Automatic merge from submit-queue
Azure PD (Managed/Blob)
This is exactly the same code as this [PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41950). It has a clean set of generated items. We created a separate PR to accelerate the accept/merge the PR
CC @colemickens
CC @brendandburns
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. Adds K8S support for Azure Managed Disks.
2. Adds support for dedicated blob disks (1:1 to storage account) in addition to shared blob disks (n:1 to storage account).
3. Automatically manages the underlying storage accounts. New storage accounts are created at 50% utilization. Max is 100 disks, 60 disks per storage account.
2. Addresses the current issues with Blob Disks:
..* Significantly faster attach process. Disks are now usually available for pods on nodes under 30 sec if formatted, under a min if not formatted.
..* Adds support to move disks between nodes.
..* Adds consistent attach/detach behavior, checks if the disk is leased/attached on a different node before attempting to attach to target nodes.
..* Fixes a random hang behavior on Azure VMs during mount/format (for both blob + managed disks).
..* Fixes a potential conflict by avoiding the use of disk names for mount paths. The new plugin uses hashed disk uri for mount path.
The existing AzureDisk is used as is. Additional "kind" property was added allowing the user to decide if the pd will be shared, dedicated or managed (Azure Managed Disks are used).
Due to the change in mounting paths, existing PDs need to be recreated as PV or PVCs on the new plugin.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48864, 48651, 47703)
Enable logexporter mechanism to dump logs from k8s nodes to GCS directly
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48513
This adds support for logexporter from k8s side. Next I'll send a PR adding support from test-infra side.
/cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @kubernetes/test-infra-maintainers @fejta @wojtek-t @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add dockershim checkpoint node e2e test
Add a bunch of disruptive cases to test kubelet/dockershim's checkpoint work flow.
Some steps are quite hacky. Not sure if there is better ways to do things.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48555, 48849)
GCE: Fix panic when service loadbalancer has static IP address
Fixes#48848
```release-note
Fix service controller crash loop when Service with GCP LoadBalancer uses static IP (#48848, @nicksardo)
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48594, 47042, 48801, 48641, 48243)
Prepare to introduce websockets for exec and portforward
Refactor the code in remotecommand to better represent the structure of
what is common between portforward and exec.
Ref #48633
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[e2e-ingress] Get node tag from instance under GKE
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Making ingress CI green again.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#48167
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @nicksardo
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47918, 47964, 48151, 47881, 48299)
Add ApiEndpoint support to GCE config.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add the ability to change ApiEndpoint for GCE.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47850, 47835, 46197, 47250, 48284)
Do not fail on error when deleting ingress
Fixes#48239
If the api server or master is unavailable, the test should manually teardown load balancer resources.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47850, 47835, 46197, 47250, 48284)
Allocate clusterIP when change service type from ExternalName to ClusterIP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#35354#46190
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @smarterclayton @thockin
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48214, 48154)
Adding a retry and traceroute to the master version checking
This is hitting a lot of connection refused errors in the e2e upgrade tests. We should make this more robust in case this is intermittent network errors. In the event of an error, attempt to log a traceroute to the master.
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-bugs @dchen1107
#47379
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48139, 48042, 47645, 48054, 48003)
Pipe clusterID into gce_loadbalancer_external.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Small cleanup for GCE ELB codes.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#48002
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47915, 47856, 44086, 47575, 47475)
deprecate created-by annotation for e2e test framework
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR deprecates created-by annotation for e2e test framework. This is needed as we now have ControllerRef.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: xref #44407
**Special notes for your reviewer**: This is the third PR for deprecating created-by annotation. Other PRs can be found here: #47469, #47471
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47470, 47260, 47411, 46852, 46135)
Write reports for each upgrade test
Due to the way Ginkgo runs individual test cases and the level of coordination required for the upgrade tests, they were all run under a single Ginkgo test case. This PR generates and auxiliary report that break out the results of each upgrade test. This is accomplished by:
1) Wrapping `ginkgo.Fail` and `ginkgo.Skip` to get the actual failure or skip messages.
2) Recovering that info in the upgrade test to generate an auxiliary report.
I suggest reviewing commit by commit.
Sample report: https://storage.googleapis.com/krouseytestreports/logs/results/1/artifacts/junit_upgrades.xmlFixes: #47371
