Commit Graph

28303 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gmarek
3171aac57c Generated clients can return their RESTClients, RESTClient can return its RateLimiter 2016-04-27 22:15:10 +02:00
CJ Cullen
3253739505 Use ABAC authz instead of AllowAll. 2016-04-27 11:38:15 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
4c7abddc1c Merge pull request #24567 from yifan-gu/post_start_hook
Automatic merge from submit-queue

rkt: Add post-start hook support.

This adds a poll-and-timeout procedure after the pod is
started, to make sure the post-start hooks execute when the
container is actually running.

This is a temporal workaround for implementing post-hooks,
a long term solution is to use lifecycle event to trigger
those hooks, see https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/23084.

Also this fixes a bug of getting container ID for a non-running
container when running pre-stop hook.


cc @sjpotter @euank @kubernetes/sig-node
2016-04-27 11:14:35 -07:00
Cesar Wong
55114efcb7 Port-forward: use out and error streams instead of glog 2016-04-27 13:26:54 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
4d5f6872bb Merge pull request #24609 from andyzheng0831/debug
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Trusty: Add debug supports for docker and kubelet

This PR adds debug support in two aspects: (1) For a test cluster, docker command will have "--debug" flag. Recently we noticed that this is very helpful in debug e2e test failures; (2) The kubelet command line will be put in /etc/default/kubelet. If a developer wants to test kubelet flags without recreating a cluster, she/he only needs to revise this file and then run "initctl restart kubelet". In addition, this PR fixes a couple of small things like comments and alignment.

Test result:
(1) Manually verified changing /etc/default/kubelet and run "initctl restart kubelet";
(2) Verified docker command line flag "--debug";
(3) e2e on pure trusty cluster and hybrid cluster all passed.

@roberthbailey @dchen1107 @zmerlynn please review it.

cc/ @yujuhong @fabioy @wonderfly FYI.
2016-04-27 10:26:01 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
3a19ad7908 Merge pull request #24559 from derekwaynecarr/eviction_flags
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Add kubelet flags for eviction threshold configuration

This PR just adds the flags for kubelet eviction and the associated generated code.

I am happy to tweak text, but we can also do that later at this point in the release.

Since this causes codegen, I wanted to stage this first.

/cc @vishh @kubernetes/sig-node
2016-04-27 10:25:48 -07:00
jianhuiz
fdfe42ea44 move install of version handler to genericapiserver 2016-04-27 10:21:08 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
7e430f543b Merge pull request #24545 from swagiaal/rename-cleaner-tuple
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Rename cleanerTuple to cleaner

Rename cleanerTuple to cleaner.
This is a follow up to address: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/19503#discussion_r49538769

@saad-ali
2016-04-27 09:51:26 -07:00
Zach Loafman
d1dadf70f4 Jenkins: Clean up even if we can't bring cluster up
We're gathering all the cluster logs, go ahead and clean up the
resources.
2016-04-27 09:44:14 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
759f11bd4c Merge pull request #24541 from marun/net-e2e-remove-flaky
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Remove flaky tag from e2e net granular

The tests are running reliably on every origin merge and can be verified
similarly reliable on kube.

As per @jayunit100 on slack/sig-testing:

    ./cluster/kubectl.sh 2>&1 | grep Passed | grep Failed ; done
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
    SUCCESS! -- 2 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 275 Skipped PASS
2016-04-27 09:11:36 -07:00
Maciej Szulik
5761b4a8bd Fix SELinux settings for mounted volumes 2016-04-27 17:45:04 +02:00
k8s-merge-robot
9db40b6b8d Merge pull request #24345 from gmarek/enable_gatherer
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Enable resource gatherer in Kubemark tests

