Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move new etcd storage (low level storage) into cacher
In an effort for #29888, we are pushing forward this:
What?
- It changes creating etcd storage.Interface impl into creating config
- In creating cacher storage (StorageWithCacher), it passes config created above and new etcd storage inside.
Why?
- We want to expose the information of (etcd) kv client to cacher. Cacher storage uses this information to talk to remote storage.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Run goimport for the whole repo
While removing GOMAXPROC and running goimports, I noticed quite a lot of other files also needed a goimport format. Didn't commit `*.generated.go`, `*.deepcopy.go` or files in `vendor`
This is more for testing if it builds.
The only strange thing here is the gopkg.in/gcfg.v1 => github.com/scalingdata/gcfg replace.
cc @jfrazelle @thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add subjectaccessreviews resource
Adds a subjectaccessreviews endpoint that uses the API server's authorizer to determine if a subject is allowed to perform an action.
Part of kubernetes/features#37
The swagger spec for pods/{name}/log does not include
"text/plain" as a possible content-type for the the response.
So we implement ProducesMIMETypes to make sure "text/plain"
gets added to the default list ot content-types.
the v1.json was generated by running:
hack/update-generated-swagger-docs.sh;./hack/update-swagger-spec.sh;
Fixes#14071
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make reousrce prefix consistent with other registries
Storage class registry was added recently in #29694.
In other registries, resource prefix was changed to a more generic way using RESTOptions.ResourcePrefix.
This PR is an attempt to make both consistent.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make the resource prefix in etcd configurable for cohabitation
This looks big, its not as bad as it seems.
When you have different resources cohabiting, the resource name used for the etcd directory needs to be configurable. HPA in two different groups worked fine before. Now we're looking at something like RC<->RS. They normally store into two different etcd directories. This code allows them to be configured to store into the same location.
To maintain consistency across all resources, I allowed the `StorageFactory` to indicate which `ResourcePrefix` should be used inside `RESTOptions` which already contains storage information.
@lavalamp affects cohabitation.
@smarterclayton @mfojtik prereq for our rc<->rs and d<->dc story.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
cleanup wrong naming: limitrange -> hpa
The code is in `horizontalpodautoscaler/strategy.go`, but the parameter is "limitrange". This is legacy copy-paste issue...
Automatic merge from submit-queue
include metadata in third party resource list serialization
Third party resource listing does not include important metadata such as resourceVersion and apiVersion. This commit includes the missing metadata and also replaces the string templating with an anonymous struct.
With the introduction of batch/v1 and batch/v2alpha1, any
MultiRESTMapper that has per groupversion mappers (as a naive discovery
client would create) would end up being unable to call RESTMapping() on
batch.Jobs. As we finish up discovery we will need to be able to choose
prioritized RESTMappings based on the service discovery doc.
This change implements RESTMappings(groupversion) which returns all
possible RESTMappings for that kind. That allows a higher level call to
prioritize the returned mappings by server or client preferred version.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
ListOptions: add test for ResourceVersion > 0 in List
ref: #28472
Done:
- Add a test for ResourceVersion > 0 in registry (cache) store List()
- Fix the docs.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
TLS bootstrap API group (alpha)
This PR only covers the new types and related client/storage code- the vast majority of the line count is codegen. The implementation differs slightly from the current proposal document based on discussions in design thread (#20439). The controller logic and kubelet support mentioned in the proposal are forthcoming in separate requests.
I submit that #18762 ("Creating a new API group is really hard") is, if anything, understating it. I've tried to structure the commits to illustrate the process.
@mikedanese @erictune @smarterclayton @deads2k
```release-note-experimental
An alpha implementation of the the TLS bootstrap API described in docs/proposals/kubelet-tls-bootstrap.md.
```
[]()
