Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66862, 67618). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use sync.map to scale equiv class cache better
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Change the current lock in first level ecache into `sync.Map`, which is known for scaling better than `sync. Mutex ` on machines with >8 CPUs
ref: https://golang.org/pkg/sync/#Map
And the code is much cleaner in this way.
5k Nodes, 10k Pods benchmark with ecache enabled in 64 cores VM:
```bash
// before
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/0Pods-64 10000 17550089 ns/op
// after
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/0Pods-64 10000 16975098 ns/op
```
Comparing to current implementation, the improvement after this change is noticeable, and the test is stable in 8, 16, 64 cores VM.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Use sync.map to scale ecache better
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67041, 66948). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Anti affinity optimization
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This pull request aims to optimize the performance of anti-affinity rules lookup of existing pods
This optimization maps the topology values to a list of pods running on nodes that match this value and store that map in the pod metadata. Accordingly, when validating anti-affinity rules of existing pods we will only check those running on nodes with similar topology values to the current candidate (node) for scheduling.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63937
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig scalability
/sig scheduling
**Release note**:
```release-note
improve performance of anti-affinity predicate of default scheduler.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
scheduler: add metrics to equivalence cache
This adds counters to equiv. cache reads & writes. Reads are labeled by
hit/miss, while writes are labeled to indicate whether the write was
discarded.
This will give us visibility into,
- hit rate of cache reads
- ratio of reads to writes
- rate of discarded writes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/63259
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67461, 67464, 67416). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Delete dead code in pkg/scheduler
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is just some cleanup. I found some unused code while evaluating the scheduler code.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/kind cleanup
/sig scheduling
This adds counters to equiv. cache reads & writes. Reads are labeled by
hit/miss, while writes are labeled to indicate whether the write was
discarded.
This will give us visibility into,
- hit rate of cache reads
- ratio of reads to writes
- rate of discarded writes
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66491, 66587, 66856, 66657, 66923). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add space for output
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65570, 65616). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Retry scheduling on StorageClass events
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56163
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I have taken over #60006.
It's hard to test in e2e, because we cannot know reschedule of pod is triggered by which event (periodically service/node events will move pods to active queue too). ~~I'll add integration tests for this functionality after [this PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65296) get merged.~~ (already added)
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63955, 66685, 66671). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove unused code in pkg/scheduler/algorithm/scheduler_interface_test.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
remove unused code in pkg/scheduler/algorithm/scheduler_interface_test.go
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66540, 66599). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Invalidate CheckVolumeBinding predicate only when VolumeScheduling feature is enabled
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Invalidate CheckVolumeBinding predicate only when VolumeScheduling feature is enabled.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66540, 66599). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
replace predicates string with corresponding const in TestDefaultPredicates
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
replace predicates string with corresponding const in TestDefaultPredicates. Unify with the const in func defaultPredicates().
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66291, 66471, 66499). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improve unit test TestZeroRequest
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66468
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Extender preemption should respect IsInterested()
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Extender preemption should respect IsInterested()
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66289
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The bug is reported and the first commit is co-authored by: @chenchun
**Release note**:
```release-note
Extender preemption should respect IsInterested()
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/core)
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Update scheduler's unit table tests to use subtest
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
breaks up PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63281
/ref #63267
**Release note**:
```release-note
This PR will leverage subtests on the existing table tests for the scheduler units.
Some refactoring of error/status messages and functions to align with new approach.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66410, 66398, 66061, 66397, 65558). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix volume limit for EBS on m5 and c5 instances
This is a fix for lower volume limits on m5 and c5 instance types while we wait for https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/554 to land GA.
This problem became urgent because many of our users are trying to migrate to those instance types in light of spectre/meltdown vulnerability but lower volume limit on those instance types often causes cluster instability. Yes they can workaround by configuring the scheduler with lower limit but often this becomes somewhat difficult to do when cluster is mixed.
The newer default limits were picked from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/volume_limits.html
Text about spectre/meltdown is available on - https://community.bitnami.com/t/spectre-variant-2/54961/5
/sig storage
/sig scheduling
```release-note
Fix volume limit for EBS on m5 and c5 instance types
```
