github/kubernetes
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/kubernetes.git synced 2025-11-03 23:40:03 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
31,529 Commits 42 Branches 8,159 Tags
6c63460a2e5cb1e48fc5a56f0d0cec33e5d571f1
Commit Graph

306 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wojciech Tyczynski
3f288e365d Simplify registries initialization 2016-07-04 14:20:29 +02:00
David McMahon
ef0c9f0c5b Remove "All rights reserved" from all the headers. 2016-06-29 17:47:36 -07:00
Łukasz Oleś
038bb130b8 Include init containers in error messages 
fixes: #27040
 2016-06-13 12:20:20 +02:00
AdoHe
1cfcb24f37 exec support init container 2016-06-03 02:05:15 -04:00
Chao Xu
5a9e5be4c6 expose GET and PATCH for status subresource 2016-05-26 14:33:54 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt
29252acd1a Change rest storage Update interface to retrieve updated object 
Add OldObject to admission attributes

Update resthandler Patch/Update admission plumbing
 2016-05-23 21:09:26 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
132ebb091a Merge pull request #24459 from fgrzadkowski/unschedulable_pod 
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Add pod condition PodScheduled to detect situation when scheduler tried to schedule a Pod, but failed

Set `PodSchedule` condition to `ConditionFalse` in `scheduleOne()` if scheduling failed and to `ConditionTrue` in `/bind` subresource.

Ref #24404

@mml (as it seems to be related to "why pending" effort)

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/24459)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
 2016-05-12 05:54:06 -07:00
Filip Grzadkowski
a80b1798c4 Add pod condition PodScheduled to detect situation 
when scheduler tried to schedule a Pod, but failed.

Ref #24404
 2016-05-12 10:21:21 +02:00
k8s-merge-robot
28bc4b32c2 Merge pull request #24532 from rsc/master 
Automatic merge from submit-queue

