Fix Typos in Vectorstore Integration Documentation Notebooks (#31612)

Description:  
This pull request corrects minor typographical errors in the
documentation notebooks for vectorstore integrations. Specifically, it
fixes the spelling of "datastore" in `llm_rails.ipynb` and
"pre-existent" in `redis.ipynb`. These changes improve the clarity and
professionalism of the documentation. No functional code changes are
included.
This commit is contained in:
fuder.eth 2025-06-14 23:40:18 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent f345ae5a1d
commit 50f998a138
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
"source": [
"## Adding text\n",
"\n",
"For adding text to your datastore first you have to go to [Datastores](https://console.llmrails.com/datastores) page and create one. Click Create Datastore button and choose a name and embedding model for your datastore. Then get your datastore id from newly created datatore settings.\n",
"For adding text to your datastore first you have to go to [Datastores](https://console.llmrails.com/datastores) page and create one. Click Create Datastore button and choose a name and embedding model for your datastore. Then get your datastore id from newly created datastore settings.\n",
" "
]
},

View File

@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
{
"data": {
"text/plain": [
"('From: bil@okcforum.osrhe.edu (Bill Conner)\\nSubject: Re: Not the Omni!\\nNntp-Posting-Host: okcforum.osrhe.edu\\nOrganization: Okcforum Unix Users Group\\nX-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]\\nLines: 18\\n\\nCharley Wingate (mangoe@cs.umd.edu) wrote:\\n: \\n: >> Please enlighten me. How is omnipotence contradictory?\\n: \\n: >By definition, all that can occur in the universe is governed by the rules\\n: >of nature. Thus god cannot break them. Anything that god does must be allowed\\n: >in the rules somewhere. Therefore, omnipotence CANNOT exist! It contradicts\\n: >the rules of nature.\\n: \\n: Obviously, an omnipotent god can change the rules.\\n\\nWhen you say, \"By definition\", what exactly is being defined;\\ncertainly not omnipotence. You seem to be saying that the \"rules of\\nnature\" are pre-existant somehow, that they not only define nature but\\nactually cause it. If that\\'s what you mean I\\'d like to hear your\\nfurther thoughts on the question.\\n\\nBill\\n',\n",
"('From: bil@okcforum.osrhe.edu (Bill Conner)\\nSubject: Re: Not the Omni!\\nNntp-Posting-Host: okcforum.osrhe.edu\\nOrganization: Okcforum Unix Users Group\\nX-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]\\nLines: 18\\n\\nCharley Wingate (mangoe@cs.umd.edu) wrote:\\n: \\n: >> Please enlighten me. How is omnipotence contradictory?\\n: \\n: >By definition, all that can occur in the universe is governed by the rules\\n: >of nature. Thus god cannot break them. Anything that god does must be allowed\\n: >in the rules somewhere. Therefore, omnipotence CANNOT exist! It contradicts\\n: >the rules of nature.\\n: \\n: Obviously, an omnipotent god can change the rules.\\n\\nWhen you say, \"By definition\", what exactly is being defined;\\ncertainly not omnipotence. You seem to be saying that the \"rules of\\nnature\" are pre-existent somehow, that they not only define nature but\\nactually cause it. If that\\'s what you mean I\\'d like to hear your\\nfurther thoughts on the question.\\n\\nBill\\n',\n",
" {'category': 'alt.atheism'})"
]
},