Depends on #24291

Ref. #23820

cc @jlowdermilk
2016-04-27 08:32:20 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
28bc4b32c2 Merge pull request #24532 from rsc/master
Automatic merge from submit-queue

apiserver latency reductions

Combined effect of these two commits on the latency observed by the 1000-node kubemark benchmark:

```
name                               old ms/op  new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                      127 ±16%    121 ± 9%   -4.58%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                      326 ±12%    266 ±12%  -18.48%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                      453 ±11%    400 ±14%  -11.79%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50    29.4 ±49%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.085 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90    83.0 ±78%   68.6 ±59%  -17.33%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99     216 ±43%    177 ±49%  -17.68%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                    24.5 ±14%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.562 n=30+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                    30.7 ± 1%   30.7 ± 1%   -0.30%  (p=0.011 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                    77.2 ±34%   54.2 ±23%  -29.76%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50     5.86 ±26%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.734 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.8 ± 7%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.06%  (p=0.010 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99     57.8 ±35%   39.5 ±55%  -31.60%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
PUT_nodes_p50                      14.9 ± 2%   14.8 ± 2%   -0.68%  (p=0.012 n=30+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                      16.5 ± 1%   16.3 ± 2%   -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                      57.9 ±47%   41.3 ±35%  -28.61%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50    6.35 ±29%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.944 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90    15.4 ± 5%   15.0 ± 5%   -2.18%  (p=0.001 n=29+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99    52.2 ±71%   32.9 ±46%  -36.99%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
POST_pods_p50                      8.99 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.903 n=30+29)
POST_pods_p90                      16.2 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%     ~     (p=0.287 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                      30.9 ±21%   26.4 ±12%  -14.73%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
POST_bindings_p50                  9.34 ±12%   8.92 ±15%   -4.54%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
POST_bindings_p90                  16.6 ± 1%   16.5 ± 3%   -0.73%  (p=0.017 n=28+29)
POST_bindings_p99                  23.5 ± 9%   21.1 ± 4%  -10.09%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_pods_p50                       10.8 ±11%   10.2 ± 5%   -5.47%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_pods_p90                       16.1 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%   -0.64%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                       23.4 ± 9%   20.9 ± 9%  -10.93%  (p=0.000 n=28+27)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50  2.42 ±16%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.054 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90  11.5 ±12%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.141 n=30+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99  19.5 ±21%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.397 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p50                      0.77 ±10%   0.76 ±10%     ~     (p=0.317 n=28+28)
GET_nodes_p90                      1.20 ±16%   1.14 ±24%   -4.66%  (p=0.036 n=28+29)
GET_nodes_p99                      11.4 ±48%    7.5 ±46%  -34.28%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p50     0.74 ±17%   0.73 ±17%     ~     (p=0.222 n=30+28)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90     1.04 ±25%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.231 n=30+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     12.1 ±81%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.063 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p50                       0.78 ±12%   0.77 ±10%     ~     (p=0.178 n=30+28)
GET_pods_p90                       1.06 ±19%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.120 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                       3.92 ±43%   2.45 ±38%  -37.55%  (p=0.000 n=27+25)
LIST_services_p50                  0.20 ±13%   0.20 ±16%     ~     (p=0.854 n=28+29)
LIST_services_p90                  0.28 ±15%   0.27 ±14%     ~     (p=0.219 n=29+28)
LIST_services_p99                  0.49 ±20%   0.47 ±24%     ~     (p=0.140 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p50                 0.19 ±14%   0.19 ±15%     ~     (p=0.709 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p90                 0.26 ±16%   0.26 ±13%     ~     (p=0.274 n=29+28)
LIST_endpoints_p99                 0.46 ±24%   0.44 ±21%     ~     (p=0.111 n=29+29)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p50  0.16 ±15%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.253 n=30+27)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p90  0.22 ±24%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.152 n=30+28)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p99  0.31 ±33%   0.31 ±38%     ~     (p=0.817 n=28+29)
LIST_daemonsets_p50                0.16 ±20%   0.15 ±11%     ~     (p=0.135 n=30+27)
LIST_daemonsets_p90                0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±25%     ~     (p=0.135 n=29+28)
LIST_daemonsets_p99                0.29 ±28%   0.29 ±32%     ~     (p=0.606 n=28+28)
LIST_jobs_p50                      0.16 ±16%   0.15 ±12%     ~     (p=0.375 n=29+28)
LIST_jobs_p90                      0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.090 n=29+26)
LIST_jobs_p99                      0.31 ±28%   0.28 ±35%  -10.29%  (p=0.005 n=29+27)
LIST_deployments_p50               0.15 ±16%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.565 n=29+28)
LIST_deployments_p90               0.22 ±22%   0.21 ±19%     ~     (p=0.107 n=30+28)
LIST_deployments_p99               0.31 ±27%   0.29 ±34%     ~     (p=0.068 n=29+28)
LIST_namespaces_p50                0.21 ±25%   0.21 ±26%     ~     (p=0.768 n=29+27)
LIST_namespaces_p90                0.28 ±29%   0.26 ±25%     ~     (p=0.101 n=30+28)
LIST_namespaces_p99                0.30 ±48%   0.29 ±42%     ~     (p=0.339 n=30+29)
LIST_replicasets_p50               0.15 ±18%   0.15 ±16%     ~     (p=0.612 n=30+28)
LIST_replicasets_p90               0.22 ±19%   0.21 ±18%   -5.13%  (p=0.011 n=28+27)
LIST_replicasets_p99               0.31 ±39%   0.28 ±29%     ~     (p=0.066 n=29+28)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p50         0.16 ±23%   0.15 ±21%     ~     (p=0.124 n=30+29)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p90         0.21 ±23%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.092 n=30+25)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p99         0.21 ±24%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.053 n=30+25)
LIST_resourcequotas_p50            0.16 ±12%   0.16 ±13%     ~     (p=0.175 n=27+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p90            0.20 ±22%   0.20 ±24%     ~     (p=0.388 n=30+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p99            0.22 ±24%   0.22 ±23%     ~     (p=0.575 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p50    0.15 ±21%   0.15 ±29%     ~     (p=0.079 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p90    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p99    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_pods_p50                      68.0 ±16%   56.3 ± 9%  -17.19%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                       119 ±19%     93 ± 8%  -21.88%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p99                       230 ±18%    202 ±14%  -12.13%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
```
2016-04-27 08:32:18 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
c7d1637a0b Merge pull request #24525 from wojtek-t/scheduler_traces
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Add traces to scheduler