apiserver latency reductions

Combined effect of these two commits on the latency observed by the 1000-node kubemark benchmark:

```
name                               old ms/op  new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                      127 ±16%    121 ± 9%   -4.58%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                      326 ±12%    266 ±12%  -18.48%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                      453 ±11%    400 ±14%  -11.79%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50    29.4 ±49%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.085 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90    83.0 ±78%   68.6 ±59%  -17.33%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99     216 ±43%    177 ±49%  -17.68%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                    24.5 ±14%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.562 n=30+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                    30.7 ± 1%   30.7 ± 1%   -0.30%  (p=0.011 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                    77.2 ±34%   54.2 ±23%  -29.76%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50     5.86 ±26%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.734 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.8 ± 7%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.06%  (p=0.010 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99     57.8 ±35%   39.5 ±55%  -31.60%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
PUT_nodes_p50                      14.9 ± 2%   14.8 ± 2%   -0.68%  (p=0.012 n=30+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                      16.5 ± 1%   16.3 ± 2%   -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                      57.9 ±47%   41.3 ±35%  -28.61%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50    6.35 ±29%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.944 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90    15.4 ± 5%   15.0 ± 5%   -2.18%  (p=0.001 n=29+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99    52.2 ±71%   32.9 ±46%  -36.99%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
POST_pods_p50                      8.99 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.903 n=30+29)
POST_pods_p90                      16.2 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%     ~     (p=0.287 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                      30.9 ±21%   26.4 ±12%  -14.73%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
POST_bindings_p50                  9.34 ±12%   8.92 ±15%   -4.54%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
POST_bindings_p90                  16.6 ± 1%   16.5 ± 3%   -0.73%  (p=0.017 n=28+29)
POST_bindings_p99                  23.5 ± 9%   21.1 ± 4%  -10.09%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_pods_p50                       10.8 ±11%   10.2 ± 5%   -5.47%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_pods_p90                       16.1 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%   -0.64%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                       23.4 ± 9%   20.9 ± 9%  -10.93%  (p=0.000 n=28+27)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50  2.42 ±16%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.054 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90  11.5 ±12%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.141 n=30+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99  19.5 ±21%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.397 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p50                      0.77 ±10%   0.76 ±10%     ~     (p=0.317 n=28+28)
GET_nodes_p90                      1.20 ±16%   1.14 ±24%   -4.66%  (p=0.036 n=28+29)
GET_nodes_p99                      11.4 ±48%    7.5 ±46%  -34.28%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p50     0.74 ±17%   0.73 ±17%     ~     (p=0.222 n=30+28)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90     1.04 ±25%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.231 n=30+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     12.1 ±81%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.063 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p50                       0.78 ±12%   0.77 ±10%     ~     (p=0.178 n=30+28)
GET_pods_p90                       1.06 ±19%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.120 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                       3.92 ±43%   2.45 ±38%  -37.55%  (p=0.000 n=27+25)
LIST_services_p50                  0.20 ±13%   0.20 ±16%     ~     (p=0.854 n=28+29)
LIST_services_p90                  0.28 ±15%   0.27 ±14%     ~     (p=0.219 n=29+28)
LIST_services_p99                  0.49 ±20%   0.47 ±24%     ~     (p=0.140 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p50                 0.19 ±14%   0.19 ±15%     ~     (p=0.709 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p90                 0.26 ±16%   0.26 ±13%     ~     (p=0.274 n=29+28)
LIST_endpoints_p99                 0.46 ±24%   0.44 ±21%     ~     (p=0.111 n=29+29)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p50  0.16 ±15%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.253 n=30+27)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p90  0.22 ±24%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.152 n=30+28)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p99  0.31 ±33%   0.31 ±38%     ~     (p=0.817 n=28+29)
LIST_daemonsets_p50                0.16 ±20%   0.15 ±11%     ~     (p=0.135 n=30+27)
LIST_daemonsets_p90                0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±25%     ~     (p=0.135 n=29+28)
LIST_daemonsets_p99                0.29 ±28%   0.29 ±32%     ~     (p=0.606 n=28+28)
LIST_jobs_p50                      0.16 ±16%   0.15 ±12%     ~     (p=0.375 n=29+28)
LIST_jobs_p90                      0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.090 n=29+26)
LIST_jobs_p99                      0.31 ±28%   0.28 ±35%  -10.29%  (p=0.005 n=29+27)
LIST_deployments_p50               0.15 ±16%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.565 n=29+28)
LIST_deployments_p90               0.22 ±22%   0.21 ±19%     ~     (p=0.107 n=30+28)
LIST_deployments_p99               0.31 ±27%   0.29 ±34%     ~     (p=0.068 n=29+28)
LIST_namespaces_p50                0.21 ±25%   0.21 ±26%     ~     (p=0.768 n=29+27)
LIST_namespaces_p90                0.28 ±29%   0.26 ±25%     ~     (p=0.101 n=30+28)
LIST_namespaces_p99                0.30 ±48%   0.29 ±42%     ~     (p=0.339 n=30+29)
LIST_replicasets_p50               0.15 ±18%   0.15 ±16%     ~     (p=0.612 n=30+28)
LIST_replicasets_p90               0.22 ±19%   0.21 ±18%   -5.13%  (p=0.011 n=28+27)
LIST_replicasets_p99               0.31 ±39%   0.28 ±29%     ~     (p=0.066 n=29+28)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p50         0.16 ±23%   0.15 ±21%     ~     (p=0.124 n=30+29)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p90         0.21 ±23%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.092 n=30+25)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p99         0.21 ±24%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.053 n=30+25)
LIST_resourcequotas_p50            0.16 ±12%   0.16 ±13%     ~     (p=0.175 n=27+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p90            0.20 ±22%   0.20 ±24%     ~     (p=0.388 n=30+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p99            0.22 ±24%   0.22 ±23%     ~     (p=0.575 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p50    0.15 ±21%   0.15 ±29%     ~     (p=0.079 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p90    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p99    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_pods_p50                      68.0 ±16%   56.3 ± 9%  -17.19%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                       119 ±19%     93 ± 8%  -21.88%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p99                       230 ±18%    202 ±14%  -12.13%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
```
 2016-04-27 08:32:18 -07:00
Timothy St. Clair
24b4286960 In preparation for new storage backends renaming generic registry store 2016-04-26 08:32:13 -05:00
Russ Cox
58629a28e4 pkg/registry/pod: avoid allocation in common pod search 
PodToSelectableFields creates a map of field attributes
for a particular pod filter query to use. If the result
of the query does not depend on the fields at all, avoid
creating the map.

