Breakdown of the steps implemented as part of this e2e test is as follows:
1. Create a file `registration` at path `/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/`
2. Create sample device plugin with an environment variable with
`REGISTER_CONTROL_FILE=/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/registration` that
waits for a client to delete the control file.
3. Trigger plugin registeration by deleting the abovementioned directory.
4. Create a test pod requesting devices exposed by the device plugin.
5. Stop kubelet.
6. Remove pods using CRI to ensure new pods are created after kubelet restart.
7. Restart kubelet.
8. Wait for the sample device plugin pod to be running. In this case,
the registration is not triggered.
9. Ensure that resource capacity/allocatable exported by the device plugin is zero.
10. The test pod should fail with `UnexpectedAdmissionError`
11. Delete the test pod.
12. Delete the sample device plugin pod.
13. Remove `/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/` and its content, the directory
created to control registration
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
This commit reuses e2e tests implmented as part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110729.
The commit is borrowed from the aforementioned PR as is to preserve
authorship. Subsequent commit will update the end to end test to
simulate the problem this PR is trying to solve by reproducing
the issue: 109595.
Co-authored-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
In case of node reboot/kubelet restart, the flow of events involves
obtaining the state from the checkpoint file followed by setting
the `healthDevices`/`unhealthyDevices` to its zero value. This is
done to allow the device plugin to re-register itself so that
capacity can be updated appropriately.
During the allocation phase, we need to check if the resources requested
by the pod have been registered AND healthy devices are present on
the node to be allocated.
Also we need to move this check above `needed==0` where needed is
required - devices allocated to the container (which is obtained from
the checkpoint file) because even in cases where no additional devices
have to be allocated (as they were pre-allocated), we still need to
make the devices that were previously allocated are healthy.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Today, the health check response to the load balancers asking Kube-proxy for
the status of ETP:Local services does not include the healthz state of Kube-
proxy. This means that Kube-proxy might indicate to load balancers that they
should forward traffic to the node in question, simply because the endpoint
is running on the node - this overlooks the fact that Kube-proxy might be
not-healthy and hasn't successfully written the rules enabling traffic to
reach the endpoint.
- set higher severity and log level when unmanaged pods found and improve testing
- do not mention unsupported controller when triggering event for
unmanaged pods (this is covered by CalculateExpectedPodCountFailed
event)
- test unsupported controller
- make testing for events non blocking when event not found
Add node e2e test to verify that static pods can be started after a
previous static pod with the same config temporarily failed termination.
The scenario is:
1. Static pod is started
2. Static pod is deleted
3. Static pod termination fails (internally `syncTerminatedPod` fails)
4. At later time, pod termination should succeed
5. New static pod with the same config is (re)-added
6. New static pod is expected to start successfully
To repro this scenario, setup a pod using a NFS mount. The NFS server is
stopped which will result in volumes failing to unmount and
`syncTerminatedPod` to fail. The NFS server is later started, allowing
the volume to unmount successfully.
xref:
1. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/113145#issuecomment-1289587988
2. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/113065
3. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/113093
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
Add a node e2e to verify that if a static pod is terminated while the
container runtime or CRI returns an error, the pod is eventually
terminated successfully.
This test serves as a regression test for k8s.io/issue/113145 which
fixes an issue where force deleted pods may not be terminated if the
container runtime fails during a `syncTerminatingPod`.
To test this behavior, start a static pod, stop the container runtime,
and later start the container runtime. The static pod is expected to
eventually terminate successfully.
To start and stop the container runtime, we need to find the container
runtime systemd unit name. Introduce a util function
`findContainerRuntimeServiceName` which finds the unit name by getting
the pid of the container runtime from the existing
`ContainerRuntimeProcessName` flag passed into node e2e and using
systemd dbus `GetUnitNameByPID` function to convert the pid of the
container runtime to a unit name. Using the unit name, introduce helper
functions to start and stop the container runtime.
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