This will simplify performance debugging of scheduler.

@davidopp @hongchaodeng @xiang90
2016-04-27 07:16:07 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
32121e344b Merge pull request #24514 from derekwaynecarr/pod_quota_fix
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Quota ignores pod compute resources on updates

Scenario:

1. define a quota Q that tracks memory and cpu
2. create pod P that uses memory=100Mi, cpu=100m
3. update pod P to use memory=50Mi,cpu=10m

Expected Results:
Step 3 should fail with validation error.
Quota Q should not have changed.

Actual Results:
Step 3 fails validation, but quota Q is decremented to have memory usage down 50Mi and cpu usage down 40m.  This is because the quota was getting updated even though the pod was going to fail validation.

Fix:
Quota should only support modifying pod compute resources when pods themselves support modifying their compute resources.

This also fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24352

/cc @smarterclayton - this is what we discussed.

fyi: @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra
2016-04-27 06:27:51 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
a8d9a8dafd Merge pull request #24851 from pmorie/master-test-loc
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Reduce LOC in third party controller test

Extract method refactor to make this test a little more readable

@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery
2016-04-27 05:53:33 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
fc8fa69815 Merge pull request #24582 from xiangpengzhao/master
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Improve error messages in jwt_test.go
2016-04-27 05:53:32 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
8dfb6ebc31 Merge pull request #24360 from freehan/svcflakefix1
Automatic merge from submit-queue

only close new ports upon iptables-restore failure

fixes: #24357
2016-04-27 04:42:13 -07:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
6b1e59e8c8 Merge pull request #24856 from mwielgus/public_drain
Make DrainOptions.getPodsForDeletion public to be reused in ClusterAutoscaler
2016-04-27 13:00:57 +02:00
Marcin Wielgus
41dde20410 Make DrainOptions.getPodsForDeletion public to be reused in ClusterAutoscaler 2016-04-27 11:47:34 +02:00
Harry Zhang
d6f26b68bc Use expiration cache for version check 2016-04-27 05:42:50 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
a907794ce3 Merge pull request #24833 from a-robinson/lbevent
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Fix DeletingLoadBalancer event generation.

release-note:
```release-note
Fix DeletingLoadBalancer event generation.
```

Also patch up a log statement to log the service's namespace and name
rather than potentially just logging `kind:"" apiVersion:""`.

It doesn't work as written because `service` is always nil on this line. If it wasn't, then we wouldn't have taken this branch. `deltaService` is what contains the info that we have about the service.