This is the source of about half the allocated memory
(by byte volume) during the kubemark benchmark, and it
is in turn the main driver of CPU usage during the benchmark,
because of the many background pod watches going on,
as well as the occasional list pods.

These benchmarks for 1000-node kubemark show the difference
from my previous CL (caching timers) to this CL:

name                               old ms/op   new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                       124 ±13%    121 ± 9%     ~     (p=0.136 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                       278 ±15%    266 ±12%   -4.26%  (p=0.031 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                       405 ±19%    400 ±14%     ~     (p=0.864 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p50                       65.3 ±13%   56.3 ± 9%  -13.75%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                        115 ±12%     93 ± 8%  -18.75%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
LIST_pods_p99                        226 ±21%    202 ±14%  -10.52%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50     26.6 ±43%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.487 n=29+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90     68.7 ±63%   68.6 ±59%     ~     (p=0.931 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99      173 ±41%    177 ±49%     ~     (p=0.618 n=28+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50      5.83 ±36%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.818 n=28+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90      15.9 ± 6%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.23%  (p=0.019 n=28+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99      56.7 ±41%   39.5 ±55%  -30.29%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                     24.3 ±17%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.855 n=28+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                     30.6 ± 0%   30.7 ± 1%     ~     (p=0.140 n=28+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                     56.3 ±27%   54.2 ±23%     ~     (p=0.188 n=28+27)
PUT_nodes_p50                       14.9 ± 1%   14.8 ± 2%     ~     (p=0.781 n=28+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                       16.4 ± 2%   16.3 ± 2%     ~     (p=0.321 n=28+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                       44.6 ±42%   41.3 ±35%     ~     (p=0.361 n=29+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50     6.33 ±23%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.993 n=28+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.2 ± 6%   15.0 ± 5%     ~     (p=0.106 n=28+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99     53.4 ±52%   32.9 ±46%  -38.41%  (p=0.000 n=27+27)
POST_pods_p50                       9.33 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.069 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p90                       16.3 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%   -1.43%  (p=0.044 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                       28.4 ±23%   26.4 ±12%   -7.05%  (p=0.004 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50   2.50 ±13%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.649 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90   11.7 ±10%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.863 n=28+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99   19.0 ±22%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.818 n=28+29)
PUT_pods_p50                        10.3 ± 5%   10.2 ± 5%     ~     (p=0.235 n=28+27)
PUT_pods_p90                        16.0 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%     ~     (p=0.380 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                        21.6 ±14%   20.9 ± 9%   -3.15%  (p=0.010 n=28+27)
POST_bindings_p50                   8.98 ±17%   8.92 ±15%     ~     (p=0.666 n=29+28)
POST_bindings_p90                   16.5 ± 2%   16.5 ± 3%     ~     (p=0.840 n=26+29)
POST_bindings_p99                   21.4 ± 5%   21.1 ± 4%   -1.21%  (p=0.049 n=27+28)
GET_nodes_p90                       1.18 ±19%   1.14 ±24%     ~     (p=0.137 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p99                       8.29 ±40%   7.50 ±46%     ~     (p=0.106 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90      1.03 ±21%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.489 n=29+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     10.0 ±123%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.794 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p90                        1.08 ±21%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.083 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                        2.81 ±39%   2.45 ±38%  -12.78%  (p=0.021 n=28+25)

