The name "PodScheduling" was unusual because in contrast to most other names,
it was impossible to put an article in front of it. Now PodSchedulingContext is
used instead.
* apiserver: add latency tracker for priority & fairness queue wait time
Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
* apiserver: exclude priority & fairness wait times to SLO/SLI latency metrics
Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
* apiserver: update TestLatencyTrackersFrom to check latency from PriorityAndFairnessTracker
Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
* flowcontrol: add helper function observeQueueWaitTime to consolidate metric and latency tracker calls
Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
* flowcontrol: replace time.Now() / time.Since() with clock.Now() / clock.Since() for better testability
Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
* flowcontrol: add unit test TestQueueWaitTimeLatencyTracker to validate queue wait times recorded by latency tracker
Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Sy Kim <andrewsy@google.com>
Annotation
As part of this change, kube-proxy accepts any value for either
annotation that is not "disabled".
Change-Id: Idfc26eb4cc97ff062649dc52ed29823a64fc59a4
Note that this fixes a bug in the existing `toBytes` implementation
which does not correctly set the capacity on the returned slice.
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@microsoft.com>
SyncKnownPods began triggering UpdatePod() for pods that have been
orphaned by desired config to ensure pods run to termination. This
test reads a mutex protected value while pod workers are running
in the background and as a consequence triggers a data race.
Wait for the workers to stabilize before reading the value. Other
tests validate that the correct sync events are triggered (see
kubelet_pods_test.go#TestKubelet_HandlePodCleanups for full
verification of this behavior).
It is slightly concerning that I was unable to recreate the race
locally even under stress testing, but I cannot identify why.
To that end, we need to add one kubelet getter listPodsFromDisk(). Other
than that, it is a pretty trivial move.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>
Latest changes to KEP-127 removed that phase, so let's stop reserving
those IDs for that.
While we are there, we replace 0 for 0*65536 as before we had a bug that
we were not multiplying the index, to avoid bugs in the future.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>