Example of how the event generation fails as currently written:
```
E0426 22:18:41.726835      10 event.go:257] Could not construct reference to: '&api.Service{TypeMeta:unversioned.TypeMeta{Kind:"", APIVersion:""}, ObjectMeta:api.ObjectMeta{Name:"", GenerateName:"", Namespace:"", SelfLink:"", UID:"", ResourceVersion:"", Generation:0, CreationTimestamp:unversioned.Time{Time:time.Time{sec:0, nsec:0, loc:(*time.Location)(nil)}}, DeletionTimestamp:(*unversioned.Time)(nil), DeletionGracePeriodSeconds:(*int64)(nil), Labels:map[string]string(nil), Annotations:map[string]string(nil)}, Spec:api.ServiceSpec{Type:"", Ports:[]api.ServicePort(nil), Selector:map[string]string(nil), ClusterIP:"", ExternalIPs:[]string(nil), LoadBalancerIP:"", SessionAffinity:""}, Status:api.ServiceStatus{LoadBalancer:api.LoadBalancerStatus{Ingress:[]api.LoadBalancerIngress(nil)}}}' due to: 'selfLink was empty, can't make reference'. Will not report event: 'Normal' 'DeletingLoadBalancer' 'Deleting load balancer'
```
2016-04-27 01:36:20 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
fa3c49b86c Merge pull request #24337 from pditommaso/patch-1
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Allow KUBE_ROOT to be defined externally
2016-04-27 01:02:05 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
3fa84134cd Merge pull request #24124 from vmware/photon-controller
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Initial kube-up support for VMware's Photon Controller

This is for: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24121

Photon Controller is an open-source cloud management platform. More
information is available at:
http://vmware.github.io/photon-controller/

This commit provides initial support for Photon Controller. The
following features are tested and working:
- kube-up and kube-down
- Basic pod and service management
- Networking within the Kubernetes cluster
- UI and DNS addons

It has been tested with a Kubernetes cluster of up to 10
nodes. Further work on scaling is planned for the near future.

Internally we have implemented continuous integration testing and will
run it multiple times per day against the Kubernetes master branch
once this is integrated so we can quickly react to problems.

A few things have not yet been implemented, but are planned:
- Support for kube-push
- Support for test-build-release, test-setup, test-teardown

Assuming this is accepted for inclusion, we will write documentation
for the kubernetes.io site.

We have included a script to help users configure Photon Controller
for use with Kubernetes. While not required, it will help some
users get started more quickly. It will be documented.

We are aware of the kube-deploy efforts and will track them and
support them as appropriate.
2016-04-27 01:02:03 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
b7e4672db9 Merge pull request #23847 from XiaoningDing/federation-apiobject-cluster
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Federation apiobject cluster

add federation api group
add cluster api object and registry
~~generate cluster client~~ moved to #24117
update scripts to generate files for /federation

#19313 #23653 #23554
@nikhiljindal  @quinton-hoole, @deepak-vij, @XiaoningDing, @alfred-huangjian @mfanjie @huangyuqi @colhom
2016-04-27 00:26:22 -07:00
Paul Morie
c386850d23 Reduce LOC in third party controller test 2016-04-27 02:50:46 -04:00
Erick Fejta
08c5af6e45 Use tagged redis image for kubectl test, move json test file out of deprecated examples 2016-04-26 21:43:19 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
af71fa72e7 Merge pull request #23574 from deads2k/add-extra
Automatic merge from submit-queue

add user.Info.GetExtra

I found myself wanting this field (or something like it), when trying to plumb the information about which scopes a particular token has.

Only the token authenticators have that information and I don't want tokens to leak past the authenticator.  I thought about extending the `authenticator.Token` interface to include scopes (`[]string`), but that felt a little specific for what I wanted to do.  I came up with this as an alternative.

It allows the token authenticator to fill in the information and authorizers already get handed the `user.Info`.  It means that implementors can choose to tie the layers together if they wish, using whatever data they think is best.  

@kubernetes/kube-iam
2016-04-26 21:14:53 -07:00
Erick Fejta
e01825bfee Add blocking suites to daily summary
Add title and optional script to html header
2016-04-26 20:15:25 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
c195610847 Merge pull request #24832 from ixdy/jenkins-daily-maintenance-job
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Only remove day+ old containers in Jenkins daily cleanup

Docker has no way to filter by age, so we have to do it with grep instead.