Overall the two CLs combined have this effect:

name                               old ms/op  new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                      127 ±16%    121 ± 9%   -4.58%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                      326 ±12%    266 ±12%  -18.48%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                      453 ±11%    400 ±14%  -11.79%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50    29.4 ±49%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.085 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90    83.0 ±78%   68.6 ±59%  -17.33%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99     216 ±43%    177 ±49%  -17.68%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                    24.5 ±14%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.562 n=30+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                    30.7 ± 1%   30.7 ± 1%   -0.30%  (p=0.011 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                    77.2 ±34%   54.2 ±23%  -29.76%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50     5.86 ±26%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.734 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.8 ± 7%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.06%  (p=0.010 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99     57.8 ±35%   39.5 ±55%  -31.60%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
PUT_nodes_p50                      14.9 ± 2%   14.8 ± 2%   -0.68%  (p=0.012 n=30+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                      16.5 ± 1%   16.3 ± 2%   -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                      57.9 ±47%   41.3 ±35%  -28.61%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50    6.35 ±29%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.944 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90    15.4 ± 5%   15.0 ± 5%   -2.18%  (p=0.001 n=29+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99    52.2 ±71%   32.9 ±46%  -36.99%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
POST_pods_p50                      8.99 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.903 n=30+29)
POST_pods_p90                      16.2 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%     ~     (p=0.287 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                      30.9 ±21%   26.4 ±12%  -14.73%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
POST_bindings_p50                  9.34 ±12%   8.92 ±15%   -4.54%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
POST_bindings_p90                  16.6 ± 1%   16.5 ± 3%   -0.73%  (p=0.017 n=28+29)
POST_bindings_p99                  23.5 ± 9%   21.1 ± 4%  -10.09%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_pods_p50                       10.8 ±11%   10.2 ± 5%   -5.47%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_pods_p90                       16.1 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%   -0.64%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                       23.4 ± 9%   20.9 ± 9%  -10.93%  (p=0.000 n=28+27)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50  2.42 ±16%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.054 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90  11.5 ±12%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.141 n=30+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99  19.5 ±21%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.397 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p50                      0.77 ±10%   0.76 ±10%     ~     (p=0.317 n=28+28)
GET_nodes_p90                      1.20 ±16%   1.14 ±24%   -4.66%  (p=0.036 n=28+29)
GET_nodes_p99                      11.4 ±48%    7.5 ±46%  -34.28%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p50     0.74 ±17%   0.73 ±17%     ~     (p=0.222 n=30+28)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90     1.04 ±25%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.231 n=30+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     12.1 ±81%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.063 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p50                       0.78 ±12%   0.77 ±10%     ~     (p=0.178 n=30+28)
GET_pods_p90                       1.06 ±19%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.120 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                       3.92 ±43%   2.45 ±38%  -37.55%  (p=0.000 n=27+25)
LIST_services_p50                  0.20 ±13%   0.20 ±16%     ~     (p=0.854 n=28+29)
LIST_services_p90                  0.28 ±15%   0.27 ±14%     ~     (p=0.219 n=29+28)
LIST_services_p99                  0.49 ±20%   0.47 ±24%     ~     (p=0.140 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p50                 0.19 ±14%   0.19 ±15%     ~     (p=0.709 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p90                 0.26 ±16%   0.26 ±13%     ~     (p=0.274 n=29+28)
