github/kubernetes
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git synced 2025-07-27 05:27:21 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix ephemeral test description

Browse Source 
It looks like it tests two pods sharing the same volume, but the goal is
actually the opposite - two pods with the same inline volume definition
should get separate volumes.
This commit is contained in:
Jan Safranek 2021-11-03 14:26:04 +01:00
parent dba9975e3e
commit f0bc04f169
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
test/e2e/storage/testsuites/ephemeral.go
View File

@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ func (p *ephemeralTestSuite) DefineTests(driver storageframework.TestDriver, pat
l.testCase.TestEphemeral() l.testCase.TestEphemeral()
}) })
ginkgo.It("should support two pods which share the same volume", func() { ginkgo.It("should support two pods which have the same volume definition", func() {
init() init()
defer cleanup() defer cleanup()
@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ func (p *ephemeralTestSuite) DefineTests(driver storageframework.TestDriver, pat
// data written in one pod is really not // data written in one pod is really not
// visible in the other. // visible in the other.
if pattern.VolMode != v1.PersistentVolumeBlock && !readOnly && !shared { if pattern.VolMode != v1.PersistentVolumeBlock && !readOnly && !shared {
ginkgo.By("writing data in one pod and checking for it in the second") ginkgo.By("writing data in one pod and checking the second does not see it (it should get its own volume)")
e2evolume.VerifyExecInPodSucceed(f, pod, "touch /mnt/test-0/hello-world") e2evolume.VerifyExecInPodSucceed(f, pod, "touch /mnt/test-0/hello-world")
e2evolume.VerifyExecInPodSucceed(f, pod2, "[ ! -f /mnt/test-0/hello-world ]") e2evolume.VerifyExecInPodSucceed(f, pod2, "[ ! -f /mnt/test-0/hello-world ]")
} }