Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41794, 42349, 42755, 42901, 42933)
[Federation][e2e] Add framework for upgrade test in federation
Adding framework for federation upgrade tests. please refer to #41791
cc @madhusudancs @nikhiljindal @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42608, 42444)
Return nil when deleting non-exist GCE PD
When gce cloud tries to delete a disk, if the disk could not be found
from the zones, the function should return nil error. This modified behavior is also consistent with AWS
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36704, 42719)
Extend timeouts in taints test to account for slow Pod deletions
Fix#42685
Before merging this we need a consensus on what to do with slow Pod deletions.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
e2e test: Log container output on TestContainerOutput error
When a pod started with TestContainerOutput or TestContainerOutputRegexp
fails from unknown reason, we should log all output of all its containers
so we can analyze what went wrong.
This would help us to see what wrong in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40811 - a container is running there for 3 minutes and dies and we want to see what it did for these 3 minutes.
```release-note
NONE
```
When a pod started with TestContainerOutput or TestContainerOutputRegexp
fails from unknown reason, we should log all output of all its containers
so we can analyze what went wrong.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42734, 42745, 42758, 42814, 42694)
Implement automated downgrade testing.
Node version cannot be higher than the master version, so we must
switch the node version first. Also, we must use the upgrade script
from the appropriate version for GCE.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42734, 42745, 42758, 42814, 42694)
Create DefaultPodDeletionTimeout for e2e tests
In our e2e and e2e_node tests, we had a number of different timeouts for deletion.
Recent changes to the way deletion works (#41644, #41456) have resulted in some timeouts in e2e tests. #42661 was the most recent fix for this.
Most of these tests are not meant to test pod deletion latency, but rather just to clean up pods after a test is finished.
For this reason, we should change all these tests to use a standard, fairly high timeout for deletion.
cc @vishh @Random-Liu
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Don't wait for the final deletion of pod
The final deletion of the pod depends on kubelet and other components operating correctly. The purpose of this e2e test is verifying the clientset can handle deleteOptions correctly, so waiting for the deletionTimestamp and deletionGraceperiod get set is good enough.
In the long run, we should move this set of e2e tests to integration tests.
Fix#42724#42646
cc @marun
Node version cannot be higher than the master version, so we must
switch the node version first. Also, we must use the upgrade script
from the appropriate version for GCE.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add default storageclass tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds test cases for using and disabling the default storageclass.
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42211, 38691, 42737, 42757, 42754)
Add more e2e tests for DaemonSet templateGeneration and pod adoption
Depends on #42173
@erictune @kargakis @lukaszo @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42652, 42681, 42708, 42730)
e2e: fix restarting the apiserver
The string used to match the image name of the apiserver (e.g., `gcr.io/google_containers/kube-apiserver:3be...`),
but this no longer works. Change the test to locate the kube-apiserver container by name.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Create "framework" per upgrade test
There were already a few tests just using the default framework
namespace instead of creating a new one. Also there are several
testing libraries that use the default framework's default namespace
as well. It's just easier this way.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41890, 42593, 42633, 42626, 42609)
Pods pending due to insufficient OIR should get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available (e2e disabled).
#41870 was reverted because it introduced an e2e test flake. This is the same code with the e2e for OIR disabled again.
We can attempt to enable the e2e test cases one-by-one in follow-up PRs, but it would be preferable to get the main fix merged in time for 1.6 since OIR is broken on master (see #41861).
cc @timothysc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41890, 42593, 42633, 42626, 42609)
Remove everything that is not new from batch/v2alpha1
Fixes#37166.
@lavalamp you've asked for it
@erictune this is a prereq for moving CronJobs to beta. I initially planned to put all in one PR, but after I did that I figured out it'll be easier to review separately. ptal
@kubernetes/api-approvers @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42080, 41653, 42598, 42555)
Fix resource cleanup in ingress_utils.go within e2e/framework
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The GLBC is failing to delete resources during the etcd rollback tests and the e2e cleanup is leaking them. After a short while, tests are failing to create new resources.
This PR addresses the e2e/framework's ability to delete GLBC-created resources and adds more logging.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Helps #38569 but does not completely close this flake
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Resources were not being deleted because resource names were being truncated and then their ability to be deleted was determined by the entire cluster id existing in the name. Truncated names also have an extra '0' append to the end of their name (unknown origin). This PR tries to match on a common prefix.
