e2e-node tests may use custom system specs for validating nodes to
conform the specs. The functionality is switched on when the tests
are run with this command:
make SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME=gke test-e2e-node
Currently the command fails with the error:
F1228 16:12:41.568836 34514 e2e_node_suite_test.go:106] Failed to load system spec: open /home/rojkov/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/util/system/specs/gke.yaml: no such file or directory
Move the spec file under `test/e2e_node/system/specs` and introduce a single
public constant referring the file to use instead of multiple private constants.
- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
This previously caused a panic when moving lastKnownGood between two
non-nil values, because we were comparing the interface wrapper instead
of comparing the NodeConfigSources. The case of moving from one non-nil
lastKnownGood config to another doesn't appear to be tested by the e2e
node tests. I added a unit test and an e2e node test to help catch bugs
with this case in the future.
Not all users of the E2E framework want to run cloud-provider specific
tests. By splitting out the code it becomes possible to decide in
a E2E test suite which providers are supported.
This is achieved in two ways:
- the framework calls certain functions through a provider
interface instead of calling specific cloud provider functions
directly
- tests that are cloud-provider specific directly import the
new provider packages
The ingress test utilities are only needed by a few tests. Splitting
them out into a separate package makes the framework simpler for test
suites not using those tests.
Fixes: #66649
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65250, 68241). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Initial node performance testing framework.
This PR adds a framework for node performance testing.
Partially fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/65249.
Use the following command to run this test:
```sh
make test-e2e-node FOCUS="Node Performance Testing" SKIP="" PARALLELISM=1
```
It has been tested in the following environment:
- n1-standard-16
- Ubuntu 16.04
- docker 17.03.2
Note to reviewers:
This PR won't pass node e2e since the docker images in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65251 are required for this to function. The node e2e will fail when trying to pull the required images for testing.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67736, 68123, 68138). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Port security context NodeConformance e2e_node tests to e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Port all [NodeConformance] SecurityContext e2e_node tests to e2e/common.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67032
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- This PR is a continuing effort to close#67032.
- Removed ContainerRuntime constraint [as discussed](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/67032#discussion_r214201870).
- Porting all [NodeConformance] tests to e2e/common which do not have node dependencies.
- Does it make sense to port [privileged test](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e_node/security_context_test.go#L558) to e2e/common and remove [NodeFeature:HostAccess] label from test name?
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix error link in comment
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix error link in comment
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig node
manager change in commit 7b1ae66.
Also changes the test to make sure node is indeed ready after Kubelet
restart. The previous readiness check may use old API state but
didn't run into the issue due to the delay of waiting for pod restart.
