Additional test cases added:
Keeps device plugin assignments across pod and kubelet restarts (no device plugin re-registration)
Keeps device plugin assignments after the device plugin has re-registered (no kubelet or pod restart)
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Add a test suit to simulate node reboot (achieved by removing pods
using CRI API before kubelet is restarted).
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
This test captures that scenario where after kubelet restart,
application pod comes up and the device plugin pod hasn't re-registered
itself, the pod fails with admission error. It is worth noting that
once the device plugin pod has registered itself, another
application pod requesting devices ends up running
successfully.
For the test case where kubelet is restarted and device plugin
has re-registered without involving pod restart, since the
pod after kubelet restart ends up with admission error,
we cannot be certain the device that the second pod (pod2) would
get. As long as, it gets a device we consider the test to pass.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Breakdown of the steps implemented as part of this e2e test is as follows:
1. Create a file `registration` at path `/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/`
2. Create sample device plugin with an environment variable with
`REGISTER_CONTROL_FILE=/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/registration` that
waits for a client to delete the control file.
3. Trigger plugin registeration by deleting the abovementioned directory.
4. Create a test pod requesting devices exposed by the device plugin.
5. Stop kubelet.
6. Remove pods using CRI to ensure new pods are created after kubelet restart.
7. Restart kubelet.
8. Wait for the sample device plugin pod to be running. In this case,
the registration is not triggered.
9. Ensure that resource capacity/allocatable exported by the device plugin is zero.
10. The test pod should fail with `UnexpectedAdmissionError`
11. Delete the test pod.
12. Delete the sample device plugin pod.
13. Remove `/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/` and its content, the directory
created to control registration
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
This commit reuses e2e tests implmented as part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110729.
The commit is borrowed from the aforementioned PR as is to preserve
authorship. Subsequent commit will update the end to end test to
simulate the problem this PR is trying to solve by reproducing
the issue: 109595.
Co-authored-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Capture explicitly a test case pertaining to kubelet restart
but with no pod restart and device plugin re-registration.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Based on whether the test case requires pod restart or not, the sleep
interval needs to be updated and we define constants to represent the two
sleep intervals that can be used in the corresponding test cases.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Explicitly state that the test involves kubelet restart and device plugin
re-registration (no pod restart)
We remove the part of the code where we wait for the pod to restart as this
test case should no longer involve pod restart.
In addition to that, we use `waitForNodeReady` instead of `WaitForAllNodesSchedulable`
for ensuring that the node is ready for pods to be scheduled on it.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Rather than testing out for both pod restart and kubelet restart,
we change the tests to just handle pod restart scenario.
Clarify the test purpose and add extra check to tighten the test.
We would be adding additional tests to cover kubelet restart scenarios
in subsequent commits.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
With this change the error message are more helpful and easier
to troubleshoot in case of test failures.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
We rename to make the intent more explicit;
We make it global to be able to reuse the value all across the module
(e.g. to check the node readiness) later on.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Rather than only returning a string forcing us to log failure with
`framework.Fail`, we return a string and error to handle error cases
more conventionally. This enables us to use the `parseLog` function
inside `Eventually` and `Consistently` blocks, or in general to delegate
the error processing and enable better composability.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Add a regression test for https://issues.k8s.io/116925. The test
exercises the following:
1) Start a restart never pod which will exit with
`v1.PodSucceeded` phase.
2) Start a graceful deletion of the pod (set a deletion timestamp)
3) Restart the kubelet as soon as the kubelet reports the pod is
terminal (but before the pod is deleted).
4) Verify that after kubelet restart, the pod is deleted.
As of v1.27, there is a delay between the pod being marked terminal
phaes, and the status manager deleting the pod. If the kubelet is
restarted in the middle, after starting up again, the kubelet needs to
ensure the pod will be deleted on the API server.
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
* Slightly changed pod spec to repro issue #116262
* Refactor test to ensure that the static pod is deleted even if the
test fails
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
Implement DOS prevention wiring a global rate limit for podresources
API. The goal here is not to introduce a general ratelimiting solution
for the kubelet (we need more research and discussion to get there),
but rather to prevent misuse of the API.
Known limitations:
- the rate limits value (QPS, BurstTokens) are hardcoded to
"high enough" values.
