WaitForPodToDisappear was always called such that it listed all pods, which
made it less efficient than trying to get just the one pod it was checking for.
Being able to customize the poll interval in practice wasn't useful, therefore
it can be replaced with WaitForPodNotFoundInNamespace.
WaitForPodToDisappear was always called such that it listed all pods, which
made it less efficient than trying to get just the one pod it was checking for.
Being able to customize the poll interval in practice wasn't useful, therefore
it can be replaced with WaitForPodNotFoundInNamespace.
All code must use the context from Ginkgo when doing API calls or polling for a
change, otherwise the code would not return immediately when the test gets
aborted.
ginkgo.DeferCleanup has multiple advantages:
- The cleanup operation can get registered if and only if needed.
- No need to return a cleanup function that the caller must invoke.
- Automatically determines whether a context is needed, which will
simplify the introduction of context parameters.
- Ginkgo's timeline shows when it executes the cleanup operation.
Every ginkgo callback should return immediately when a timeout occurs or the
test run manually gets aborted with CTRL-C. To do that, they must take a ctx
parameter and pass it through to all code which might block.
This is a first automated step towards that: the additional parameter got added
with
sed -i 's/\(framework.ConformanceIt\|ginkgo.It\)\(.*\)func() {$/\1\2func(ctx context.Context) {/' \
$(git grep -l -e framework.ConformanceIt -e ginkgo.It )
$GOPATH/bin/goimports -w $(git status | grep modified: | sed -e 's/.* //')
log_test.go was left unchanged.
This removes WaitTimeoutForPodNoLongerRunningOrNotFoundInNamespace
introduced in f2b9479f8e and changes
the test to use goroutines to speed up the cleanups.
- update all the import statements
- run hack/pin-dependency.sh to change pinned dependency versions
- run hack/update-vendor.sh to update go.mod files and the vendor directory
- update the method signatures for custom reporters
Signed-off-by: Dave Chen <dave.chen@arm.com>
Ensure resources are created in zone with schedulable
nodes. For example, if we have 4 zones with 3 zones
having worker nodes and 1 zone having master nodes(unscheduable
for workloads), we should not create resources like PV, PVC or
pods in that zone.
We're running ubernetes tests
`should only be allowed to provision PDs in zones
where nodes exist`
on gcp&gke. While the test is useful in exercising
the scenario of identifying extra zone and
creating a node in it, not every Kube
distribution uses the same approach to create a node,
further if even there is an extra zone, we cannot
guarantee the zone to have enough quota. There can also
be other GCP specific edge cases all of which cannot be
covered within this test. So, removing the test
as agreed upon with the storage team
