Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
should not fmt.printf in the e2e test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
should not fmt.printf in the e2e test
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67071, 66906, 66722, 67276, 67039). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
#50102 Task 1: Move apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until into client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a split off from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50102 to go in smaller pieces.
Moves `apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until` into `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry` and adds context so it is cancelable.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
**Dev release note**:
```dev-release-note
`apimachinery/pkg/watch.Until` has been moved to `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithoutRetry`.
While switching please consider using the new `client-go/tools/watch.UntilWithSync` or `client-go/tools/watch.Until`.
```
/cc @smarterclayton @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/milestone v1.12
/priority important-soon
/kind bug
(bug after the main PR which is this split from)
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove ARCH specific image consideration from e2e tests
Change-Id: I309fec49b030a4d457890f25d2f69e7c641c03fd
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
All e2e test images are now using multi-arch manifests so we should stop
looking up and using images that are specific to runtime.GOARCH
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67058, 67083, 67220, 67222, 67209). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
All e2e test images are now using multi-arch manifests so we should stop
looking up and using images that are specific to runtime.GOARCH
Change-Id: I5f3fd6e9a42b9fb88891c19e28a2dfcf7a14be82
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67061, 66589, 67121, 67149). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Get load balancer name per provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
GetLoadBalancerName() should be implemented per cloud provider as opposed to one neutral implementation.
This PR will address this by moving `cloudprovider.GetLoadBalancerName()` to the `LoadBalancer interface` and then provide an implementation for each cloud provider, while maintaining previously expected functionality.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes [#43173](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43173)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is a work in progress. Looking for feedback as I work on this, from any interested parties.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Use the same pattern everywhere in the e2e test
harness, use busybox (from dockerhub) instead
of using the one from k8s.gcr.io registry.
Change-Id: I57c3b867408c1f9478a8909c26744ea0368ff003
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 62444, 66358, 66724, 66726). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
GetMasterHost should not return port
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
masterUrl.Host may include port, e.g. 10.114.51.201:8443
GetMasterHost() should not return port
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64695, 65982, 65908). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Collecting etcd metrics
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adding etcd metrics to performance test log.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
ref #64030
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64593, 65117, 65629, 65827, 65686). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add e2e tests for volumeMode of persistent volume
This set of e2e tests is to confirm that persistent volume works well for all volumeModes.
Coverage of the tests are shown in the figure of [Test cases], below.
Once implementation policy is confirmed to be good, we can add plugins and test cases to this.
[Test cases]
```
# plugin volumeMode Test case Expectation
--- ---------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------
1 iSCSI Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
2 iSCSI Block (b) Create Pod and restart kubelet and confirm PV Success
3 iSCSI Block (c) Create Pod and restart kubelet while deleting PV Success
4 iSCSI FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
5 iSCSI FileSystem (b) Create Pod and restart kubelet and confirm PV Success
6 iSCSI FileSystem (c) Create Pod and restart kubelet while deleting PV Success
7 RBD Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
8 RBD Block (b) Create Pod and restart kubelet and confirm PV Success
9 RBD Block (c) Create Pod and restart kubelet while deleting PV Success
10 RBD FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
11 RBD FileSystem (b) Create Pod and restart kubelet and confirm PV Success
12 RBD FileSystem (c) Create Pod and restart kubelet while deleting PV Success
13 CephFS Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Fail
14 CephFS FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
15 CephFS FileSystem (b) Create Pod and restart kubelet and confirm PV Success
16 CephFS FileSystem (c) Create Pod and restart kubelet while deleting PV Success
17 NFS Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Fail
18 NFS FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
19 NFS FileSystem (b) Create Pod and restart kubelet and confirm PV Success
20 NFS FileSystem (c) Create Pod and restart kubelet while deleting PV Success
```
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56803
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig storage
@gnufied @rootfs @jsafrane @jeffvance
This PR is intend to reflect the comments for the below PR.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/56804
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This set of e2e tests is to confirm that persistent volume works well for all volumeModes.
Coverage of the tests are shown in the figure of [Test cases], below.
Once implementation policy is confirmed to be good, we can add plugins and test cases to this.
[Test cases]
# plugin volumeMode Test case Expectation
--- ---------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------
1 iSCSI Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
2 iSCSI FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
3 RBD Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
4 RBD FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
5 CephFS Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Fail
6 CephFS FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
7 NFS Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Fail
8 NFS FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
fixes: #56803
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65339, 65343, 65324, 65335, 65367). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Introduce scheduler CPU/Memory profile-gathering in density test
This should help us get more reliable/realistic data for scheduler (from our real-cluster scalability tests).
/cc @wojtek-t
fyi - @davidopp @bsalamat @misterikkit
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65301, 65291, 65307, 63845, 65313). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix scheduler reset metrics bug in testinfra
/cc @krzysied
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Split scheduler latency metric to fine-grained steps
This splits the summary metric we recently added into finer steps. It should be very useful for performance experiments.
/cc @wojtek-t
fyi - @bsalamat @misterikkit
Strictly speaking this is a breaking change, but since this metric was added only ~week ago I think it should fine (we should port this change to 1.11).
```release-note
Split 'scheduling_latency_seconds' metric into finer steps (predicate, priority, premption)
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64140, 64898, 65022, 65037, 65027). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add e2e regression tests for the kubelet being secure
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR does,
1. The kubelet cAdvisor port (4194) can't be reached, neither via the API server proxy nor directly on the public IP address
2. The kubelet read-only port (10255) can't be reached, neither via the API server proxy nor directly on the public IP address
3. The kubelet can delegate ServiceAccount tokens to the API server
4. The kubelet's main port (10250) has both authentication (should fail with no credentials) and authorization (should fail with insufficient permissions) set-up
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixeskubernetes/kubeadm#838
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc luxas tallclair
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add e2e regression tests for the kubelet being secure
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Better log line in e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Very minor improvement to logs in e2e tests when creating a namespace.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64252, 64307, 64163, 64378, 64179). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add reliable wait for volume server startup.
Remove sleep(20) and check for readiness of volume servers by checking logs.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I prefer checking logs over readiness probe, as it's not easy to probe for Ceph/iSCSI/NFS/Gluster server readiness.
```release-note
NONE
```
@jeffvance @copejon @rootfs @msau42, PTAL
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding scale error retries
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
ScaleWithRetries will retry all retryable errors, not only conflict error.
ref #63030
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 60699, 63780). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
e2e/storage: parameterize container images
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The CSI integration test for hostpath was hard-coded to use the latest
stable release of the sidecar and hostpath container images. This
makes sense for regression testing of changes made in Kubernetes
itself, but the same test is also useful for testing the "canary"
images on quay.io before tagging them as a new release or for testing
locally produced images. Both is now possible via command line
parameters.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Related-to: kubernetes-csi/docs#23
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The commit message has usage instructions.
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig storage