LIST_endpoints_p99                 0.46 ±24%   0.44 ±21%     ~     (p=0.111 n=29+29)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p50  0.16 ±15%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.253 n=30+27)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p90  0.22 ±24%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.152 n=30+28)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p99  0.31 ±33%   0.31 ±38%     ~     (p=0.817 n=28+29)
LIST_daemonsets_p50                0.16 ±20%   0.15 ±11%     ~     (p=0.135 n=30+27)
LIST_daemonsets_p90                0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±25%     ~     (p=0.135 n=29+28)
LIST_daemonsets_p99                0.29 ±28%   0.29 ±32%     ~     (p=0.606 n=28+28)
LIST_jobs_p50                      0.16 ±16%   0.15 ±12%     ~     (p=0.375 n=29+28)
LIST_jobs_p90                      0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.090 n=29+26)
LIST_jobs_p99                      0.31 ±28%   0.28 ±35%  -10.29%  (p=0.005 n=29+27)
LIST_deployments_p50               0.15 ±16%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.565 n=29+28)
LIST_deployments_p90               0.22 ±22%   0.21 ±19%     ~     (p=0.107 n=30+28)
LIST_deployments_p99               0.31 ±27%   0.29 ±34%     ~     (p=0.068 n=29+28)
LIST_namespaces_p50                0.21 ±25%   0.21 ±26%     ~     (p=0.768 n=29+27)
LIST_namespaces_p90                0.28 ±29%   0.26 ±25%     ~     (p=0.101 n=30+28)
LIST_namespaces_p99                0.30 ±48%   0.29 ±42%     ~     (p=0.339 n=30+29)
LIST_replicasets_p50               0.15 ±18%   0.15 ±16%     ~     (p=0.612 n=30+28)
LIST_replicasets_p90               0.22 ±19%   0.21 ±18%   -5.13%  (p=0.011 n=28+27)
LIST_replicasets_p99               0.31 ±39%   0.28 ±29%     ~     (p=0.066 n=29+28)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p50         0.16 ±23%   0.15 ±21%     ~     (p=0.124 n=30+29)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p90         0.21 ±23%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.092 n=30+25)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p99         0.21 ±24%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.053 n=30+25)
LIST_resourcequotas_p50            0.16 ±12%   0.16 ±13%     ~     (p=0.175 n=27+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p90            0.20 ±22%   0.20 ±24%     ~     (p=0.388 n=30+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p99            0.22 ±24%   0.22 ±23%     ~     (p=0.575 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p50    0.15 ±21%   0.15 ±29%     ~     (p=0.079 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p90    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p99    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_pods_p50                      68.0 ±16%   56.3 ± 9%  -17.19%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                       119 ±19%     93 ± 8%  -21.88%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p99                       230 ±18%    202 ±14%  -12.13%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
 2016-04-21 15:53:47 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
95e09e303f Merge pull request #22965 from caesarxuchao/delete-UID-precondition 
Auto commit by PR queue bot
 2016-03-26 09:36:28 -07:00
goltermann
32d569d6c7 Fixing all the "composite literal uses unkeyed fields" Vet errors. 2016-03-25 15:25:09 -07:00
Chao Xu
31b425b3a1 add delete precondition 2016-03-25 11:21:39 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
2777cd7e75 Merge pull request #23295 from hongchaodeng/error 
Auto commit by PR queue bot
 2016-03-23 02:27:36 -07:00
Hongchao Deng
189ce6e397 storage: add custom storage error 2016-03-22 08:19:16 -07:00
harry
b0900bf0d4 Refactor diff into sub pkg 2016-03-21 20:21:39 +08:00
Timothy St. Clair
d3da93c174 Renaming api/errors/etcd to api/errors/storage as it no longer 
has any etcd specific dependencies.  Reference issue #17546
 2016-03-15 20:23:47 -05:00
Chao Xu
ff446ece57 adding a test to make sure the ignore NotFound error patch is working 2016-03-05 22:32:58 -08:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
506899008f Parallelization of namespace deletion 2016-02-25 16:33:25 +01:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
4eadc5e97b Introduce RESTOptions to configure per-resource storage 2016-02-22 16:28:28 +01:00
derekwaynecarr
76f2cc6a11 Add field selector for pod.spec.restartPolicy 2016-02-16 16:51:42 -05:00
k8s-merge-robot
e5009bfdcd Merge pull request #19474 from endocode/container_names_in_kubectl_logs 
Auto commit by PR queue bot
 2016-02-08 14:22:22 -08:00
magicwang-cn
d2cf858560 make watch cache sizes configuratable of kube-apiserver 2016-02-05 15:47:27 +08:00
Chao Xu
ebcff4b5e4 fix the namespaceScoped of cachers 2016-01-28 16:24:54 -08:00
Julian Strobl
6cd10d4f87 add container names kubectl logs output 
Present a list of container names one can choose from.
 2016-01-25 13:35:47 +01:00
Alex Mohr
1ab41d5238 Merge pull request #16509 from miminar/namespace_field_conv 
Add missing field label conversions for Namespace
 2016-01-21 10:27:02 -08:00
Harry Zhang
936a11e775 Use networking to hold network related pkgs 
Change names of unclear methods

