Instead of modifying the PodSchedulingContext and then creating or updating it,
now the required changes (selected node, potential nodes) are tracked and the
actual input for an API call is created if (and only if) needed at the end.
This makes the code easier to read and change. In particular, replacing the
Update call with Patch or Apply is easy.
After 12 months as reviewer, constantly reviewing and contributing
to client-go, I think is fair to move to the next ladder.
Change-Id: I49e579dcefcd39c6f0b29400c90467df00719cca
Rename the apiserver_request_body_sizes metric to
apiserver_request_body_size_bytes to conform with Prometheus best
practices.
This can be done safely without deprecation because that metric wasn't
registered before.
Signed-off-by: Damien Grisonnet <dgrisonn@redhat.com>
Add and use more facilities to the *internal* podresources client.
Checking e2e test runs, we have quite some
```
rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = connection error: desc = "transport: Error while dialing: dial unix /var/lib/kubelet/pod-resources/kubelet.sock: connect: connection refused": rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = connection error: desc = "transport: Error while dialing: dial unix /var/lib/kubelet/pod-resources/kubelet.sock: connect: connection refused"
```
This is likely caused by kubelet restarts, which we do plenty in e2e tests,
combined with the fact gRPC does lazy connection AND we don't really
check the errors in client code - we just bubble them up.
While it's arguably bad we don't check properly error codes, it's also
true that in the main case, e2e tests, the functions should just never
fail besides few well known cases, we're connecting over a
super-reliable unix domain socket after all.
So, we centralize the fix adding a function (alongside with minor
cleanups) which wants to trigger and ensure the connection happens,
localizing the changes just here. The main advantage is this approach
is opt-in, composable, and doesn't leak gRPC details into the client
code.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
This deflakes the "Containers Lifecycle should not launch second
container before PostStart of the first container completed" test by
assigning enough time to finish the postStart hook.
This particualar warning didn't make it into
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/117288. Discussion on Slack
concluded that "it's hard to have a universal policy for all functions marked
deprecated" and thus this can only be a hint which must be considered on a
case-by-case basis.
For example, APIs like sets.String are very unlikely to ever go away, therefore
it is entirely up to developers whether they switch to sets.Set even though
sets.String is marked as deprecated.
Ideally, the deprecation message should explain this. It doesn't for sets ("use
generic Set instead"), so a better message in that case would have been
"consider using generic Set instead".
