github/langchain
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain.git synced 2025-09-10 15:33:11 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

codespell: workflow, config + some (quite a few) typos fixed (#6785)

Browse Source 
Probably the most  boring PR to review ;)

Individual commits might be easier to digest

---------

Co-authored-by: Bagatur <baskaryan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bagatur <22008038+baskaryan@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Yaroslav Halchenko
2023-07-12 16:20:08 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 931e68692e
commit 0d92a7f357
100 changed files with 213 additions and 127 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/extras/modules/data_connection/document_loaders/integrations/example_data/testmw_pages_current.xml
View File

@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ This category contains articles that are incomplete and are tagged with the {{T|
<username>FANDOM</username>
<id>32769624</id>
</contributor>
<comment>Created page with "{{LicenseBox|text=''This work is licensed under the [https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT MIT License].''}}{{#ifeq: {{NAMESPACENUMBER}} | 0 | &lt;includeonly&gt;Category:MIT licens..."</comment>
<comment>Created page with "{{LicenseBox|text=''This work is licensed under the [https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT MIT License].''}}{{#ifeq: {{NAMESPACENUMBER}} | 0 | &lt;includeonly&gt;Category:MIT license..."</comment>
<origin>104</origin>
<model>wikitext</model>
<format>text/x-wiki</format>

2
docs/extras/modules/paul_graham_essay.txt
View File

@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ There were three main parts to the software: the editor, which people used to bu
There were a lot of startups making ecommerce software in the second half of the 90s. We were determined to be the Microsoft Word, not the Interleaf. Which meant being easy to use and inexpensive. It was lucky for us that we were poor, because that caused us to make Viaweb even more inexpensive than we realized. We charged $100 a month for a small store and $300 a month for a big one. This low price was a big attraction, and a constant thorn in the sides of competitors, but it wasn't because of some clever insight that we set the price low. We had no idea what businesses paid for things. $300 a month seemed like a lot of money to us.
We did a lot of things right by accident like that. For example, we did what's now called "doing things that don't scale," although at the time we would have described it as "being so lame that we're driven to the most desperate measures to get users." The most common of which was building stores for them. This seemed particularly humiliating, since the whole raison d'etre of our software was that people could use it to make their own stores. But anything to get users.
We did a lot of things right by accident like that. For example, we did what's now called "doing things that don't scale," although at the time we would have described it as "being so lame that we're driven to the most desperate measures to get users." The most common of which was building stores for them. This seemed particularly humiliating, since the whole reason d'etre of our software was that people could use it to make their own stores. But anything to get users.
We learned a lot more about retail than we wanted to know. For example, that if you could only have a small image of a man's shirt (and all images were small then by present standards), it was better to have a closeup of the collar than a picture of the whole shirt. The reason I remember learning this was that it meant I had to rescan about 30 images of men's shirts. My first set of scans were so beautiful too.