Use net as pkg name for short
 2016-01-15 13:46:16 +08:00
Michal Minar
3188e123a9 Add missing field label conversions 
Added missing field labels conversion functions for kinds:
- ConfigMap
- DaemonSet
- Deployment
- Endpoints
- Event
- Ingress
- Job
- PersistentVolume
- PersistentVolumeClaim
- ResourceQuota
- Secret
- Service

Completed conversion functions of few other kinds:
- Namespace
- ServiceAccount

Added tests suite for the above.

Signed-off-by: Michal Minar <miminar@redhat.com>
 2016-01-14 10:00:45 +01:00
deads2k
9fda7f1812 update StatusDetails to handle Groups 2015-12-17 09:14:12 -05:00
mqliang
04763abbbb remove TODO:binding validation 2015-12-15 14:47:55 +08:00
Tim Hockin
872faffdac Internal errors are internal 2015-12-10 11:48:19 -08:00
Tim Hockin
7fb8f60735 Shorten names for better reading 2015-12-10 11:48:19 -08:00
Tim Hockin
87a35047dd Move FieldPath and errors to a sub-package 
This makes the naming and reading a lot simpler.
 2015-12-10 11:48:16 -08:00
Tim Hockin
e6df0b1a24 Convert validation to use FieldPath 
Before this change we have a mish-mash of ways to pass field names around for
error generation.  Sometimes string fieldnames, sometimes .Prefix(), sometimes
neither, often wrong names or not indexed when it should be.

Instead of that mess, this is part one of a couple of commits that will make it
more strongly typed and hopefully encourage correct behavior.  At least you
will have to think about field names, which is better than nothing.

It turned out to be really hard to do this incrementally.
 2015-12-03 08:19:44 -08:00
gmarek
459131fd92 Use KubeletPort reported in NodeStatus instead of cluster-wide master config, take 2. 2015-12-02 13:38:17 +01:00
Fabiano Franz
afd56495a1 Pod log location must validate container if provided 2015-11-29 23:20:01 -02:00
Tim Hockin
ceee678b29 Rename validation 'New' funcs 2015-11-23 10:01:43 -08:00
Tim Hockin
48b49a5cae s/ValidationErrorList/ErrorList/ 2015-11-22 20:13:20 -08:00
Tim Hockin
0ff66da346 Move fielderrors into validation 2015-11-22 20:12:20 -08:00
Timothy St. Clair
02851dd1b7 Removal of fakeClient and shift to storage.Interface for 
all registry tests.
 2015-11-19 10:34:30 -06:00
k8s-merge-robot
961a02a602 Merge pull request #17204 from thockin/airplane-rest-canonicalize 
Auto commit by PR queue bot
 2015-11-13 18:17:18 -08:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
a5a8717539 Pass versioner to cacher. 2015-11-13 08:35:28 +01:00
Tim Hockin
35ab5c6234 Add a REST hook for post-validation canonicalize 
This is a simple hook that only Endpoints uses for now.
 2015-11-12 21:13:16 -08:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
3df5d1dbc3 Move storage-related dirs under pkg/storage. 2015-11-12 19:49:32 +01:00
k8s-merge-robot
5156b93a35 Merge pull request #16576 from hurf/mv_minions 
Auto commit by PR queue bot
 2015-11-05 17:15:17 -08:00
feihujiang
c39faf19f3 Move rest handler of subresources of pod to rest package 2015-11-04 10:23:49 +08:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
8f385c563f Refactor code for creating Cacher. 2015-11-02 20:56:46 +01:00
feihujiang
726def04d5 Make rootscoped resource no namespace selectable field 2015-10-31 10:52:21 +08:00
hurf
3d7dd82bf6 Clean trace of "Minion" 
Trivial change, remove "minion" in message.
 2015-10-30 14:35:08 +08:00