Enabling user-configuration would require more discussion
and sweeping changes to the other kubelet endpoints, so it
is postponed for now.
- the rate limiting is global. Malicious clients can starve other
clients consuming the QPS quota.
Add e2e test to exercise the flow, because the wiring itself
is mostly boilerplate and API adaptation.
We have quite a few podresources e2e tests and, as the feature
progresses to GA, we should consider moving them to NodeConformance.
Unfortunately most of them require linux-specific features not in the
test themselves but in the test prelude (fixture) to check or create the
node conditions (e.g. presence or not of devices, online CPUS...) to be
verified in the test proper.
For this reason we promote only a single test for starters.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Since we can't rely on the test runner and hosts under test to
be on the same machine, we write to the terminate log from each
container and concatenate the results.
If a CRI error occurs during the terminating phase after a pod is
force deleted (API or static) then the housekeeping loop will not
deliver updates to the pod worker which prevents the pod's state
machine from progressing. The pod will remain in the terminating
phase but no further attempts to terminate or cleanup will occur
until the kubelet is restarted.
The pod worker now maintains a store of the pods state that it is
attempting to reconcile and uses that to resync unknown pods when
SyncKnownPods() is invoked, so that failures in sync methods for
unknown pods no longer hang forever.
The pod worker's store tracks desired updates and the last update
applied on podSyncStatuses. Each goroutine now synchronizes to
acquire the next work item, context, and whether the pod can start.
This synchronization moves the pending update to the stored last
update, which will ensure third parties accessing pod worker state
don't see updates before the pod worker begins synchronizing them.
As a consequence, the update channel becomes a simple notifier
(struct{}) so that SyncKnownPods can coordinate with the pod worker
to create a synthetic pending update for unknown pods (i.e. no one
besides the pod worker has data about those pods). Otherwise the
pending update info would be hidden inside the channel.
In order to properly track pending updates, we have to be very
careful not to mix RunningPods (which are calculated from the
container runtime and are missing all spec info) and config-
sourced pods. Update the pod worker to avoid using ToAPIPod()
and instead require the pod worker to directly use
update.Options.Pod or update.Options.RunningPod for the
correct methods. Add a new SyncTerminatingRuntimePod to prevent
accidental invocations of runtime only pod data.
Finally, fix SyncKnownPods to replay the last valid update for
undesired pods which drives the pod state machine towards
termination, and alter HandlePodCleanups to:
- terminate runtime pods that aren't known to the pod worker
- launch admitted pods that aren't known to the pod worker
Any started pods receive a replay until they reach the finished
state, and then are removed from the pod worker. When a desired
pod is detected as not being in the worker, the usual cause is
that the pod was deleted and recreated with the same UID (almost
always a static pod since API UID reuse is statistically
unlikely). This simplifies the previous restartable pod support.
We are careful to filter for active pods (those not already
terminal or those which have been previously rejected by
admission). We also force a refresh of the runtime cache to
ensure we don't see an older version of the state.
Future changes will allow other components that need to view the
pod worker's actual state (not the desired state the podManager
represents) to retrieve that info from the pod worker.
Several bugs in pod lifecycle have been undetectable at runtime
because the kubelet does not clearly describe the number of pods
in use. To better report, add the following metrics:
kubelet_desired_pods: Pods the pod manager sees
kubelet_active_pods: "Admitted" pods that gate new pods
kubelet_mirror_pods: Mirror pods the kubelet is tracking
kubelet_working_pods: Breakdown of pods from the last sync in
each phase, orphaned state, and static or not
kubelet_restarted_pods_total: A counter for pods that saw a
CREATE before the previous pod with the same UID was finished
kubelet_orphaned_runtime_pods_total: A counter for pods detected
at runtime that were not known to the kubelet. Will be
populated at Kubelet startup and should never be incremented
after.
Add a metric check to our e2e tests that verifies the values are
captured correctly during a serial test, and then verify them in
detail in unit tests.
Adds 23 series to the kubelet /metrics endpoint.
Add some additional init container tests that work via monitoring
container lifetime based on logs written to a common file. This allows
more easily writing assertions about the container lifetimes with
respect to one another.
Bump the timeout as the previous timeout was sometimes too short,
resulting in the pod status update not sent. Also, fixed a typo in
previous refactor.
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