Fixes #24661, I hope.

cc @fejta @spxtr
2016-04-26 18:53:43 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
573ece20a2 Merge pull request #24830 from yujuhong/dummy_env
Automatic merge from submit-queue

e2e: add a dummy environment variable in the service tests

This works around the docker bug:
https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/14203
2016-04-26 18:53:41 -07:00
Jeff Grafton
5487a3f8f6 Fix detect-node-names to not error out if there are no nodes 2016-04-26 17:48:25 -07:00
Joe Finney
7059717c78 Use zone from the test context for static IPs. 2016-04-26 17:39:48 -07:00
Alex Robinson
ed15931935 Fix DeletingLoadBalancer event generation.
Also patch up a log statement to log the service's namespace and name
rather than potentially just logging `kind:"" apiVersion:""`.
2016-04-27 00:27:55 +00:00
David McMahon
f095d9fae5 Rename PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE to PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.
Rename header.  Remove some extra text that wasn't meant for the original PR.
2016-04-26 17:21:25 -07:00
Jeff Grafton
6367cd135f Only remove day+ old containers in Jenkins daily cleanup 2016-04-26 17:08:23 -07:00
Yu-Ju Hong
bdadaefe3b e2e: add a dummy environment variable in the service tests
This works around the docker bug:
https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/14203
2016-04-26 16:25:26 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
3b09c64161 Merge pull request #24818 from deads2k/deflake-quota-int
Automatic merge from submit-queue

deflake quota master init order

fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24816

blocks serving until the Handler is available

@smarterclayton
2016-04-26 15:55:53 -07:00
Jay Vyas
95e315e427 E2E Network performance run which uses iperf.
generic pod-per-node functionality for testing - 2 node test only
- update framework to decompose pod vs svc creation for composition.
- remove hard coded 2 and pointer to --scale
2016-04-26 18:42:19 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
64fbb4a81e Merge pull request #24740 from caesarxuchao/change-update-all-order
Automatic merge from submit-queue

update codegen before update codecgen

Currently if I remove an API field, update-codecgen will complain generated deepcopy functions referring to invalid fields. Running update-codegen before update-codecgen solves the problem.
2016-04-26 15:13:40 -07:00
Isaac Hollander McCreery
215872613b Revert "Always use long format in git tag." 2016-04-26 15:03:15 -07:00
derekwaynecarr
ec5670fd73 Fix function name typo in kubelet 2016-04-26 17:29:44 -04:00
Minhan Xia
0d36dc7000 added test for revertPorts 2016-04-26 14:23:06 -07:00
Minhan Xia
56ad718008 only close new ports upon iptables-restore failure 2016-04-26 14:23:06 -07:00
Q-Lee
be87587158 Merge pull request #24822 from spxtr/revert-shallow-ye
Revert "Shallow clone for kubernetes-build and kubernetes-test-go jobs."
2016-04-26 14:22:16 -07:00
Joe Finney
6b012493c3 Revert "Shallow clone for kubernetes-build and kubernetes-test-go jobs."
This reverts commit 5121ce3dc3.
2016-04-26 14:15:42 -07:00
Minhan Xia
c8470c49ac add mutex for kubenet 2016-04-26 13:58:10 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
bc382a8b0a Merge pull request #24811 from duglin/FixIndent
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Fix indentation of Note

W/o this fix the **Note** shows up a the 2nd option instead of as part of the 1st option.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
2016-04-26 13:45:12 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
373a3ece84 Merge pull request #24475 from k82/k8s-24411
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Clarify `kubectl get service` output.

Pull request for #24411 .
2016-04-26 13:45:09 -07:00
Clayton Coleman
236925be87
Avoid allocations and a reflect.Call in conversion
reflect.Call is fairly expensive, performing 8 allocations and having to
set up a call stack. Using a fairly straightforward to generate switch
statement, we can bypass that early in conversion (as long as the
function takes responsibility for invocation). We may also be able to
avoid an allocation for the conversion scope, but not positive yet.

```
benchmark                    old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkPodConversion-8     14713         12173         -17.26%

benchmark                    old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkPodConversion-8     80             72             -10.00%

benchmark                    old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkPodConversion-8     9133          8712          -4.61%
```
2016-04-26 16:42:12 -04:00