Automatic merge from submit-queue
Node E2E: Move host info around test result.
Discussed offline with @yujuhong and @dchen1107. Currently, the node e2e result is organized as:
```
================================================================
Success Finished Host tmp-node-e2e-b6c375c7-e2e-node-containervm-v20160321-image Test Suite
{ginkgo-output}
{framework-error}
================================================================
```
This makes it painful to find which image the test is failing on. The `{ginkgo-output}` is usually quite long, so we have to scroll mouse up and down to find the host name.
This PR changes the test result to:
```
================================================================
Start Host tmp-node-e2e-b6c375c7-e2e-node-containervm-v20160321-image Test Suite
{ginkgo-output}
Success Finished Host tmp-node-e2e-b6c375c7-e2e-node-containervm-v20160321-image Test Suite
{framework-error}
================================================================
```
This is not perfect, but much better than before. We can easily find the host name under the ginkgo test result, like this:
```
================================================================
Start Host test-gci-dev-54-8743-3-0 Test Suite
Running Suite: E2eNode Suite
============================
Random Seed: 1472511489 - Will randomize all specs
Will run 0 of 131 specs
Running in parallel across 8 nodes
I0829 22:58:13.727764 1143 e2e_node_suite_test.go:98] Pre-pulling images so that they are cached for the tests.
I0829 22:58:28.562459 1143 e2e_node_suite_test.go:111] Node services started. Running tests...
I0829 22:58:28.562477 1143 e2e_node_suite_test.go:116] Wait for the node to be ready
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
------------------------------
I0829 22:58:29.742596 1143 e2e_node_suite_test.go:136] Stopping node services...
I0829 22:58:29.742650 1143 services.go:673] Killing process 1423 (services) with -TERM
I0829 22:58:29.860893 1143 e2e_node_suite_test.go:141] Tests Finished
Ran 0 of 131 Specs in 16.185 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 0 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 131 Skipped
Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 19.939034297s
Test Suite Passed
Success Finished Host test-gci-dev-54-8743-3-0 Test Suite
================================================================
```
In a following PR, I'll print the test result from different images into different files to make it more clear for debugging. Mark v1.4 because this helps us de-flake test.
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Explicitly delete pods in node performance tests
This PR explicitly deletes all created pods at the end in node e2e performance related tests.
The large number of pods may cause namespace cleanup times out (in #30878), therefore we explicitly delete all pods for cleaning up.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rewrite disruption e2e test to use versioned client.
This currently includes the changes from #31638. I will rebase once that is merged.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
increase latency and resource limit accroding to test results
This PR increases the latency limit of node e2e density test according to previous test results.
Fixed#30878
Automatic merge from submit-queue
e2e: log wget output on CheckConnectivityToHost error
Log output might help to diagnose e2e flakes, whether they are caused by dns issues or connection timeouts.
Might help with flake https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/28188.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix make test-integration under OSX
Just throw in a doc.go so there's something compilable in the
test/integration/metrics directory.
Fixes#31587
Automatic merge from submit-queue
test/node-e2e: Update CoreOS update disabling
Previously in this saga... #25004
This disables update-engine and locksmithd with ignition instead of
cloud-init so that they're really totally 100% disabled. Our ignition guy promises.
Pretty much every way of disabling them with cloud-init is mildly racy.
Fixes#31633
I think @vishh can say "I told you so" after the comment on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/30023#discussion-diff-73431324 .. he was right, but it turns out "stop" there doesn't really work either because of the mess that is cloud-init. Fortunately, converting our cloud-init to json and calling it "ignition" works quite well 😄
Testing done: I ssh'd in and verified that yes, they're disabled. I didn't wait on the e2e tests to pass, so we'll let this PR check that.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add e2e tests for Federated Ingress
This is e2e code for federation ingress controller.
Based util functions, add federation ingress e2e cases(reuse current k8s ones) and add logic to validate the result.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
E2E tests for the Source IP Preservation for LoadBalancers
Breaking out E2E changes from the main PR - these tests require the Alpha feature gate turned on for this feature otherwise they will consistently fail.
This disables update-engine and locksmithd with ignition instead of
cloud-init so that they're really totally 100% disabled.
Pretty much every way of disabling them with cloud-init is mildly racy.
Fixes#31633
Add a loop to retry the request to account for the TLS Timeout and API
credential error responses outlined by the flakes in #29227.
Fixes#29227
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <me@jessfraz.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add retries for add/update/remove taints on node in taints e2e
fixes taint update conflict in taints e2e by adding retries for add/update/remove taints on node.
ref #27655 and #31066
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Get network name via e2e environment.
This should work, right? I plan to pipe it through into the TestContext soon, just not today, and I'd like some test runtime over the weekend. Open to suggestions.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[AppArmor] Promote AppArmor annotations to beta
Justification for promoting AppArmor to beta:
1. We will provide an upgrade path to GA
2. We don't anticipate any major changes to the design, and will continue to invest in this feature
3. We will thoroughly test it. If any serious issues are uncovered we can reevaluate, and we're committed to fixing them.
4. We plan to provide beta-level support for the feature anyway (responding quickly to issues).
Note that this does not include the yet-to-be-merged status annotation (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/31382). I'd like to propose keeping that one alpha for now because I'm not sure the PodStatus is the right long-term home for it (I think a separate monitoring channel, e.g. cAdvisor, would be a better solution).
/cc @thockin @matchstick @erictune
