Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39807, 37505, 39844, 39525, 39109)
Admission control support for versioned configuration files
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Today, the `--admission-control-config-file=` argument takes an opaque file that is shared across all admission controllers to provide configuration. This file is not well-versioned and it's shared across multiple plug-ins. Some plugins take file based configuration (`ImagePolicyWebhook`) and others abuse flags to provide configuration because we lacked a good example (`InitialResources`). This PR defines a versioned configuration format that we can use moving forward to provide configuration input to admission controllers that is well-versioned, and does not require the addition of new flags.
The sample configuration file would look as follows:
```
apiVersion: componentconfig/v1alpha1
kind: AdmissionConfiguration
plugins:
- name: "ImagePolicyWebhook"
path: "image-policy-webhook.json"
```
The general behavior is each plugin that requires additional configuration is enumerated by name. An alternate file location is provided for its specific configuration, or the configuration can be embedded as a raw extension via the configuration section.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
A follow-on PR will be needed to make `ImagePolicyWebhook` to use versioned configuration. This PR maintains backwards compatibility by ignoring configuration it cannot understand and therefore treating the file as opaque. I plan to make use of this PR to complete https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36765 which attempts to allow more configuration parameters to the `ResourceQuota` admission plugin.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39466, 39490, 39527)
bump gengo to latest
bumping gengo to limit surprises while working on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39475
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39351, 39322)
Remove the deprecated --reconcile-cidr flag from kubelet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Removes the `--reconcile-cidr` flag that has been deprecated since v1.5
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
The `--reconcile-cidr` kubelet flag was removed since it had been deprecated since v1.5
```
@thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36263, 36755, 37357, 37222, 37524)
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```release-note
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix default Seccomp profile directory
Looks like some of the refactoring caused us to lose the default
directory. Setting that explicitly here.
Fixes#36350
Provides an opt-in flag, --experimental-fail-swap-on (and corresponding
KubeletConfiguration value, ExperimentalFailSwapOn), which is false by default.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rename experimental-runtime-integration-type to experimental-cri
Also rename the field in the component config to `EnableCRI`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Initial work on running windows containers on Kubernetes
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
This is the first stab at getting the Kubelet running on Windows (fixes#30279), and getting it to deploy network-accessible pods that consist of Windows containers. Thanks @csrwng, @jbhurat for helping out.
The main challenge with Windows containers at this point is that container networking is not supported. In other words, each container in the pod will get it's own IP address. For this reason, we had to make a couple of changes to the kubelet when it comes to setting the pod's IP in the Pod Status. Instead of using the infra-container's IP, we use the IP address of the first container.
Other approaches we investigated involved "disabling" the infra container, either conditionally on `runtime.GOOS` or having a separate windows-docker container runtime that re-implemented some of the methods (would require some refactoring to avoid maintainability nightmare).
Other changes:
- The default docker endpoint was removed. This results in the docker client using the default for the specific underlying OS.
More detailed documentation on how to setup the Windows kubelet can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IjwqpwuRdwcuWXuPSxP-uIz0eoJNfAJ9MWwfY20uH3Q.
cc: @ikester @brendandburns @jstarks
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make using service account credentials from controllers optional
Adds a flag to make the "SA per controller" behavior optional.
