||||
When the certificate is close to expiration, the kubelet should begin repeating
|
||||
this flow until it successfully obtains a new certificate. If the expiring
|
||||
certificate has not been revoked and the previous certificate request is still
|
||||
approved, then it may do so using the same keypair unless the cluster policy
|
||||
(see "Future Work") requires fresh keys.
|
||||
|
||||
Revocation is for the most part an unhandled problem in Go, requiring each
|
||||
application to produce its own logic around a variety of parsing functions. For
|
||||
now, our suggested best practice is to issue only short-lived certificates. In
|
||||
the future it may make sense to add CRL support to the apiserver's client cert
|
||||
auth.
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Work
|
||||
|
||||
- revocation UI in kubectl and CRL support at the apiserver
|
||||
- supplemental policy (e.g. cluster CA only issues 30-day certs for hostnames *.k8s.example.com, each new cert must have fresh keys, ...)
|
||||
- fully automated provisioning (using a handshake protocol or external list of authorized machines)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
|
||||
[]()
|
||||
<!-- END MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
|
||||
This file has moved to [https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/kubelet-tls-bootstrap.md](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/kubelet-tls-bootstrap.md)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user