Minor changes were made to improve log readability.
**Testing this PR**:
This was tested by running a master upgrade test and by adding a second forwarding-rule mid-run. This forwarding rule referenced the same url-map used by the first forwarding-rule created by the GLBC. Therefore, the GLBC will be able to delete the forwarding-rule but not anymore L7 resources. This second forwarding rule's name was nearly identical to the first forwarding rule so that the cleanup code will find it.
As you can see from the test run below, the cleanup code deleted all the resources that the GLBC could not.
```log
...
Mar 5 18:35:53.112: INFO: Monitoring glbc's cleanup of gce resources:
k8s-fws-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrsde-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420 (forwarding rule)
k8s-tps-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420 (target-https-proxy)
k8s-um-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e24260 (url-map)
k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796 (backend-service)
k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796 (backend-service)
k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796 (http-health-check)
k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796 (http-health-check)
k8s-ig--5f38ac0e2426f796 (instance-group)
k8s-ssl-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420 (ssl-certificate)
STEP: Performing final delete of any remaining resources
Mar 5 18:35:54.055: INFO: Deleting forwarding-rules: k8s-fws-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrsde-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420
Mar 5 18:36:06.945: INFO: Deleting target-https-proxies: k8s-tps-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420
Mar 5 18:36:14.301: INFO: Deleting url-map: k8s-um-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e24260
Mar 5 18:36:18.309: INFO: Deleting backed-service: k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:22.112: INFO: Deleting backed-service: k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:26.192: INFO: Deleting http-health-check: k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:29.846: INFO: Deleting http-health-check: k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:33.722: INFO: Deleting instance-group: k8s-ig--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:37.762: INFO: Deleting ssl-certificate: k8s-ssl-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420
STEP: No resources leaked.
Mar 5 18:36:46.441: INFO: Deleting addresses: e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip
Mar 5 18:36:53.902: INFO: L7 controller failed to delete all cloud resources on time. timed out waiting for the condition
...
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42080, 41653, 42598, 42555)
Revert "Pods pending due to insufficient OIR should get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available."
Reverts kubernetes/kubernetes#41870 for stopping bleeding edge: #42597
cc/ @ConnorDoyle @kubernetes/release-team
Connor if there is a pending pr to fix the issue, please point it out to me. We can close this one, otherwise, I would like to revert the pr first. You can resubmit the fix. Thanks!
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42080, 41653, 42598, 42555)
StatefulSet: Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings StatefulSet into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#36859
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
StatefulSet now respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting over Pods. At the time of upgrade, **you must not have StatefulSets with selectors that overlap** with any other controllers (such as ReplicaSets), or else [ownership of Pods may change](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md#upgrading).
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
The list functions in deployment/util are used outside the Deployment
controller itself. Therefore, they don't do actual adoption/orphaning.
However, they still need to avoid listing things that don't belong.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41826, 42405)
Fixed too long name in HPA e2e upgrade test.
Fixed too long name in HPA e2e upgrade test.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41826, 42405)
Add stubDomains and upstreamNameservers configuration to kube-dns
```release-note
Updates the dnsmasq cache/mux layer to be managed by dnsmasq-nanny.
dnsmasq-nanny manages dnsmasq based on values from the
kube-system:kube-dns configmap:
"stubDomains": {
"acme.local": ["1.2.3.4"]
},
is a map of domain to list of nameservers for the domain. This is used
to inject private DNS domains into the kube-dns namespace. In the above
example, any DNS requests for *.acme.local will be served by the
nameserver 1.2.3.4.
"upstreamNameservers": ["8.8.8.8", "8.8.4.4"]
is a list of upstreamNameservers to use, overriding the configuration
specified in /etc/resolv.conf.
```
There were already a few tests just using the default framework
namespace instead of creating a new one. Also there are several
testing libraries that use the default framework's default namespace
as well. It's just easier this way.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 31783, 41988, 42535, 42572, 41870)
Pods pending due to insufficient OIR should get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available.
This appears to be a regression since v1.5.0 in scheduler behavior for opaque integer resources, reported in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41861.
- [X] Add failing e2e test to trigger the regression
- [x] Restore previous behavior (pods pending due to insufficient OIR get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available.)
