This touches cases where FromInt() is used on numeric constants, or
values which are already int32s, or int variables which are defined
close by and can be changed to int32s with little impact.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
This change allows cloud providers to specify a custom retry period by
returning a RetryError. The purpose is to bypass the work queue-driven
exponential backoff algorithm when there is no need to back off.
Specifically, this can be the case when a cloud load balancer operation
such as a create or delete is still pending and the cloud API should be
polled for completion at a constant interval. A backoff algorithm would
not always be reasonable to apply here since there is no API or
performance degradation warranting an increasing wait time between API
requests.
Currently, openapiv3 discovery uses requestURI to discover resources.
However, that does not work when the rest endpoint contains prefixes
(e.g. `http://localhost/test-endpoint/`).
Because requestURI overwrites prefixes also in rest endpoint
(e.g. `http://localhost/openapiv3/apis/apps/v1`).
Since `absPath` keeps the prefixes in the rest endpoint,
this PR changes to absPath instead requestURI.
Additional test cases added:
Keeps device plugin assignments across pod and kubelet restarts (no device plugin re-registration)
Keeps device plugin assignments after the device plugin has re-registered (no kubelet or pod restart)
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Add a test suit to simulate node reboot (achieved by removing pods
using CRI API before kubelet is restarted).
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
This test captures that scenario where after kubelet restart,
application pod comes up and the device plugin pod hasn't re-registered
itself, the pod fails with admission error. It is worth noting that
once the device plugin pod has registered itself, another
application pod requesting devices ends up running
successfully.
For the test case where kubelet is restarted and device plugin
has re-registered without involving pod restart, since the
pod after kubelet restart ends up with admission error,
we cannot be certain the device that the second pod (pod2) would
get. As long as, it gets a device we consider the test to pass.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
Breakdown of the steps implemented as part of this e2e test is as follows:
1. Create a file `registration` at path `/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/`
2. Create sample device plugin with an environment variable with
`REGISTER_CONTROL_FILE=/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/registration` that
waits for a client to delete the control file.
3. Trigger plugin registeration by deleting the abovementioned directory.
4. Create a test pod requesting devices exposed by the device plugin.
5. Stop kubelet.
6. Remove pods using CRI to ensure new pods are created after kubelet restart.
7. Restart kubelet.
8. Wait for the sample device plugin pod to be running. In this case,
the registration is not triggered.
9. Ensure that resource capacity/allocatable exported by the device plugin is zero.
10. The test pod should fail with `UnexpectedAdmissionError`
11. Delete the test pod.
12. Delete the sample device plugin pod.
13. Remove `/var/lib/kubelet/device-plugins/sample/` and its content, the directory
created to control registration
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
This commit reuses e2e tests implmented as part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110729.
The commit is borrowed from the aforementioned PR as is to preserve
authorship. Subsequent commit will update the end to end test to
simulate the problem this PR is trying to solve by reproducing
the issue: 109595.
Co-authored-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
In case of node reboot/kubelet restart, the flow of events involves
obtaining the state from the checkpoint file followed by setting
the `healthDevices`/`unhealthyDevices` to its zero value. This is
done to allow the device plugin to re-register itself so that
capacity can be updated appropriately.
During the allocation phase, we need to check if the resources requested
by the pod have been registered AND healthy devices are present on
the node to be allocated.
Also we need to move this check above `needed==0` where needed is
required - devices allocated to the container (which is obtained from
the checkpoint file) because even in cases where no additional devices
have to be allocated (as they were pre-allocated), we still need to
make sure he devices that were previously allocated are healthy.
Signed-off-by: Swati Sehgal <swsehgal@redhat.com>
